[Peace-discuss] Re: [Imc] Intentions

[C. G. Estabrook]

I gave permission for a piece to be published with clear conditions.  It 
was suggested to me that the Public i was not following those 
conditions, so I wrote to insist that "the public i does not have 
permission to publish the piece with changes or excisions that I have 
not approved.  I take this matter seriously and will sue for damages an 
editor who violates the clear conditions under which I submitted the 
piece."

You say that you did not know about the condition, but it was contained 
in the very passage you took offense to.  Nor did you say you were 
complying with it.


illyes at uiuc.edu wrote:
> Carl, I've gone over this already. But for the larger audience that
> you are pulling in:
> 
> 1) I was not told about your condition.
> 
> 2) It didn't matter, because I would assume it were the case anyhow,
> and not changed your text without your permission.
> 
> However, the Public i does not guarantee that what we publish will be
> exactly what you submitted, only that we will do our best to respect
> your wishes. As I have said already, if we find an error in what you
> write at the last minute before printing, we will correct it without
> checking with you. These correction are usually of spelling errors.
> If this is not acceptable to you, you should not submit your articles
> to the Public i.
> 
> Your threat to sue me personally for something I have not done nor
> even contemplated doing is extremely offensive. It is to me. It would
> be to anyone.
> 
> Bob _______________________________________________ IMC mailing list 
> IMC at lists.ucimc.org http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc