[Peace-discuss] Biological imperatives

[Ron Szoke]

More off-topic questions for Wayne:

3.  Since you have cited your authority & expertise as a biologist as support for 
your  opinions on the moral status of homosexuality, do you hold that the great 
majority of biologists hold the same opinion on the same basis?  It seems to me 
that, if there is not a strong consensus among the great majority of qualified 
biologists on the moral question, then your supposed credentials as a biologist 
are of no avail whatever in supporting your moral views.  (Looks like you quote 
the Bible instead.)

Indeed, some biologists take very different views.  For example, Edward O. 
Wilson in _On Human Nature_ (Harvard U.P., 1978), chapter 6, esp. pages 141-
-7 on the prevalence of homosexuality in many species and human cultures.  
Do you consider your biological authority & expertise greater than Wilson's?  

4.  This raises the question of your judgment on the validity of  the 
supernatural creationist account in Genesis 1 & 2.  Do you consider more 
worthy of belief than the Darwinian-Mendelian account of evolution in modern 
biology?  If so, please explain.

-- Ron


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Gay  sex.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 55908 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20090126/be022c6b/Gaysex-0001.jpg