[Peace-discuss] Seymour Hersh's latest New Yorker article skewers
Rumsfeld, Part 1
Phil Stinard
pstinard at hotmail.com
Sun May 16 08:21:52 CDT 2004
I'm sending this out in two parts, because it was so big that it bounced.
--Phil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040524fa_fact
THE GRAY ZONE
by SEYMOUR M. HERSH
How a secret Pentagon program came to Abu Ghraib.
Issue of 2004-05-24
Posted 2004-05-15
The roots of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal lie not in the criminal
inclinations of a few Army reservists but in a decision, approved last year
by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, to expand a highly secret
operation, which had been focussed on the hunt for Al Qaeda, to the
interrogation of prisoners in Iraq. Rumsfelds decision embittered the
American intelligence community, damaged the effectiveness of élite combat
units, and hurt Americas prospects in the war on terror.
According to interviews with several past and present American intelligence
officials, the Pentagons operation, known inside the intelligence community
by several code words, including Copper Green, encouraged physical coercion
and sexual humiliation of Iraqi prisoners in an effort to generate more
intelligence about the growing insurgency in Iraq. A senior C.I.A. official,
in confirming the details of this account last week, said that the operation
stemmed from Rumsfelds long-standing desire to wrest control of Americas
clandestine and paramilitary operations from the C.I.A.
Rumsfeld, during appearances last week before Congress to testify about Abu
Ghraib, was precluded by law from explicitly mentioning highly secret
matters in an unclassified session. But he conveyed the message that he was
telling the public all that he knew about the story. He said, Any
suggestion that there is not a full, deep awareness of what has happened,
and the damage it has done, I think, would be a misunderstanding. The
senior C.I.A. official, asked about Rumsfelds testimony and that of Stephen
Cambone, his Under-Secretary for Intelligence, said, Some people think you
can bullshit anyone.
The Abu Ghraib story began, in a sense, just weeks after the September 11,
2001, attacks, with the American bombing of Afghanistan. Almost from the
start, the Administrations search for Al Qaeda members in the war zone, and
its worldwide search for terrorists, came up against major
command-and-control problems. For example, combat forces that had Al Qaeda
targets in sight had to obtain legal clearance before firing on them. On
October 7th, the night the bombing began, an unmanned Predator aircraft
tracked an automobile convoy that, American intelligence believed, contained
Mullah Muhammad Omar, the Taliban leader. A lawyer on duty at the United
States Central Command headquarters, in Tampa, Florida, refused to authorize
a strike. By the time an attack was approved, the target was out of reach.
Rumsfeld was apoplectic over what he saw as a self-defeating hesitation to
attack that was due to political correctness. One officer described him to
me that fall as kicking a lot of glass and breaking doors. In November,
the Washington Post reported that, as many as ten times since early October,
Air Force pilots believed theyd had senior Al Qaeda and Taliban members in
their sights but had been unable to act in time because of legalistic
hurdles. There were similar problems throughout the world, as American
Special Forces units seeking to move quickly against suspected terrorist
cells were compelled to get prior approval from local American ambassadors
and brief their superiors in the chain of command.
Rumsfeld reacted in his usual direct fashion: he authorized the
establishment of a highly secret program that was given blanket advance
approval to kill or capture and, if possible, interrogate high value
targets in the Bush Administrations war on terror. A special-access
program, or sapsubject to the Defense Departments most stringent level of
securitywas set up, with an office in a secure area of the Pentagon. The
program would recruit operatives and acquire the necessary equipment,
including aircraft, and would keep its activities under wraps. Americas
most successful intelligence operations during the Cold War had been saps,
including the Navys submarine penetration of underwater cables used by the
Soviet high command and construction of the Air Forces stealth bomber. All
the so-called black programs had one element in common: the Secretary of
Defense, or his deputy, had to conclude that the normal military
classification restraints did not provide enough security.
Rumsfelds goal was to get a capability in place to take on a high-value
targeta standup group to hit quickly, a former high-level intelligence
official told me. He got all the agencies togetherthe C.I.A. and the
N.S.A.to get pre-approval in place. Just say the code word and go. The
operation had across-the-board approval from Rumsfeld and from Condoleezza
Rice, the national-security adviser. President Bush was informed of the
existence of the program, the former intelligence official said.
