[Peace-discuss] Venezuela and the Washington Post
Brussel Morton K.
mkbrussel at comcast.net
Fri Mar 28 12:21:00 CDT 2008
Letter to the Washington Post…
Letter from Venezuela’s Communications Minister to the Washington Post
Andrés Izarra
Jackson Diehl
Deputy Editor, Editorial Page
The Washington Post
1150 15th Street NW
Washington, DC 20071
March 25, 2008
Dear Mr. Diehl,
Over the past several years, we have informed you of our concerns
regarding the hostile, distorted and inaccurate coverage of Venezuela
in your newspaper, and particularly on the Editorial Page.
Previously, we communicated our alarm at the unbalanced reporting and
writing on Venezuela during the period 2000-2006, which evidenced one-
sided analyses and false claims regarding President Chávez’s
tendencies and events within the country. Since then, however, the
Post coverage has gotten worse. More editorials and OpEds have been
written this past year about Venezuela than ever before, 98% of which
are negative, critical, and aggressive and contain false or
manipulated information. We are therefore led to believe that the
Washington Post is promoting an anti-Venezuela, anti-Chávez agenda.
President Chávez has been referred to in Washington Post editorials
and OpEds during the past year as a “strongman”, “crude populist”,
“autocrat”, “clownish”, “increasingly erratic”, “despot” and
“dictator” on 8 separate occasions and his government has been
referred to 7 times as a “dictatorship”, a “repressive regime” or a
form of “authoritarianism”. Such claims are not only false, but they
are also extremely dangerous. The U.S. government has used such
classifications to justify wars, military interventions, coup d’etats
and other regime change techniques over the past several decades.
Far from a dictatorship, President Chávez’s government has the
highest popularity rating in the Venezuela’s contemporary history and
Chávez has won three presidential elections with landslide victories
and several other important elections, including a recall referendum
against his mandate in August 2004, which he won with a clear 60-40
majority. Hugo Chávez is the first president in Venezuela’s history
to include the country’s majority poor population in key decision and
policy-making. The creation of community councils that govern locally
and the increase in voter participation are clear signs of a vibrant,
open democracy, demonstrating that Venezuela is far from a dictatorship.
The Editorial Page inaccuracies and distortions extend beyond the
mere labeling of President Chávez. On more than 11 occasions,
editorials and OpEds have falsely claimed that President Chávez
“controls the courts and the television media”. Venezuela has five
branches of government - all of which are autonomous from one other
by Constitutional mandate: the Executive, the Legislative, the
Judiciary, the Electoral and the People’s Power. Unlike the United
States, which allows for the Executive to appoint supreme court
justices, in Venezuela, the high court magistrates are determined
through a selection process and a vote in the National Assembly. The
Executive branch in Venezuela plays no role in the assignment of
judges to the courts. Communications media in Venezuela continues to
be majority controlled by the private sector, despite what the Post
Editorial Page claims.
Post editorials and OpEds also erroneously referred to the
constitutional reform package last December on more than 8 occasions
as enabling President Chávez to “rule indefinitely” or become a “de
facto president-for-life”. The Constitutional reform did seek to
abolish term limits, but not elections. Venezuelans would still have
the right and duty to nominate candidates and vote for them in
transparent electoral processes. Interestingly, the Post made no
similar accusations against President Alvaro Uribe of Colombia when
he twice made moves to change constitutional law to permit reelection
to a second term. Uribe succeded in 2004 and is now again seeking to
amend that law so he can run for a third term. Where are the Post’s
cries about dictatorship and de facto president-for-life in Colombia?
The Post has also severely manipulated and outrighted censored
information about economic growth in Venezuela. Twice, recent
publications on the editorial page described the Venezuelan
government economic measures as “disastrous, crackpot economic
policies”. Under Chávez’s economic policies, extreme poverty has
diminished to an all-time low of 9.4% (2007) from a high of 42.5% in
1996. Unemployment has been reduced to 6.9% (2007) from 16.6% in
1998. Minimum wage has been raised substantially during the Chávez
government to become one of the highest in the developing world, and
there has been a significant reduction in Venezuela’s public debt.
Chávez also paid off Venezuela’s loans to the World Bank and
International Monetary Fund and has increased investment in the
nation’s agricultural production industry.
Nevertheless, the Post fails to reflect any of these positive,
progressive advances in its coverage and statements on Venezuela.
Instead, Post editorials are dedicated to accusing President Chávez
of engaging in an “arms race” (4 occasions), “violating human
rights” (3 times), “facilitating/endorsing drug-trafficking” (6
times) and “promoting an anti-American agenda” (6 times). Worst of
all, despite Chávez’s own statements to the contrary, the Post
continues to perpetuate the dangerous myth that Chávez is an “anti-
semite” “aligned with terrorist nations or groups” (9 times).
Mr. Diehl, you should certainly know that the United States is
currently waging an international war against terrorism. Within that
framework, the Bush administration has clearly stated that those
nations associated with or friendly to terrorist states or groups can
be subject to preemptive invasion or intervention. Are you seeking
such an end in Venezuela?
Your editorial on February 15, 2008, “Mr. Chávez’s Bluff”, goes one
step too far. The piece is an outright call for a boycott of
Venezuelan oil, an act that would irreparably harm both the peoples
of Venezuela and the United States. As the Post applauds the mafia
tactics of one of the world’s wealthiest corporations, ExxonMobil,
it’s evident that its allegiance lies with corporate profits over
people’s rights.
And your latest editorial on March 5, 2008, “Allies of Terrorism” is
well beyond a mere criticism of President Chávez’s policies; it’s a
direct threat to the people of Venezuela. By accepting at face value
- with absolutely no investigation or verification - the documents
alleged to have been found on a computer belonging to Rául Reyes from
the FARC, the Post recklessly condemns both Venezuela and Ecuador as
nations that promote and harbor terrorism and justifies the most
violating, reviled and dangerous Bush doctrine of modern times:
Preventive War. By comparing Colombia’s violation of Ecuador’s
sovereignty to a US attack against al-Qaeda, the Post shamelessly
validates the most irrational war in history and calls for its
expansion into Latin America. We find the Post’s defense of the
violation of Ecuador’s sovereignty and its satisfaction with such
aggressive - and illegal - tactics, together with the warning that
Venezuela is in “danger”, extremely disturbing.
We are outraged with the Washington Post’s editorial coverage of
Venezuela. The Post was once the bastion of genuine investigative
reporting and truth-seeking. Those days are well gone and the
Washington Post has now become nothing more than a tabloid serving
special interests. The noble principles Eugene Meyer envisioned for
the Washington Post in 1935, including “telling the truth as nearly
as the truth can be ascertained”, “telling ALL the truth so far as it
can be learned, concerning the important affairs of America and the
world and “the newspaper shall not be the ally of any special
interest, but shall be fair and free and wholesome in its outlook on
public affairs and public persons,” have been violated by editors
like you, Mr. Diehl, who have chosen to promote a harmful personal
agenda instead of ensure the ongoing greatness of your newspaper.
Sincerely,
Andrés Izarra
Journalist
Minister of Communication and Information
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20080328/f42b1685/attachment.htm
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list