[Peace-discuss] Dr. Sami Al-Arian is Issued Maximum Sentence by
Judge
David Green
davegreen84 at yahoo.com
Wed May 3 10:49:18 CDT 2006
"During the course of his tirade, Moody resorted to
name-calling and personal insults. His vitriolic
speech reflected an extreme bias against the Arab and
Muslim community and a myopic view of the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict."
Dr. Sami Al-Arian is Issued Maximum Sentence by Judge
From: -[TBCJP]-
_tampabayjustice at yahoo.com_
(mailto:tampabayjustice at yahoo.com)
For Immediate Release
Tampa Bay Coalition for Justice and Peace
May 1, 2006
Judge Rejects Jury Verdict and Prosecution's
Recommendation,
Issues Maximum Sentence
TAMPA- At a sentencing hearing this morning at the
U.S. federal courthouse in Tampa, a judge issued Dr.
Sami Al-Arian a maximum sentence of 57 months, despite
recommendations by both government and defense
attorneys to give him the low end of the sentence or
46 months.
Before the sentencing, Dr. Al-Arian's attorney, Linda
Moreno, made a passionate appeal for the judge to
order Dr. Al-Arian's immediate release and
deportation on the basis of time-served: the 38
months he has been in prison, most of which were spent
in solitary confinement under the most punitive
conditions.
Dr. Al-Arian could have been released as early as May
23 under the low-end of the sentence. The maximum
adds another 10 months.
Moreno also asked that the judge, James Moody, enter
into the public record dozens of letters that were
sent on behalf of Dr. Al-Arian from family members,
students, colleagues and supporters worldwide,
urging him to give Dr. Al-Arian the minimum sentence.
Among the letters she cited is one by a prominent
Israeli academic, who wrote that Dr. Al-Arian is
"genuinely committed to bring peace and justice to
his and my country."
In his eloquent address to the court, Dr. Al-Arian
said: "This process affirmed my belief in the true
meaning of a democratic society, in which the
independence of the judiciary, the integrity
of the jury system, and the system of checks and
balances are upheld, despite intense political and
public pressures."
Unfortunately, in his remarks before the sentencing,
Judge Moody showed contempt for the jury process.
None of his accusations, which were unequivocally
rejected by the jury, appear anywhere in the actual
plea agreement for which Dr. Al-Arian was being
sentenced, or in the pre-sentencing report issued by
a probation officer. He regurgitated long disproven
accusations by the prosecution and even rehashed a
charge by a previously discredited FBI informant.
During the course of his tirade, Moody resorted to
name-calling and personal insults. His vitriolic
speech reflected an extreme bias against the Arab and
Muslim community and a myopic view of the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
On a day when all sides expected a swift and final
resolution to this painful chapter, the judge ensured
Dr. Al-Arian's and his family's continued suffering
and sparked outrage by friends,
colleagues and supporters. Following the vindictive
display, many experienced lawyers and legal experts
said they had never seen a judge carry himself in
such an unscrupulous manner.
Furthermore, the draconian sentence by the judge
caused a significant setback in the civil rights
struggle for Arab and Muslim Americans. It was also
the latest contribution to the deepening rift
between the U.S. and the Muslim world at a time when
dialogue and understanding are needed.
One supporter on the courthouse steps said: "He truly
represented the worst of America today."
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list