The people assigned to the program worked by the book, the former
intelligence official told me. They created code words, and recruited, after
careful screening, highly trained commandos and operatives from Americas
élite forcesNavy seals, the Armys Delta Force, and the C.I.A.s
paramilitary experts. They also asked some basic questions: Do the people
working the problem have to use aliases? Yes. Do we need dead drops for the
mail? Yes. No traceability and no budget. And some special-access programs
are never fully briefed to Congress.
In theory, the operation enabled the Bush Administration to respond
immediately to time-sensitive intelligence: commandos crossed borders
without visas and could interrogate terrorism suspects deemed too important
for transfer to the militarys facilities at Guantánamo, Cuba. They carried
out instant interrogationsusing force if necessaryat secret C.I.A.
detention centers scattered around the world. The intelligence would be
relayed to the sap command center in the Pentagon in real time, and sifted
for those pieces of information critical to the white, or overt, world.
Fewer than two hundred operatives and officials, including Rumsfeld and
General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were
completely read into the program, the former intelligence official said.
The goal was to keep the operation protected. Were not going to read more
people than necessary into our heart of darkness, he said. The rules are
Grab whom you must. Do what you want.
One Pentagon official who was deeply involved in the program was Stephen
Cambone, who was named Under-Secretary of Defense for Intelligence in March,
2003. The office was new; it was created as part of Rumsfelds
reorganization of the Pentagon. Cambone was unpopular among military and
civilian intelligence bureaucrats in the Pentagon, essentially because he
had little experience in running intelligence programs, though in 1998 he
had served as staff director for a committee, headed by Rumsfeld, that
warned of an emerging ballistic-missile threat to the United States. He was
known instead for his closeness to Rumsfeld. Remember Henry IIWho will
rid me of this meddlesome priest? the senior C.I.A. official said to me,
with a laugh, last week. Whatever Rumsfeld whimsically says, Cambone will
do ten times that much.
Cambone was a strong advocate for war against Iraq. He shared Rumsfelds
disdain for the analysis and assessments proffered by the C.I.A., viewing
them as too cautious, and chafed, as did Rumsfeld, at the C.I.A.s
inability, before the Iraq war, to state conclusively that Saddam Hussein
harbored weapons of mass destruction. Cambones military assistant, Army
Lieutenant General William G. (Jerry) Boykin, was also controversial. Last
fall, he generated unwanted headlines after it was reported that, in a
speech at an Oregon church, he equated the Muslim world with Satan.
Early in his tenure, Cambone provoked a bureaucratic battle within the
Pentagon by insisting that he be given control of all special-access
programs that were relevant to the war on terror. Those programs, which had
been viewed by many in the Pentagon as sacrosanct, were monitored by Kenneth
deGraffenreid, who had experience in counter-intelligence programs. Cambone
got control, and deGraffenreid subsequently left the Pentagon. Asked for
comment on this story, a Pentagon spokesman said, I will not discuss any
covert programs; however, Dr. Cambone did not assume his position as the
Under-Secretary of Defense for Intelligence until March 7, 2003, and had no
involvement in the decision-making process regarding interrogation
procedures in Iraq or anywhere else.
In mid-2003, the special-access program was regarded in the Pentagon as one
of the success stories of the war on terror. It was an active program, the
former intelligence official told me. Its been the most important
capability we have for dealing with an imminent threat. If we discover where
Osama bin Laden is, we can get him. And we can remove an existing threat
with a real capability to hit the United Statesand do so without
visibility. Some of its methods were troubling and could not bear close
scrutiny, however.
By then, the war in Iraq had begun. The sap was involved in some assignments
in Iraq, the former official said. C.I.A. and other American Special Forces
operatives secretly teamed up to hunt for Saddam Hussein andwithout
successfor Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. But they werent able to stop
the evolving insurgency.
