[Peace-discuss] Re: Immigration Reform Rally!

[Jenifer Cartwright]

Ahh, so that's the excuse you got in the past! Instead of the old, "Not tonight, dear, I have a headache," it was, "Maybe another time -- right now, my melatonin-progesterone-estrogen levels are off!" 
 
Thanks, Wayne, y're a great straight man :-)
 --Jenifer

--- On Tue, 12/8/09, E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag> wrote:


From: E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag>
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Re: Immigration Reform Rally!
To: "Jenifer Cartwright" <jencart13 at yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 11:07 PM


On 12/8/2009 7:06 PM, Jenifer Cartwright wrote: 





Gee Wayne, I tho't that women -- unlike cats, dogs, etc -- were always receptive to males (depending on the male, of course).
 --JeniferApparently not.  

Cats are strongly seasonal, and dogs have long refractory times lasting several months.  Most animals have some seasonal tendencies and cyclical times of increased interest in males.  

Women also express seasonal and cyclical tendencies that vary across the human population from insignificant changes to very obvious changes.  The strongest likelihood of receptivity to males occurs when melatonin levels are low (such as when there is increasing daylight) and when progesterone levels are low and estrogen levels are high and rising (the time preceding and up to ovulation).  









 

--- On Tue, 12/8/09, E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag> wrote:


From: E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag>
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Re: Immigration Reform Rally!
To: "Karen Medina" <kmedina67 at gmail.com>
Cc: peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 6:54 PM


It really sounded horrible at first but actually pretty good after I 
considered it more.

You must be living in a land where the women are constantly nude and 
don't have cyclic estrogen surges,
so they are always receptive to the male.  I sort of like the women are 
the  property of men part.
How does one reach this never never land?

On 12/8/2009 5:52 PM, Karen Medina wrote:
> Because women are still socially considered property of men, I see the
> connection to the Dred Scott case.
>
> When men become EQUALLY responsible for the pregnancy, and only then,
> can we reconsider the legality of the abortion issue. Until then,
> women are the victims of men's inability to keep their pants zipped.
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
>
>    

_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss





      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20091209/e133cf45/attachment-0001.html