[Discuss] [Peace-discuss] more than a nuisance
unionyes
unionyes at ameritech.net
Wed Feb 11 10:11:44 CST 2009
Yes Indeed !
But white people will also be jailed and / or killed if they become a
serious enough threat to the system.
Also, in response to Wayne's post, once someone is released from jail ( for
whatever they were convicted of ( rightly or wrongly ) violent or
non-violent ( non violent being the vast majority ) where are they suppose
to live if there are such ordinances in place ?
How are they suppose to re enter society and be " good " citizens if they
cannot find a place to live ?
What will happen is that they will more than likely be forced to turn back
to illegal activity ( possibly violence ) in order to survive.
David Johnson
----- Original Message -----
From: <cu at veyafoundation.org>
To: "E. Wayne Johnson" <ewj at pigs.ag>
Cc: "Community Courtwatch" <discuss at communitycourtwatch.org>; "peace
discuss" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Discuss] [Peace-discuss] more than a nuisance
> Okay since we opened this door let's talk about dangerous criminals in
> Champaign County. Until you commit to punishing and prosecuting the
> private sector, city, state and federal government for the 100 years that
> they have robbed and stolen trillions of dollars from everyday people
> then how do you support an ordinance that will be used to discriminate
> against the minority and the poor. If law enforcement was aggressively
> targeting those dangerous criminals like they pursue the poor and
> minority then your argument would be valid. I see and hear only a few. As
> a few of my white friends and colleagues told me if you Patrick go out
> and fight injustice they will lock you up and kill you. But if I a white
> person fight for those same reasons nothing would happen to me.
>
> PDT
>
> Quoting "E. Wayne Johnson" <ewj at pigs.ag>:
>
>> Excuse me, but your posting did focus on upkeep.
>>
>> The City of Urbana has a law forbidding landlords from denying housing
>> to persons because of a criminal record.
>>
>> Do you think this law should be repealed? I am intending this to be a
>> serious question.
>>
>> Certainly not all dangerous criminals have criminal records, vis a vis,
>> the past and current President, many members of Congress,...
>> And not all persons with criminal records are really "dangerous
>> criminals", but there may be some correlation.
>>
>>
>> Ricky Baldwin wrote:
>>> And basic maintenance is not my point, Wayne, but the hazards and
>>> sometimes terror of living in a building or in a neighborhood where
>>> landlords keep renting to dangerous criminals, and so on.
>>> Ricky
>>>
>>> "Speak your mind even if your voice shakes." - Maggie Kuhn
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* E. Wayne Johnson <ewj at pigs.ag>
>>> *To:* Ricky Baldwin <baldwinricky at yahoo.com>
>>> *Cc:* peace discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; Community
>>> Courtwatch <discuss at communitycourtwatch.org>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:13:53 AM
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] more than a nuisance
>>>
>>> Your previous experience and hard work is noted and appreciated by
>>> all, but Basic maintenance is not at all what the proposed urbana
>>> criminal nuisance ordinance is about.
>>>
>>> The most recent draft is available at the city's website.
>>> http://www.city.urbana.il.us/Urbana/City_Council/Agendas/01-12-2009/ordinance_2008-11-135.pdf
>>> Additional info here:
>>> http://www.city.urbana.il.us/Urbana/City_Council/Agendas/02-09-2009/ordinance_2008-11-135.pdf
>>>
>>> Ricky Baldwin wrote:
>>>> My opinion may not be popular on either of these lists, but I think I
>>>> ought to explain where I'm coming from.
>>>>
>>>> In the nineties I worked for ACORN - an association I was never
>>>> prouder of than in this last election. As a lone NYC Council member
>>>> once said in another context - about not so different attacks on poor
>>>> people organizing for their rights to vote, to improve their
>>>> communities, to live in decent housing and safe neighborhoods,
>>>> attacks by people who oppose all those things - "It is a badge of
>>>> honor!"
>>>>
>>>> When I was at ACORN I spent my days and evenings six days a week
>>>> walking around in the poorest, most dangerous (a.k.a. "worst")
>>>> neighborhoods in the cities where I worked, talking to people who
>>>> lived in toxic environments. There were many rats, and in Buffalo
>>>> skunks, garbage in the streets not swept by the city, abandoned
>>>> buildings, vacant lots. When it rained water cascaded down the walls
>>>> of the living rooms and kitchens where we sat and talked and they
>>>> offered me orange juice and tried to figure out why I wasn't married
>>>> and we planned the next meeting and how to get the press interested
>>>> and which local preachers might help and which might get in the way,
>>>> which cops were honest and which were dangerous criminals. Front
>>>> doors of apartment buildings didn't lock or had been broken for
>>>> months. Some people were afraid to go out into the hallways in their
>>>> own building because of the violence and violent people going in and
>>>> out, or living next door, down the hall, just up stairs.
>>>>
>>>> These were hazards, nightmares, not mere "nuisances".
>>>> Landlord after landlord refused to fix anything, get rid of any
>>>> dangerous tenants haunting the buildings, or take any responsibility
>>>> at all. People in these communities were trapped. They lived there
>>>> because they had few options, and there was very little recourse. We
>>>> organized together and fought the landlords, pressured city government
>>>> to hold them accountable, and demanded that the landlords and the
>>>> local government take some responsibility for the neglect and
>>>> toxicity of those neighborhoods. It was always an uphill climb,
>>>> because money and influence and property rights were always on the
>>>> other side. We won some, one piece at a time, but in truth we lost
>>>> more often. I think a lot of us know that song. Even the victories
>>>> were often mixed bags, but we improved real lives.
>>>>
>>>> I do have concerns about the proposed "Nuisance Ordinance" - some
>>>> along the lines I think expressed by Charlie Smyth - and I'd like to
>>>> see a more community-based, even complaint-driven system, rather than
>>>> reliance on the police - but overall I support this effort. I hope
>>>> I've explained why. I continue to support efforts to expose and
>>>> address police racial profiling and other abuses of power. I still
>>>> hope we as a community can strengthen the police review board some
>>>> day soon. But I do not see this ordinance as repressive on its face,
>>>> but potentially very progressive.
>>>>
>>>> In Solidarity,
>>>> Ricky
>>>>
>>>> "Speak your mind even if your voice shakes." - Maggie Kuhn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Peace-discuss mailing list
>>>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>>>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>>>>
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.communitycourtwatch.org
> http://lists.communitycourtwatch.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-communitycourtwatch.org
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.21/1945 -
> Release Date: 2/11/2009 8:01 AM
>
>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list