In the first months after the fall of Baghdad, Rumsfeld and his aides still
had a limited view of the insurgency, seeing it as little more than the work
of Baathist dead-enders, criminal gangs, and foreign terrorists who were
Al Qaeda followers. The Administration measured its success in the war by
how many of those on its list of the fifty-five most wanted members of the
old regimereproduced on playing cardshad been captured. Then, in August,
2003, terror bombings in Baghdad hit the Jordanian Embassy, killing nineteen
people, and the United Nations headquarters, killing twenty-three people,
including Sergio Vieira de Mello, the head of the U.N. mission. On August
25th, less than a week after the U.N. bombing, Rumsfeld acknowledged, in a
talk before the Veterans of Foreign Wars, that the dead-enders are still
with us. He went on, There are some today who are surprised that there are
still pockets of resistance in Iraq, and they suggest that this represents
some sort of failure on the part of the Coalition. But this is not the
case. Rumsfeld compared the insurgents with those true believers who
fought on during and after the defeat of the Nazi regime in Germany. A few
weeks laterand five months after the fall of Baghdadthe Defense Secretary
declared,It is, in my view, better to be dealing with terrorists in Iraq
than in the United States.
Inside the Pentagon, there was a growing realization that the war was going
badly. The increasingly beleaguered and baffled Army leadership was telling
reporters that the insurgents consisted of five thousand Baathists loyal to
Saddam Hussein. When you understand that theyre organized in a cellular
structure, General John Abizaid, the head of the Central Command, declared,
that . . . they have access to a lot of money and a lot of ammunition,
youll understand how dangerous they are.
The American military and intelligence communities were having little
success in penetrating the insurgency. One internal report prepared for the
U.S. military, made available to me, concluded that the
insurgentsstrategic and operational intelligence has proven to be quite
good. According to the study:
Their ability to attack convoys, other vulnerable targets and particular
individuals has been the result of painstaking surveillance and
reconnaissance. Inside information has been passed on to insurgent cells
about convoy/troop movements and daily habits of Iraqis working with
coalition from within the Iraqi security services, primarily the Iraqi
Police force which is rife with sympathy for the insurgents, Iraqi
ministries and from within pro-insurgent individuals working with the CPAs
so-called Green Zone.
The study concluded, Politically, the U.S. has failed to date. Insurgencies
can be fixed or ameliorated by dealing with what caused them in the first
place. The disaster that is the reconstruction of Iraq has been the key
cause of the insurgency. There is no legitimate government, and it behooves
the Coalition Provisional Authority to absorb the sad but unvarnished fact
that most Iraqis do not see the Governing Councilthe Iraqi body appointed
by the C.P.A.as the legitimate authority. Indeed, they know that the true
power is the CPA.
By the fall, a military analyst told me, the extent of the Pentagons
political and military misjudgments was clear. Donald Rumsfelds
dead-enders now included not only Baathists but many marginal figures as
wellthugs and criminals who were among the tens of thousands of prisoners
freed the previous fall by Saddam as part of a prewar general amnesty. Their
desperation was not driving the insurgency; it simply made them easy
recruits for those who were. The analyst said, Wed killed and captured
guys who had been given two or three hundred dollars to pray and
spraythat is, shoot randomly and hope for the best. They werent really
insurgents but down-and-outers who were paid by wealthy individuals
sympathetic to the insurgency. In many cases, the paymasters were Sunnis
who had been members of the Baath Party. The analyst said that the
insurgents spent three or four months figuring out how we operated and
developing their own countermeasures. If that meant putting up a hapless guy
to go and attack a convoy and see how the American troops responded, theyd
do it. Then, the analyst said, the clever ones began to get in on the
action.
By contrast, according to the military report, the American and Coalition
forces knew little about the insurgency: Human intelligence is poor or
lacking . . . due to the dearth of competence and expertise. . . . The
intelligence effort is not coördinated since either too many groups are
involved in gathering intelligence or the final product does not get to the
troops in the field in a timely manner. The success of the war was at risk;
something had to be done to change the dynamic.
