[Peace-discuss] Constitutionality
Bob Illyes
illyes at uiuc.edu
Wed Sep 24 13:05:00 CDT 2008
Lots of things were assumed by the authors of the Constitution, and not
written down. This doesn't mean that they are not implicit in the
Constitution, but only that the authors assumed that the interpreters were
somewhat educated and weren't idiots.
For example, the Constitution doesn't specify that a simple majority vote
will pass a bill (let me know if you find this- I've looked and failed). It
also doesn't specify how a law will be determined to be unconstitutional or
more generally what should happen if there are two laws that contradict
each other. There are at least five remedies for unconstitutional laws: the
President can refuse to enforce them, the Congress can change them, the
courts can tell us what to do about them, the people can engage in civil
disobedience, and the Constitution can be amended. All of these remedies
have been used.
John's claim that a law is unconstitutional only when found so in court is
rather like saying that your wife isn't cheating on you unless a judge agrees.
Bob
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list