[Peace-discuss] International crime

C. G. Estabrook galliher at illinois.edu
Sun Apr 26 21:38:13 CDT 2009


[The story of the week seems to me to be the Obama administration's threats 
against Pakistan.  The bastards -- Obama, Clinton, Gates, Petraeus -- made it 
clear that they were going to kill people, if the Pakistani army didn't.  Of 
course they have no legal right to do so. --CGE]

	From The Sunday Times
	April 26, 2009
	‘Stop the Taliban now – or we will’

The US got tough with Pakistan as terrorists moved to within 60 miles of the capital

Christina Lamb in Washington and Daud Khattak in Buner

AMERICA made clear last week that it would attack Taliban forces in their Swat 
valley stronghold unless the Pakistan government stopped the militants’ advance 
towards Islamabad.

A senior Pakistani official said the Obama administration intervened after 
Taliban forces expanded from Swat into the adjacent district of Buner, 60 miles 
from the capital.

The Pakistani Taliban’s inroads raised international concern, particularly in 
Washington, where officials feared that the nuclear-armed country, which is 
pivotal to the US war against the Taliban in Afghanistan and against Al-Qaeda, 
was rapidly succumbing to Islamist extremists.

“The implicit threat - if you don’t do it, we may have to - was always there,” 
said the Pakistani official. He said that under American pressure, Pakistan’s 
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency told the Taliban to withdraw from Buner 
on Friday.

However, reports yesterday indicated that the Taliban withdrawal was less than 
total. As a result, hundreds of thousands of people in the district were still 
at the mercy of armed militants and their restrictive interpretation of Islamic law.

American military and intelligence forces already run limited ground and air 
operations on Pakistani soil along the border with Afghanistan. But an overt 
military operation such as that threatened in Swat, away from the border, would 
mark a major escalation.

The official said last week’s outspoken remarks by Hillary Clinton, the US 
secretary of state, were “calculated to ramp up the pressure on Pakistan” to 
take action. Clinton warned that the terrorists’ advance had created a “mortal 
threat” to world security.

She was one of several American political and military leaders to use unusually 
strong language about Pakistan’s failure to curb the Taliban. Admiral Mike 
Mullen, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, who visited Pakistan, said he was 
“extremely concerned” about the developments and that the situation was 
“definitely worse” than two weeks ago.

General David Petraeus, of US Central Command, which oversees Afghanistan - to 
which America is about to commit 17,000 more troops - said Al-Qaeda and Taliban 
extremists in Pakistan posed an “ever more serious threat to Pakistan’s very 
existence”.

These remarks have stung Pakistan. Husain Haqqani, the ambassador to Washington, 
accused the Obama administration of making it harder for his country to fight 
the Taliban.

“The US needs to relate its comments to the ground realities in Pakistan instead 
of the mood in Washington,” he said. “Most Pakistanis are not supportive of the 
Taliban way of life, but at the same time widespread anti-Americanism confuses 
many Pakistanis into having a conflicting view.

“We want to turn that view around but the US and its leaders must help us to do 
that.”

The latest crisis stems from a controversial ceasefire the government signed in 
February to end months of vicious fighting between the Taliban and the army in 
Swat that caused significant loss of life and an exodus from what had once been 
a tourist centre. Some 500,000 now live outside Swat, a third of them in camps 
that used to shelter refugees from the fighting in Afghanistan.

In return for the imposition of sharia [Islamic law] in Swat, the Taliban agreed 
to disengage, disarm and stop menacing people. But it was from Swat last week 
that their fighters overran Buner with about 500 well-armed men under a hardline 
commander, Maulvi Khalil.

As in Swat, once his forces had established themselves, Khalil began to impose 
the movement’s repressive rules on what had once been a peaceful valley. He 
ordered girls over seven to wear veils and directed men to keep their women 
inside and to grow beards. He banned music. In several villages the Taliban were 
snatching mobile phones on the pretext that they had musical ring tones or 
photos of women on them.

The Taliban stole livestock, took vehicles belonging to government officials and 
ransacked the offices of some local nongovernment organisations. In a phone 
call, Khalil denied the Taliban were terrorists. He said: “We’ve raised the arms 
to spread the message of Allah. This is the responsibility of each and every 
Muslim.” But residents fear it is just a matter of time before their daughters 
are forced to marry Taliban commanders, a process that has begun already in 
Swat, along with public floggings.

On Friday, in a much publicised agreement with the government, Khalil agreed to 
withdraw. Local residents said the withdrawal was incomplete. He had left men 
behind to supplement local armed Taliban groups and newly recruited sympathisers.

“There is a collective holding of breath,” said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty 
International’s Asia director, from Islamabad. “The Taliban edicts are still in 
force and the dismantling of the civilian infrastructure is still very much in 
effect, so a lot of doctors, midwives, civil servants have left and people are 
hunkering down because they fear an army operation.”

The government sent a few hundred paramilitaries to Buner last week but they 
kept a low profile. It has not sent any troops. The Americans want the 
government to shift troops from the India-Pakistan border to meet the Taliban 
threat, but frightened residents of Buner fear an army operation would cause 
civilian casualties.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6168940.ece


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list