[Peace-discuss] Makes me want to see "Loose Change"

[Chuck Minne]

Right, all these renowned chemists and physicists like Chomsky et.al. are above trying to explain:
   
    
   The colossal clouds of concrete dust which literally explode from the TOPS of WCT1 and WTC2 and signal the collapse of the buildings. That there were no chunks of concrete on the ground, but only dust, is impossible to explain without explosives – the massive amounts of dust on the ground give no other explanation. But on a building that supposedly collapsed from heat exposure, you don’t need to be a scientist to figure out where the massive clouds of dust came from at the tops when the collapse started.  
   Jet fuel, kerosene, under ideal combustion conditions won’t come close to burning hot enough to soften steel. When a fuel is deprived of oxygen and is burning near or at its lower temperature limit, it makes black smoke. The smoke coming out of WTC1 and WTC2 is always black. Paint tests indicated that it burned at about 500°F, which is about as hot as a steel kitchen oven. They don’t collapse too often do they?  
   The hole in the Pentagon was too small for an airliner to fit through. There was no wreckage from the wings or tail outside the building. There were no airliner seats or luggage in the wreckage. Cockburn says photos exist showing an airliner hitting the building. Anybody ever seen one of those? One of those would certainly squelch the cruise missle/F-15 theory in a hurry.  
   In WTC7 there was minor fire damage on two floors, and there is no smoke visible in the videos of it collapsing. Silverstein said on PBS that he was told it was going to be “pulled.” It is a textbook picture of a controlled demolition.  
   All three WTC buildings fell at virtual free-fall speed, an impossibility if it happened the way that the offical report describes. The only way you can achieve free-fall speed is to destroy the supports simultaneously – which is exactly what controlled demolition does.  
   These buildings fell in their footprints. Again, that is impossible unless all of the vertical supports are destroyed simultaneously. Fire could not have done that. Do you think the relatively tiny fires in WTC7 could have destroyed every vertical support simultaneously?   
   There’s lots more.
   
There are laws of chemistry and physics that can’t be broken – even by Chomsky. Just ignored.

"Chas. 'Mark' Bee" <c-bee1 at itg.uiuc.edu> wrote:  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "C. G. Estabrook" 
 And I've never 
seen even one bit of 'evidence' from the 9/11-truthers that stood up to real 
inspection.

 
   
   
  
NOTICE: George W. Bush has issued Executive Orders allowing the National Security Agency to read this message and all other e-mail you receive or send---without warning, warrant or notice. Bush has ordered this to be done without any legislative or judicial oversight. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of President Bush and other government officials who are involved in this illegal and unconstitutional activity. from: Information Clearing House





  
---------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
 Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/private/peace-discuss/attachments/20070222/eaeea1b2/attachment.html