[Peace-discuss] How to get out now
Ricky Baldwin
baldwinricky at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 8 13:56:56 CST 2007
I also think such a bill could include diverting funds
from war directly to veterans' benefits. Up the ante.
Sort of killing three birds...
But the basic point is a winner. It's really not that
hard to do this.
Ricky
--- "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> [William Lind writes in Counterpunch today that it
> is not difficult] to
> design legislative language that both ends the war
> and supports the
> troops. All the Democratic majorities in Congress
> have to do is
> condition the funding for the Iraq war with the
> words, "No funds may be
> obligated or expended except for the withdrawal of
> all American forces
> from Iraq, and for such force protection actions as
> may be necessary
> during that withdrawal." If Bush vetoes the bill, he
> vetoes continued
> funding for the war. If he signs the bill, ignores
> the legislative
> language and keeps fighting the war in the same old
> way, he sets himself
> up for impeachment. What's not to like?
>
> For the Democrats, what's not to like is anything
> that might actually
> end the war before the 2008 elections. The
> Republicans have 21 Senate
> seats up in 2008, and if the Iraq war is still going
> on, they can count
> on losing most of them, along with the Presidency
> and maybe 100 more
> seats in the House. 2008 could be the new 1932,
> leaving the Republican
> Party a permanent minority for twenty years. From
> the standpoint of the
> Democratic Party's leadership, a few thousand more
> dead American troops
> is a small price to pay for so glowing a political
> victory.
>
> Ironically, the people who should be most desperate
> to end the war are
> Congressional Republicans. Their heads are on the
> chopping block. But
> they remain so paralyzed by the White House that
> they cannot act even to
> save themselves. The March 2 Washington Times
> reported that
>
> Republicans in Congress -- including most who have
> defected from
> President Bush's plan to send reinforcements to Iraq
> -- have closed
> ranks and are prepared to thwart the Democrats'
> continued efforts to
> undermine the war strategy
>
> All but one of the seven Senate Republicans that
> backed the anti-surge
> resolution in their chamber say they will not
> support any funding cuts.
>
> The likely result of all this Washington dodging is
> that events on the
> ground in Iraq and elsewhere will outrun the
> political process. That in
> turn means a systemic crisis, the abandonment of
> both parties by their
> bases and a possible left-right grass roots alliance
> against the corrupt
> and incompetent center. In that possibility may lie
> the nation's best hope.
>
> ###
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>
http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list