[Peace-discuss] When You Comin' Back, Red Ryder?

Mon Aug 24 15:55:09 CDT 2009

Of course, if AWARE were serious enough and influential enough, it would
pressure for permission and authorization  from the Faculty Senate and
Administration to formally set up and conduct such courses itself on those
subjects within both the University - and also do the same with respect to
the informal setting of the YMCA communiversity.   The establishment of such
seminars for the purpose of discussing topics such as this need not be made
a for credit course unless one buys into the notion that all learning and
research in a university setting has to have a practical value and pragmatic
end.

From: peace-discuss-bounces at lists.chambana.net
[mailto:peace-discuss-bounces at lists.chambana.net] On Behalf Of Morton K.
Brussel
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58 AM
To: Ricky Baldwin
Cc: Peace-discuss; E. Wayne Johnson
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] When You Comin' Back, Red Ryder?

The "Why?" of wars and and the militaristic mentality should be a ripe
subject for inquiry at our great universities, but I've not noticed efforts
to illuminate this vital topic for the populations or students here or
elsewhere. It would be like a Department of Peace that Kucinich has been
advocating. It seems to be too delicate a subject to broach in our
institutions. If AWARE were resourceful enough it could conceive of putting
together a conference on the subject. 

--mkb

On Aug 24, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Ricky Baldwin wrote:

Easy to repeat, perhaps ad nauseam.  Harder to demonstrate.

I'd argue there was progress through the 1960s and 70s, but as Karen points
out, these victories are rarely permanent.  Eternal vigilance and all that.

Ricky

"Speak your mind even if your voice shakes." - Maggie Kuhn

--- On Sun, 8/23/09, E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag> wrote:

From: E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag>
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] When You Comin' Back, Red Ryder?
To: "Jenifer Cartwright" <jencart13 at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Peace-discuss" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>
Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 12:18 PM

Jenifer,

For there to be any real progress there has to first be the admission that
there has not been any real progress in how wars can be prevented, 
how they are supposed to be fought, what's permissable re treatment of
prisoners, how governments are supposed to function... with consequences for
breaches.

Mr. Bush continued Clinton's war, and Mr. Obama continues Mr. Bush's war,
and torturing and immoral detention,
and dysfunction oligarchic government continues in its arrogant manner to
trod down the people under the
iron boot of authoritarian control.  

Whereas through GWBush the oligarchy scourged us with whips in their
deceits, 
through Obama and their other minions the oligarchy seeks
to scourge us with scorpions in the name of "hope".

I dont see the progress you speak of Jenifer.  It's time to stop pretending.
It aint there, and the movement has been lullabied to sleep on a pillow of
lies.

It's time to quit distributing the sedatives.  The anti-war movement is
co-opted 
and it's being co-opted from within.

Hope deferred makes the heart sick, but hope begins again when people wake
up.

Wayne

On 8/23/2009 11:34 AM, Jenifer Cartwright wrote: 

John,

What you say is true if it's true that the best predictor of the future is
the past... But saying that a thing will be true because it has always been
true also invites complacency... and it overlooks that there HAS been
progress in how wars can be prevented, how they are supposed to be fought,
what's permissable re treatment of prisoners, how governments are supposed
to function... with consequences for breaches. No, not a perfect system, of
course, and yes, there are violations... but it's a start. The real danger
-- hope? -- is that the way wars CAN be fought will be so horrific that
major wars will be bro't to a halt, OR -- the main fear -- that humankind
will blow itself off the planet (yes, even before it destroys the planet, or
what's left of it at that point).

Have a good day... and let's all do what we can to keep things moving
forward.

 --Jenifer 

--- On Sat, 8/22/09, John W. <jbw292002 at gmail.com> wrote:

From: John W. <jbw292002 at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] When You Comin' Back, Red Ryder?
To: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at illinois.edu>
Cc: "Peace-discuss" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>
Date: Saturday, August 22, 2009, 2:16 AM

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:15 PM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu
<http://us.mc449.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=galliher@illinois.edu> >
wrote:

"... the Counter-Culture hung up the Out of Business sign sometime in the
Nineties, finished off by identity politics and general
self-satisfaction..."

--<http://www.counterpunch.org/>

Commenting weekly in those days on "the news of the week and its coverage by
the media" on News from Neptune as I was, I'd say that Alex Cockburn has
this about right.

I haven't read Cockburn's article; his essays are invariably too long for my
limited attention span.  But I submit that in the so-called
"counter-culture" essentially BECAME the culture.  In some ways our
generation, that of the 60s, was absorbed into the existing culture; in
certain ways it profoundly changed the culture; and in yet other ways the
culture recoiled in horror and moved in the opposite direction.   But isn't
that simply the way of the world?  Thesis ---> antithesis ---> synthesis ,
for good or ill?

What we need now, I guess, is a NEW counter-culture.  The closest thing I've
seen to that in this country is the development of the independent media
movement starting in the late 1990s.  Last I looked, the U-C Independent
Media Center was still very much alive and well.  But of course the new
counter-culture needs to affect more than just the media, important as that
is.

I further submit, though, that as long as human beings populate the planet
and compete for finite resources, there will ALWAYS be war.  I dare to
imagine that American culture could change to allow for universal health
care if the political and public will was there.   We could inject a bit of
"socialism" into our "free-market capitalism" without demonstrable ill
effects.  But human nature does not change, and war will be with us always.

J.W.

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
<http://us.mc449.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Peace-discuss@lists.chambana.n
et> 
http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss

  _____  

_______________________________________________

Peace-discuss mailing list

  Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net

  http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss

_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20090824/ab9afb4a/attachment-0001.htm