[Peace-discuss] Immediate withdrawal
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at uiuc.edu
Tue Dec 19 23:07:03 CST 2006
Why we stand for immediate withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Iraq
THE U.S. occupation of Iraq has not liberated the Iraqi people, but
has made life worse for most Iraqis.
Tens of thousands of U.S. service people have been killed or
maimed, and hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis have lost their
lives as a result of the U.S. invasion in 2003, the ongoing occupation,
and the violence unleashed by them.
Iraq's infrastructure has been destroyed, and U.S. plans for
reconstruction abandoned. There is less electricity, less clean drinking
water, and more unemployment today than before the U.S. invasion.
All of the justifications initially provided by the U.S. for waging
war on Iraq have been exposed as lies; the real reasons for the invasion
-- to control Iraq's oil reserves and to increase U.S. strategic
influence in the region -- now stand revealed.
The Bush administration has insisted again and again that
stability, democracy, and prosperity are around the next bend in the
road. But with each day that the U.S. stays, the violence and lack of
security facing Iraqis worsen. The U.S. says that it cannot withdraw its
military because Iraq will collapse into civil war if it does. But the
U.S. has deliberately stoked sectarian divisions in its ongoing attempt
to install a U.S.-friendly regime, thus driving Iraq towards civil war.
The November elections in the United States sent a clear message
that voters reject the Iraq war, and opinion polls show that seven in 10
Iraqis want the U.S. to leave sooner rather than later. Even most U.S.
military and political leaders agree that staying the course in Iraq is
a policy that is bound to fail.
Yet all the various alternative plans for Iraq now being discussed
in Washington, including those proposed by House and Senate Democrats,
aren't about withdrawing the U.S. military from Iraq. Rather, these
strategies are about continuing the pursuit of U.S. goals in Iraq and
the larger Middle East using different means.
Even the proposal to redeploy U.S. troops outside of Iraq, a plan
favored by many Democratic Party leaders, envisions continued U.S.
intervention inside Iraq.
With former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger insisting that a
military victory in Iraq is no longer possible and (Ret.) Lt. Gen.
William Odom calling for "complete withdrawal" of all U.S. troops, the
antiwar movement should demand no less than the immediate withdrawal of
the U.S. military -- as well as reparations to the Iraqi people, so they
can rebuild their own society and genuinely determine their own future.
Ali Abunimah
Gilbert Achcar
Michael Albert
Tariq Ali
Anthony Arnove
Noam Chomsky
Kelly Dougherty
Eve Ensler
Eduardo Galeano
Rashid Khalidi
Camilo MejÃa
Arundhati Roy
Howard Zinn
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list