[Peace-discuss] Flyer for Saturday's Main Event
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at uiuc.edu
Thu Aug 30 21:02:17 CDT 2007
===[PAGE 1]===
DON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN -- STOP THE NEXT WAR NOW
AFTER INVADING AND OCCUPYING IRAQ,
THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS THREATENING TO ATTACK IRAN.
Suppose that--
--during the Eisenhower administration, in the 1950s, the secret
service of Iran engineered a coup against the United States, imprisoned
Eisenhower, and installed as President of the United States the son of a
Nazi collaborator;
--after more than twenty-five years of dictatorship, the American
people rose up, overthrew the Iranian-backed ruler and his secret
police, and established a popular government;
--Iran then supported an invasion of the U.S. by Mexico -- armed with
Iranian weapons of mass destruction -- resulting in an eight-year war
with more than two million American casualties (including all the
passengers of a commercial airliner, shot down by an Iranian warship in
U.S. territorial waters);
--after the conclusion of the war, Iran attacked Mexico and then for a
dozen years suppressed its economy and harassed it militarily, resulting
in the deaths of four million Mexican people;
--four years ago, Iran invaded Mexico outright, killing millions more,
and still occupies it; and
--now, frantically urged on by a nuclear-armed Canada, Iran threatens
to bomb American cities and nuclear plants. What would we expect from
Iran -- and from America?
Difficult as that is even to imagine, it all actually happened -- in
reverse (with Saddam Hussein's Iraq in the place of Mexico, Israel for
Canada, and casualties proportionate to populations). That is what the
United States has done to Iran. For Iranians today, it is the recent
history that they know (but we don't), not a fantasy.
And now, ringed around by the world's greatest military force armed with
nuclear weapons (by the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan, U.S.
client Israel, U.S. aircraft carrier fleets in the Persian Gulf, etc.),
the Iranians, who have invaded no other country, are threatened
continually by the U.S. and Israel with attacks from the air. It has
recently been revealed that, when the U.S. invaded Iraq, the Israeli
government was insisting that we should invade Iran instead.
Today there are indications that the threats are not just bluster from
the Bush administration and the leaders of both U.S. political parties.
Former CIA field officer Bob Baer has written a column for Time magazine
indicating that Washington officials expect an attack within the next
six months. "I've taken an informal poll inside the government," Baer
told Fox News. "The feeling is we will hit the Islamic Revolutionary
Guard Corps." His Time column also suggested that "as long as we have
bombers and missiles in the air, we will hit Iran's nuclear facilities."
In mid-July the Senate voted 97-0 for an amendment that states that "the
murder [by Iran] of members of the United States Armed Forces by a
foreign government or its agents is an intolerable act against the
United States." Asked about opposition from the American people to
escalation in and beyond Iraq, Vice President Cheney replied, “It won’t
stop us.” President Bush has said that Iran "is a government that has
proclaimed its desire to build a nuclear weapon," when in fact, Iran has
repeatedly said that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes. But
"having a radical Muslim theocracy in possession of nuclear weapons is
worse [than] launching some missile strikes into Iran," said Democratic
presidential candidate Barack Obama.
Only five years ago, the Administration made assertions about Iraqi
"weapons of mass destruction" and the "imminent threat" they posed to
the United States.. The mainstream media promoted those assertions
without question, and we went to war. But the claims were baseless and
proved false. Now, again without real evidence, the same Administration
is making similar claims about Iran, and again the media are promoting
them unchallenged. There is no reason to believe them this time --or to
allow the administration to make war again.