The solution, endorsed by Rumsfeld and carried out by Stephen Cambone, was
to get tough with those Iraqis in the Army prison system who were suspected
of being insurgents. A key player was Major General Geoffrey Miller, the
commander of the detention and interrogation center at Guantánamo, who had
been summoned to Baghdad in late August to review prison interrogation
procedures. The internal Army report on the abuse charges, written by Major
General Antonio Taguba in February, revealed that Miller urged that the
commanders in Baghdad change policy and place military intelligence in
charge of the prison. The report quoted Miller as recommending that
detention operations must act as an enabler for interrogation.
Millers concept, as it emerged in recent Senate hearings, was to Gitmoize
the prison system in Iraqto make it more focussed on interrogation. He also
briefed military commanders in Iraq on the interrogation methods used in
Cubamethods that could, with special approval, include sleep deprivation,
exposure to extremes of cold and heat, and placing prisoners in stress
positions for agonizing lengths of time. (The Bush Administration had
unilaterally declared Al Qaeda and other captured members of international
terrorist networks to be illegal combatants, and not eligible for the
protection of the Geneva Conventions.)
Rumsfeld and Cambone went a step further, however: they expanded the scope
of the sap, bringing its unconventional methods to Abu Ghraib. The commandos
were to operate in Iraq as they had in Afghanistan. The male prisoners could
be treated roughly, and exposed to sexual humiliation.
They werent getting anything substantive from the detainees in Iraq, the
former intelligence official told me. No names. Nothing that they could
hang their hat on. Cambone says, Ive got to crack this thing and Im tired
of working through the normal chain of command. Ive got this apparatus set
upthe black special-access programand Im going in hot. So he pulls the
switch, and the electricity begins flowing last summer. And its working.
Were getting a picture of the insurgency in Iraq and the intelligence is
flowing into the white world. Were getting good stuff. But weve got more
targetsprisoners in Iraqi jailsthan people who can handle them.
Cambone then made another crucial decision, the former intelligence official
told me: not only would he bring the saps rules into the prisons; he would
bring some of the Army military-intelligence officers working inside the
Iraqi prisons under the sapsauspices. So here are fundamentally good
soldiersmilitary-intelligence guysbeing told that no rules apply, the
former official, who has extensive knowledge of the special-access programs,
added. And, as far as theyre concerned, this is a covert operation, and
its to be kept within Defense Department channels.
The military-police prison guards, the former official said, included
recycled hillbillies from Cumberland, Maryland. He was referring to
members of the 372nd Military Police Company. Seven members of the company
are now facing charges for their role in the abuse at Abu Ghraib. How are
these guys from Cumberland going to know anything? The Army Reserve doesnt
know what its doing.
Who was in charge of Abu Ghraibwhether military police or military
intelligencewas no longer the only question that mattered. Hard-core
special operatives, some of them with aliases, were working in the prison.
The military police assigned to guard the prisoners wore uniforms, but many
othersmilitary intelligence officers, contract interpreters, C.I.A.
officers, and the men from the special-access programwore civilian clothes.
It was not clear who was who, even to Brigadier General Janis Karpinski,
then the commander of the 800th Military Police Brigade, and the officer
ostensibly in charge. I thought most of the civilians there were
interpreters, but there were some civilians that I didnt know, Karpinski
told me. I called them the disappearing ghosts. Id seen them once in a
while at Abu Ghraib and then Id see them months later. They were
nicetheyd always call out to me and say, Hey, remember me? How are you
doing? The mysterious civilians, she said, were always bringing in
somebody for interrogation or waiting to collect somebody going out.
Karpinski added that she had no idea who was operating in her prison system.
(General Taguba found that Karpinskis leadership failures contributed to
the abuses.)
By fall, according to the former intelligence official, the senior
leadership of the C.I.A. had had enough. They said, No way. We signed up
for the core program in Afghanistanpre-approved for operations against
high-value terrorist targetsand now you want to use it for cabdrivers,
brothers-in-law, and people pulled off the streetsthe sort of prisoners
who populate the Iraqi jails. The C.I.A.s legal people objected, and the
agency ended its sap involvement in Abu Ghraib, the former official said.
