[Peace-discuss] Re: Peace-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 16

[John Bambenek]

Oh yes, I was entirely overwhelmed by the intellectual oneupmanship of
saying I should get laid more often and calling me lardass.  I was
simple awed into submission by such brilliance and pearls of wisdom.

So, you support threatening violence against people you disagree with.
 Just wanted to make sure that the anti-war part of AWARE isn't really
against violence, it's just the wrong people getting killed.

j

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:15:32 -0500
From: Tracy Nectoux <tnectoux at uiuc.edu>
Subject: [Peace-discuss] Re: In Retrospect
Cc: peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
Message-ID: <44AEC0E4.5030006 at uiuc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

How revolting.

John, to publish private emails between yourself and someone, apparently
just to gain some sort of oneupmanship, is shameful.  It's the
equivalent of showing private letters.  It's immoral.  And it's very,
very low class.


I know it sucks to be continually insulted by someone more clever and
more witty than you.  Not to mention that she can spell.  But you chose
to be here, to bait this listserv.  What do you expect?  Why are you
acting like you're being picked on?  These are rhetorical questions;
please don't respond to them.  I don't like you, but your proud display
of your own stunning ignorance is embarrassing even to me.  I don't like
pitying scum.

You came to this listserv the day after (or the night of) the parade
just to crow and prove again what white trash you are.  Glory!  Someone
decided to push your buttons and made mincemeat of you.  Again.  Some more.

And how do you respond?  By proving what we all already know: that you
have no sense of right or wrong.

Shocking.