===[PAGE 2]===
"Many people think that an offensive by Washington would be foolish
because the Americans can hardly cope with Iraq. How are they going to
attack a country that is twice as big and has double the number of
inhabitants? But ... Washington's objective is not to invade and occupy
Iran. The central purpose is to eliminate it as an obstacle to
controlling the resources of Central Asia and the Persian Gulf. And, to
achieve that, it is not necessary to invade the country. It is enough to
destroy its military capacity, aerial and naval, something that the
armed forces of the United States and its few allies can achieve in some
week of selective bombardment ... In reply, Iran can unleash a nightmare
for the Americans in Iraq. But the sacrifice of additional ... soldiers
in Baghdad is not something that is going to stop the ... the
Bush-Cheney duo ... [and] the American people ... will be faced with a
fait accompli." --Alenjandro Nadal, “Blitzkrieg Against Iran,” La
Jornada, Mexico, 4 April 2007
"George Bush and his generals are laying out the case for a new war.
And there has been no resistance offered either by a vacationing
Congress or the major presidential candidates ... Who is pushing for
attacks on Iran? Israel and its lobby. Vice President Cheney. Sen. Joe
Lieberman, who has been calling for air strikes on Al Quds camps for
months. And a War Party facing lasting disgrace for having lied the
country into an unnecessary war, and for having assured the American
people it would be a 'cakewalk' ... If there is a rush to war here, it
is not on the part of Iran. As Bush is preparing for war on Iran, if he
has not already decided on war, where is Congress, which alone has the
constitutional power to authorize a war? Or has it given Bush and
Cheney another blank check?" --Patrick Buchanan, "Has Bush Boxed Himself
In?" Chronicles, Illinois, 28 August 2007
"The Bush administration, without irony, charges that Iran is
'meddling' in Iraq, otherwise presumably free from foreign interference
... the White House plans to brand the [Iranian] Revolutionary Guards as
a 'specially designated global terrorist' force, an unprecedented action
against a national military branch, authorizing Washington to undertake
a wide range of punitive actions.
"The sabre-rattling rhetoric about 'containing Iran' has escalated to
the point where both political parties and practically the whole U.S.
press corps accept it as legitimate and, in fact, honorable, that 'all
options are on the table,' to quote the leading [Democratic]
presidential candidates -- possibly even nuclear weapons. 'All options
on the table' means that Washington is threatening war. The UN Charter
outlaws 'the threat or use of force.' The United States, which has
chosen to become an outlaw state, disregards international laws and
norms. We're allowed to threaten anybody we want — and to attack anybody
we want.
"Unquestionably, Iran's government is reprehensible. The prospect that
Iran might develop nuclear weapons is deeply troubling. Though Iran has
every right to develop nuclear energy, no one — including the majority
of Iranians — wants it to have nuclear weapons. That would add to the
much more serious dangers presented by its near neighbors Pakistan,
India and Israel, all nuclear-armed with the blessing of the United States.
"The immediate fear is that by accident or design, Washington's war
planners or their Israeli surrogate might decide to escalate ... There
are many nonmilitary measures to 'contain' Iran, including a
de-escalation of rhetoric and hysteria all around, and agreeing to
negotiations in earnest for the first time — if indeed all options are
on the table." --Noam Chomsky, "Options on the Table," Khaleej Times,
India, 27 August 2007
CALL YOUR SENATORS, RICHARD DURBIN AND BARACK OBAMA, AND YOUR
CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, TIMOTHY JOHNSON, AT 800-839-5276 OR
202-224-3121.
TELL THEM TO OPPOSE ANY MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAN.
CONTACT THE LOCAL MEDIA AND DEMAND THAT THEIR NEWS REPORTS BE BASED ON
EVIDENCE,
NOT THE UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS OF THE ADMINISTRATION OR PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATES.
DON'T LET THE IRAQ DEBACLE BE REPEATED IN IRAN.
This flyer was prepared by members of AWARE (Anti-War Anti-Racism Effort),
a local Champaign-Urbana peace group <http://www.anti-war.net/>).
We meet every Sunday 5-6:30pm in the basement of the old post office in
Urbana.
Visitors and new members are welcome.
###
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fantasy flyer.rtf
Type: text/rtf
Size: 16884 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20070830/23e436f3/fantasyflyer-0001.rtf
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list