[Peace-discuss] Quit the Party
John W.
jbw292002 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 29 19:34:36 CDT 2007
At 04:35 PM 9/29/2007, Laurie Solomon wrote:
> >Nah, you weren't a spoiler if you voted in Illinois. But as I understand
> it, Gore would have gotten in -- even w/ the voter fraud giving FL to
> Bush -- if Nader votes hadn't thrown election to Bush in those states.
> Chomsky warned voters NOT to do that again in 2004 b/c things had gotten
> too dangerous, and many others asked Nader not to run again for the same
> reason.
>
>Trying hard to stay out of this; but I do have to make an observation. To
>tell people that they should not for practical political reasons follow
>their principles when voting or supporting substantive positions because
>they might be spoilers with respect to another candidate's or substantive
>position's chance of winning sounds like a very unprincipled stance and
>very much political pragmatism as usual. It tends to remind me of the old
>story about the liberal southerners, who upon acquiring and holding seats
>of power, authority, and position in the halls of government, sought to
>pursue moderation and going slow with respect to reduction and elimination
>of racial segregation and discrimination; they told the Blacks that they
>should cease to protest and making demands for immediate action because if
>they continued they would get the racist conservatives back in power.
>
>Maybe, just maybe, given the evidence of the establishment to maintain a
>given policy despite changes in the power elites in government (i.e., both
>houses of the Congress from republican control to Dem control) one might
>consider attempting to organize a general boycott of elections period
>until such time as the people can actually exercise some control over
>their officials and effectively allow for proportional representation of
>all political positions rather than being forced to move the middle ground
>and support the establishment's notions of being moderate and going slow
>in making changes. Not to vote is a form of voting.
Just so. The only problem with a boycott on voting is that politicians
don't give a damn if they're elected with only 10% of the eligible voters
actually voting. A boycott on paying TAXES would be about 50,000 times
more effective.
John W.
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list