[Peace-discuss] Bush-Obama terrorism in AfPak
Neil Parthun
lennybrucefan at gmail.com
Mon Oct 13 11:42:01 CDT 2008
I'm interested in seeing the divergence.
War in Iraq
OBAMA: Continued presence, use of 'private contractors' (read:
mercenaries)
MCCAIN: Continued presence, use of 'private contractors'
War in Pakistan
OBAMA: Willing to make military incursions into Pakistan
MCCAIN: Willing to make military incursions into Pakistan (but won't
announce it first)
War in Afghanistan
OBAMA: Need to send more troops to fight the 'right war' that we got
distracted from fighting
MCCAIN: Continue to fight the war
Israel:
OBAMA: Fervent support
MCCAIN: Fervent support
Gay Marriage
OBAMA: Oppose
MCCAIN: Oppose
Immigration
OBAMA: Punish immigrants coming into the country
MCCAIN: Punish immigrants coming into the country
Drug War
OBAMA: Continue
MCCAIN: Continue
Education
OBAMA: Tweak NCLB and high stakes testing
MCCAIN: Keep NCLB and high stakes testing
Health Care
OBAMA: Continue for profit method that keeps people uninsured
MCCAIN: Continue for profit method that keeps people uninsured
And for Supreme Court justices -- the President's pick and political
beliefs do not always influence the work of that justice. Harry
Blackmun was appointed by Nixon and he wrote the majority opinion for
Roe v. Wade. Warren Burgher was also appointed by Nixon. Brennan
got added by noted Republican President Eisenhower. Eisenhower also
appointed a person that he believed to be a "conservative" justice --
Earl Warren who became one of the most outspoken 'activist judges'.
Gerald Ford put John Paul Stevens in. Hell, even Reagan's appointees
(O'Connor and Kennedy) have voted to strike down state restrictions
on abortion, state anti-sodomy laws and to uphold campaign finance
reform along with favoring the use of international law to interpret
the Constitution. HW Bush's pick of David Souter was seen as a "home
run for conservatism" yet he has become a fairly liberal judge. So,
hand wringing about Supreme Court justice picks should not always
guide a decision because Republican presidents have brought out some
justices whose decisions are loved by the progressive left (Brown v.
Board, Roe v. Wade, etc.).
And let's not bring out the specter of abortion. There have been
plenty of Rethuglican candidates that ran on anti-choice platforms
and the right to free choice is still standing today. 8 years of
Reagan, 4 years of Bush Sr., 8 years of Bush Jr. and it is still here
after all of them said it was a primary goal to institute a "culture
of life". The abortion issue is a great fiddle upon which the Dems
and Repubs play the voters for votes through scare tactics.
/still looking for major differences between Obama and McCain
//looking over hill, over dale
///thinks I've made my point and is off to go read some Jemele Hill
columns and DWIL at Sports on My Mind
////slashies
Its not the act of seeing with our own eyes alone; its correctly
comprehending what we see,
Neil
We absolutely have to refuse to attribute any kind of permanency to
that which is simply because it is.
[angela v. davis, 1944-]
Finish each day and be done with it. You have done what you could.
Some blunders and absurdities have crept in; forget them as soon as
you can. Tomorrow is a new day. You shall begin it serenely and with
too high a spirit to be encumbered with your old nonsense.
[ralph waldo emerson, 1803-1882]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20081013/a834ccd1/attachment.html
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list