[Peace-discuss] Blago-Burris circus

Wed Jan 7 11:30:17 CST 2009

True that selling a Senate seat is not much of a crime compared to making aggressive war, particularly against civilians.  However, I don't think it counts for much that our illustrious governor hasn't yet been convicted, as you point out - after all, neither has Bush - or Obama.  (Obama hasn't even been inaugurated yet, after which we *fear* that he *may* "kill thousands" - and while it can be argued that his relative inaction has allowed the deaths of many thousands, and we would have wanted him to fight for the anti-war mantle he at times claimed, that's just not the same as being a "blood-spattered con-man" I think.

It might be more like a politician who doesn't measure up to our expectations - imagine that - but in this case one who may represent an opening to make some gains, at times moderate, at times marginal, with any luck on occasion significant gains, on various fronts, but only if we organize to make it happen.

It is also true that it is hard to "fill the streets" for much of anything.  It's a lot easier to complain that we aren't doing it, I have to say.  But even if we do try and fail to organize mass protests, it's more useful to analyze why specific efforts fail and other succeed than to simply dismiss the efforts of others.  

Personally, I think Just Foreign Policy has some worthy campaigns going on - to try to block any attacks on Iran, for example.  At the moment, MoveOn - though most of us are not usually fans - has a good project to rally Obama supporters to push the most "progressive" agenda possible.  It's a good idea.  Organized labor and other groups are all pushing what they think they can, and many of these efforts seem to me to be worth our support - with some glaring exceptions, like that nonsense I shared earlier about "partitioning Iraq" or whatever.

There are promises that Obama made, like closing Guantanamo Bay, and rhetoric he used, about "diplomacy" for example, that organizers can use to rally for bigger and better causes, expanding on these ideas to call for, e.g. closing *all* bases like Gitmo and the fmr. SOA, etc.  And there are ideas where Obama has been "inactive" - like the Israeli occupation and aggression against the Palestinian people - that need our efforts as well.  This Saturday at noon there is a rally against Isareli aggression in Gaza.  The Mosque had a meeting last night to plan local response to these attacks.  AWARE is planning an event for the local MLK Day activities.  These are all worthy efforts.  And if we still have energy, and feel that more should be done, we can meet together with people and plan more.

But simply to dismiss the lack of effort, paint Obama with a wide brush, or accuse the antiwar movement of being coopted without backing that up, just doesn't help anything, in my opinion.  But now i'm repeating myself. 
Ricky 

"Speak your mind even if your voice shakes." - Maggie Kuhn 

________________________________
From: C. G. Estabrook <galliher at uiuc.edu>
To: Ricky Baldwin <baldwinricky at yahoo.com>
Cc: peace discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 4, 2009 12:02:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Blago-Burris circus

Yes, and, with the happy accident of the BBC (I like your coinage of "Blago-Burris circus"), Illinois continues to supply a distraction from the real political situation, as it did during the presidential (non-)election.

Consider two Illinois politicians. One may be guilty of nothing more than bad language and politics as usual: he's been convicted of nothing, and -- innocent until proven guilty -- has exercised his legal responsibility to appoint a senator. (I should think that Illinoisans would be more miffed at the Senate's intention to disregard our legal procedures.)  He hasn't even been accused of killing anybody, or even planning to.

The other Illinois politician is publicly planning to kill thousands, and by his inaction has allowed the killing of hundreds this week alone by thugs paid by our government.  But we're not planning to fill the streets to prevent the public celebration of the inauguration of this blood-spattered con-man.  Our dismay is displaced onto the pathetic governor.  As he might say, fuck that...

--CGE

Ricky Baldwin wrote:
> Couple of even more annoying developments, from Nick Burbules's excellent
> news roundup ...
> 
> http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/1/3/94832/93890/631/679744
> 
> http://www.mydd.com/story/2009/1/3/19577/93035
> 
> And even the most superficial overview of Burris's past seems to suggest that
> his current level of opportunism is par for the course, e.g.:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_Burris
> 
> Are we really going to have to start the Obama Administration arguing over
> non-issues like, "He's just a sneaky Chicago politician like that Blago and
> Burris..." or "lynching" Burris, or (as someone shouted at last month's demo)
> the claim that Obama is a Muslim [as if that were a problem, but of course he
> isn't, followed by:]  "Oh, yeah?  Then why'd he change his name to a Muslim
> name? [cue the sound of truck engine zooming away]" - or better yet, "Good
> luck with the Magic Negro," or whatever????
> 
> Don't we have enough problems to try to sort out, you know, with depression
> looming and huge tracts of the planet drowning in blood, for example?
> 
> Ricky
> 
> "Speak your mind even if your voice shakes." - Maggie Kuhn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20090107/292ae51f/attachment-0001.htm