[Peace-discuss] A vote for Kerry is a vote for Bush!

Mon May 3 14:21:40 CDT 2004

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Urban" <kurban at parkland.edu>
To: <pstinard at hotmail.com>; <peace-discuss at lists.cu.groogroo.com>
Cc: <prairiegreens at lists.groogroo.com>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] A vote for Kerry is a vote for Bush!

> Bravo to you Phil!
>
> As I've pointed out before, a democratic president, Clinton has killed a
lot more Iraqis than Bush has.  I don't see any reason that Kerry will
change that, in fact, in order to keep up this facade of misguided
"manliness" to "stay the course", Kerry will be just as bad as Bush in the
near term.

   Riiiiiiight.

To: LdSentinal
OUTSTANDING!!!!!! who knew that 600,000 Freepers would each send him a
dollar...

2 posted on 04/21/2004 1:21:01 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have
children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: ken5050
Go, Ralph GO!

3 posted on 04/21/2004 1:29:24 PM PDT by IGOTMINE ("By God, I pity those
poor bastards we're going up against. By God I do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: LdSentinal
Do you suppose that "Darth" Nadar is causing some concern in the Kerry Kamp?

Gosh, I hope not.

NOT!

4 posted on 04/21/2004 1:33:35 PM PDT by Dr. Faust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: LdSentinal
Do you suppose that "Darth" Nader is causing some concern in the Kerry Kamp?

Gosh, I hope not.

NOT!

5 posted on 04/21/2004 1:34:45 PM PDT by Dr. Faust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: All
Folks, if you can find a way to send him money, send him money. Money keeps
him in the race. And worse, and even more difficult for us, the right answer
to any polling questions you get on the telephone is NADER. If he seems a
legitimate alternative to "Bush Lite", then he will suck away votes from the
left on November 2.

6 posted on 04/21/2004 1:40:57 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: LdSentinal
We should all find out what we need to do in our state to help Ralphie get
on the ballot. Let's make it happen!

7 posted on 04/21/2004 1:41:35 PM PDT by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: LdSentinal
One thing about Kerry and Bush is that both of them receive all their
donations from people that support them. Neither is getting matching funds
( I believe). Nader, on the other hand, wants his campaign supported largely
by those who do not support HIM. If you cannot survive without matching
funds then maybe you do not really have very strong support.

8 posted on 04/21/2004 1:42:39 PM PDT by KJacob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: KJacob
Neither is getting matching funds ( I believe).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Neither President Bush or Sen. Kerry have taken Fed matching funds for the
Primary season, but both have indicated they will take them for the Campaign
which becomes effective for them when they are nominated/accepted at their
respective conventions.... The estimated funds will be somewhere around $75
Million each. Thus Kerry will begin spending his allotment about 33 days
prior to Bush...

9 posted on 04/21/2004 1:48:41 PM PDT by deport (To a dog all roads lead
home.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: comebacknewt
Ballot Access for Nader

10 posted on 04/21/2004 1:50:43 PM PDT by deport (To a dog all roads lead
home.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: ken5050
"OUTSTANDING!!!!!! who knew that 600,000 Freepers would each send him a
dollar..."

Now, THAT is cute.. LOL.

You betcha... HE DESERVES HIS SHARE! Keep that money going his way.

11 posted on 04/21/2004 1:53:09 PM PDT by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: deport
Thanks for clarifying.

12 posted on 04/21/2004 1:53:43 PM PDT by KJacob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: Owen
Folks, if you can find a way to send him money, send him money. Money keeps
him in the race.
I know you're right, but I even begrudge him the oxygen he takes out of the
air. I guess the people stupid enough to check "Yes" on that Presidential
Campaign Fund box on their taxes are expecting to see their money spent
somewhere. I just hope Ralphie spends it to let me watch baseball games for
free on TV.

13 posted on 04/21/2004 2:11:57 PM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and
the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

[ Browse | Search | Topics ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2003 Robinson-DeFehr
Consulting, LLC.

To: Oldeconomybuyer
nadir's already got matching funds now, too ... i guess i don't mind letting
ralph have a few bucks if it means complete political humiliation for
kerryandtheleft

2 posted on 04/23/2004 5:29:22 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch (I actually did
vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Though i would love Nader to capture 10% I really dont think it will happen
i think that the Nader supporters will go with Kerry and Nader may only get
about half of what he did in 2000
of course i do hope that i am wrong and Kerry is destroyed on both fronts

3 posted on 04/23/2004 5:30:07 AM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I think that more people will vote for Nader this time because Kerry is so
arrogant and unlikeable.

4 posted on 04/23/2004 5:30:57 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Not so fast. In 2000, Nader received 2.7 percent of the vote. The latest
Gallup Poll, taken April 5-8, gives him 4 percent. A Newsweek poll of
18-to-29 year-olds found 12 percent backing Nader, "at the expense of John
Kerry." And Democrats have to be worried about a survey in New Hampshire
last month that found Nader with 8 percent.
GO NADER GO! November has the makings of the "perfect storm" for the liberal
left...

5 posted on 04/23/2004 5:31:29 AM PDT by 2banana (They want to die for Islam
and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: Piquaboy
I think that more people will vote for Nader this time because Kerry is so
arrogant and unlikeable.
And I used to think Nader was arrogant and unlikeable, but I guess you're
right -- Kerry wins that contest hands down!

6 posted on 04/23/2004 5:43:54 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Well, if Perot hadn't run in 1992, Bush would probably have won a second
term. Remember Clinton only got 42% of the vote. Then who would have run in
1996? It would have been a clean slate. Everything would have been
different.

7 posted on 04/23/2004 5:46:05 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Looks like Heinz-Kerry might get the squeeze. Get it, like a bottle of
Kechup.

To: All
I'm not so sure Nader can swing the elections. Will these Naders supporters
actually vote for Kerry should Nader drop out? My guess is they won't even
show up on poll day.

10 posted on 04/23/2004 6:06:52 AM PDT by excalibur1701
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: excalibur1701
I'm not so sure it came down to 500 votes in Florida, either. If they backed
out all the "votes" from dead people and their dogs in Chicago and St.
Louis, then added in the absentee votes from the overseas military, W would
have won without breaking a sweat.

11 posted on 04/23/2004 7:04:44 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

To: Eric in the Ozarks; 88keys; Akron Al; babyface00; Badray; Bikers4Bush;
boxerblues; Captiva; ...
All the more reason to circulate Nader petitions in your neighborhood, and
get him on the ballot in your state?

In God We Trust...Semper Fi!

12 posted on 04/23/2004 9:22:13 AM PDT by conspiratoristo (Never take a gun
to a gunfight that is less than .40 cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 13237 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20040503/be283a11/attachment-0001.jpe