The C.I.A.s complaints were echoed throughout the intelligence community.
There was fear that the situation at Abu Ghraib would lead to the exposure
of the secret sap, and thereby bring an end to what had been, before Iraq, a
valuable cover operation. This was stupidity, a government consultant told
me. Youre taking a program that was operating in the chaos of Afghanistan
against Al Qaeda, a stateless terror group, and bringing it into a
structured, traditional war zone. Sooner or later, the commandos would bump
into the legal and moral procedures of a conventional war with an Army of a
hundred and thirty-five thousand soldiers.
The former senior intelligence official blamed hubris for the Abu Ghraib
disaster. Theres nothing more exhilarating for a pissant Pentagon civilian
than dealing with an important national security issue without dealing with
military planners, who are always worried about risk, he told me. What
could be more boring than needing the coöperation of logistical planners?
The only difficulty, the former official added, is that, as soon as you
enlarge the secret program beyond the oversight capability of experienced
people, you lose control. Weve never had a case where a special-access
program went sourand this goes back to the Cold War.
In a separate interview, a Pentagon consultant, who spent much of his career
directly involved with special-access programs, spread the blame. The White
House subcontracted this to the Pentagon, and the Pentagon subcontracted it
to Cambone, he said. This is Cambones deal, but Rumsfeld and Myers
approved the program. When it came to the interrogation operation at Abu
Ghraib, he said, Rumsfeld left the details to Cambone. Rumsfeld may not be
personally culpable, the consultant added, but hes responsible for the
checks and balances. The issue is that, since 9/11, weve changed the rules
on how we deal with terrorism, and created conditions where the ends justify
the means.
Last week, statements made by one of the seven accused M.P.s, Specialist
Jeremy Sivits, who is expected to plead guilty, were released. In them, he
claimed that senior commanders in his unit would have stopped the abuse had
they witnessed it. One of the questions that will be explored at any trial,
however, is why a group of Army Reserve military policemen, most of them
from small towns, tormented their prisoners as they did, in a manner that
was especially humiliating for Iraqi men.
The notion that Arabs are particularly vulnerable to sexual humiliation
became a talking point among pro-war Washington conservatives in the months
before the March, 2003, invasion of Iraq. One book that was frequently cited
was The Arab Mind, a study of Arab culture and psychology, first published
in 1973, by Raphael Patai, a cultural anthropologist who taught at, among
other universities, Columbia and Princeton, and who died in 1996. The book
includes a twenty-five-page chapter on Arabs and sex, depicting sex as a
taboo vested with shame and repression. The segregation of the sexes, the
veiling of the women . . . and all the other minute rules that govern and
restrict contact between men and women, have the effect of making sex a
prime mental preoccupation in the Arab world, Patai wrote. Homosexual
activity, or any indication of homosexual leanings, as with all other
expressions of sexuality, is never given any publicity. These are private
affairs and remain in private. The Patai book, an academic told me, was
the bible of the neocons on Arab behavior. In their discussions, he said,
two themes emergedone, that Arabs only understand force and, two, that the
biggest weakness of Arabs is shame and humiliation.
The government consultant said that there may have been a serious goal, in
the beginning, behind the sexual humiliation and the posed photographs. It
was thought that some prisoners would do anythingincluding spying on their
associatesto avoid dissemination of the shameful photos to family and
friends. The government consultant said, I was told that the purpose of the
photographs was to create an army of informants, people you could insert
back in the population. The idea was that they would be motivated by fear
of exposure, and gather information about pending insurgency action, the
consultant said. If so, it wasnt effective; the insurgency continued to
grow.
This shit has been brewing for months, the Pentagon consultant who has
dealt with saps told me. You dont keep prisoners naked in their cell and
then let them get bitten by dogs. This is sick. The consultant explained
that he and his colleagues, all of whom had served for years on active duty
in the military, had been appalled by the misuse of Army guard dogs inside
Abu Ghraib. We dont raise kids to do things like that. When you go after
Mullah Omar, thats one thing. But when you give the authority to kids who
dont know the rules, thats another.
... To be continued in the next post
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list