[Peace-discuss] Obama's war, bailouts must be opposed
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Wed Apr 1 15:38:00 CDT 2009
[From Chris Floyd. His blog, Empire Burlesque, can be found at
www.chris-floyd.com. --CGE]
...[On Friday, March 27] Barack Obama announced, with a flourish of falsehoods
and fearmongering, his grand plans to escalate the "Af-Pak" War.
Not that I was surprised by any of it: both the truth-abusing rhetoric and the
war-expanding intentions have been hallmarks of Team Obama's Afghanistan
policies since the early days of his presidential campaign. And Obama, eager to
establish his tough-guy cojones, was killing civilians in Pakistan and ordering
up an Afghan surge just as soon as he climbed into the Imperial cockpit. His
much-vaunted "strategic review" was simply a bureaucratic exercise to determine
how best to tweak and refine the policies already adopted by the Bush
Administration and its military managers -- all of whom were of course retained
by Obama. Again, this was to be expected. After all, "continuity" has been his
watchword -- or rather, it became his watchword right after he was swept into
office as the self-proclaimed embodiment of the public's desperate longing for
change.
Even so, to see the expansion of the Af-Pak War finally, formally promulgated,
and to realize what this really means, not in terms of the ludicrous political
theater of Washington and the media, not in the war-game fantasies of
think-tankers and armchair warriors, but in the actual costs -- the death and
suffering of thousands of innocent people, the ruinous chaos and the violent
hatred engendered, the massive financial corruption and gargantuan debt added to
our already corrupt and bankrupt system, the further coarsening and
brutalization and militarization of our society, and again, because it bears
repeating, the physical and emotional destruction of countless human beings
whose only crime was to be born in a region targeted by the Great Gamesters of
the world, the warlords in turbans and those in Brooks Brothers suits, the
gangsters in the alleys and in the corridors of power -- this is a bitter and
sickening thing. And no amount of foreknowledge or cynicism makes it any easier
to bear. The day it gets easier, the day your cynicism makes you shrug off the
horror -- "So what else is new?" -- is the day your soul dies.
The wagon train with its rotting cargo keeps lurching on. A change of drivers
has not meant a change in direction. As Tom Englehardt points out, in both
foreign policy and on the economic front, the Obama Administration is trying
frantically to preserve an imperial system that is cracking under the weight of
its own immoral excesses, its own arrogance and willful ignorance. But owing to
the latter, their only solution is to do more of the same things that have
plunged the system into severe crisis.
In fact, the domestic side of their efforts is even more radical, more shocking
than Obama's dull-witted "continuity" in Terror War. The new administration is
openly transferring trillions of dollars to a small core of financial elites, in
effect placing the rest of the country into a state of economic peonage to these
remote and unaccountable overlords -- who have, astonishingly, used the fear and
suffering created by their own actions as an opportunity to take their
domination of society to even greater heights. What Obama and his economic team
are abetting is, as Simon Johnson and others have noted, nothing less than an
oligarchic coup d'etat. I lived through one of those in Russia in the 1990s, and
it was not a pretty sight. And again, because the scale of the American power
structure is so much greater, so too will be the far-reaching, long-lasting
consequences of this coup.
I've never been a starry-eyed idealist. I've never preached the counsel of
seeking the perfect at the expense of the good. And I've never believed that any
single politician or administration could take office and magically transform
the nature of the American empire overnight. I acknowledge the aptness of the
metaphor used by many of Obama's defenders: the image of a sea captain, beset by
virulent opponents on the bridge, struggling to turn a vast ocean liner in the
opposite direction, in the midst of a raging storm. That would indeed take a
long time, and tremendous effort, and require stoic patience from the passengers.
But that is not what is happening. The long, hard, thankless effort that it
would take to roll back the bloated global empire of bases and curtail the power
of the oligarchy (for you can't do one without the other) has not even begun.
Obama is not trying to wrest the ship of state toward a new direction; he is
deliberately and willingly continuing on the same disastrous, destructive course
as before. Every day carries us further and further away from the shore, and
makes any effort to reverse course that much harder -- if indeed, it is still
possible at all.
[Full article at http://www.counterpunch.org/]
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list