[Peace-discuss] taxes for school

LAURIE SOLOMON LAURIE at ADVANCENET.NET
Thu Oct 23 14:53:24 CDT 2008


> MAYBE???

 

Well Jenifer, you woulds not want me coming off sounding to authoritative or
too judgmental  now would you?  J  I am willing to let everyone else know
all there is to know; and I will settle for knowing all the rest.  J

 

From: peace-discuss-bounces at lists.chambana.net
[mailto:peace-discuss-bounces at lists.chambana.net] On Behalf Of Jenifer
Cartwright
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 1:43 PM
To: 'John W.'; 'C. G. Estabrook'; LAURIE SOLOMON
Cc: 'Peace Discuss'
Subject: RE: [Peace-discuss] taxes for school

 


MAYBE???

--- On Thu, 10/23/08, LAURIE SOLOMON <LAURIE at ADVANCENET.NET> wrote:

From: LAURIE SOLOMON <LAURIE at ADVANCENET.NET>
Subject: RE: [Peace-discuss] taxes for school
To: "'John W.'" <jbw292002 at gmail.com>, "'C. G. Estabrook'"
<galliher at uiuc.edu>
Cc: "'Peace Discuss'" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 12:49 PM

Maybe in this country (and even in the industrialized world) we have gotten
too fat and really need less of everything -  including lower standards of
living, conspicuous consumption, businesses whose focus is on producing
profits and not good and services, employment at routine bureaucratic "glass
bead" types of jobs which service and remedy problems of our own making and
design ( accountants, lawyers, CEOs, advertising and PR departmental
personnel, etc. come to mind).  

 

From: peace-discuss-bounces at lists.chambana.net
[mailto:peace-discuss-bounces at lists.chambana.net] On Behalf Of John W.
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 12:01 PM
To: C. G. Estabrook
Cc: Peace Discuss
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] taxes for school

 

 

On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:52 PM, C. G. Estabrook <
<mailto:galliher at uiuc.edu> galliher at uiuc.edu> wrote:

Income inequality has grown at an increasing rate for years. We must demand
a
tax program that redistributes wealth in a more equitable fashion.

If you tax something, you get less of it. Tax (disparate) wealth, not income
or
consumption. --CGE


The counter argument, of course, is that if you tax business you get less of
it, which means fewer jobs, etc.

There's no "right" answer, especially in this global marketplace with no
sense of community or mutual accountabiity.  Just about everyone wants to
arrogate the assets to himself/herself, and pass the liabilities on to
someone else.  This recent bailout is only the most glaring and hypocritical
example of it.

John Wason


 

Karen Medina wrote:

 

it increases the cost of clothing, school supplies, toiletries and other
basic items.


Yeah, that is another part I dislike. The families with more people in
school
would pay more tax.

We all benefit from educating the young. WE ALL benefit.

We all need to invest in educating the children, and we all need to be
offended when the education system is broken.

-karen medina

 

_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20081023/7d187132/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list