[Peace-discuss] Not that Obama's any better

[John W.]

At 09:38 AM 4/29/2008, C. G. Estabrook wrote:

>Liberals entertain the fantasy that reality is subject to their wills.
>
>Solipsism is a constant temptation to them.


Oh, GOD Carl, I LOVE it when you do the pot-kettle-black thing!!!  :-P



>Jenifer Cartwright wrote:
>
>>"True" only in YOUR reality, Carl :-)
>>
>>*/"C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at uiuc.edu>/* wrote:
>>     No, the subject line is explained by the fact that it's true, and 
>> the opposite
>>     implication is false.
>>
>>     Jenifer Cartwright wrote:
>>      > Three hours, huh. Well, maybe that explains the subject line, 
>> then. That
>>      > kinda nasty stuff rubs off real easy.
>>      > --Jenifer
>>
>>
>>      > */"C. G. Estabrook" /* wrote:
>>      >
>>      > But it's important that a certain primitive psychological 
>> splitting doesn't lead
>>      > people to imagine that Hillary's awfulness makes Obama look good.
>>      >
>>      > And BTW I had a long auto trip last week and listened to 
>> Limbaugh's full three-
>>      > hour show. It's interesting to hear how he does it. What he says 
>> is nuts and
>>      > worse, but he has polished a rhetorical form that's supple and 
>> inventive. It's
>>      > good audio theatre. --CGE
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > Jenifer Cartwright wrote:
>>      > > Good article, Carl. Thanks for posting it. However, the subject 
>> line
>>      > > should have read "Hillary Strangelove" as that's what the 
>> editorial is
>>      > > about. "Not that Obama's any better" is off-topic and soooo 
>> totally Rush
>>      > > Limbaugh/Bill O'Reilly.
>>      > > --Jenifer