[Peace-discuss] Uri Avery on "racist Democracy"

Morton K. Brussel brussel at illinois.edu
Sat May 30 22:00:35 CDT 2009


I think that Mazin Qumsiyeh earlier used the term. --mkb

“Racists for Democracy”

30/05/09


HOW LUCKY we are to have the extreme Right standing guard over our  
democracy.

This week, the Knesset voted by a large majority (47 to 34) for a law  
that threatens imprisonment for anyone who dares to deny that Israel  
is a Jewish and Democratic State.

The private member’s bill, proposed by MK Zevulun Orlev of the “Jewish  
Home” party, which sailed through its preliminary hearing, promises  
one year in prison to anyone who publishes “a call that negates the  
existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and Democratic State”, if  
the contents of the call might cause “actions of hate, contempt or  
disloyalty against the state or the institutions of government or the  
courts”.

One can foresee the next steps. A million and a half Arab citizens  
cannot be expected to recognize Israel as a Jewish and Democratic  
State. They want it to be “a state of all its citizens” – Jews, Arabs  
and others. They also claim with reason that Israel discriminates  
against them, and therefore is not really democratic. And, in  
addition, there are also Jews who do not want Israel to be defined as  
a Jewish State in which non-Jews have the status, at best, of  
tolerated outsiders.

The consequences are inevitable. The prisons will not be able to hold  
all those convicted of this crime. There will be a need for  
concentration camps all over the country to house all the deniers of  
Israeli democracy.

The police will be unable to deal with so many criminals. It will be  
necessary to set up a new unit. This may be called “Special Security”,  
or, in short, SS.

Hopefully, these measures will suffice to preserve our democracy. If  
not, more stringent steps will have to be taken, such as revoking the  
citizenship of the democracy-deniers and deporting them from the  
country, together with the Jewish leftists and all the other enemies  
of the Jewish democracy.

After the preliminary reading of the bill, it now goes to the Legal  
Committee of the Knesset, which will prepare it for the first, and  
soon thereafter for the second and third readings. Within a few weeks  
or months, it will be the law of the land.

By the way, the bill does not single out Arabs explicitly – even if  
this is its clear intention, and all those who voted for it understood  
this. It also prohibits Jews from advocating a change in the state’s  
definition, or the creation of a bi-national state in all of historic  
Palestine or spreading any other such unconventional ideas. One can  
only imagine what would happen in the US if a senator proposed a law  
to imprison anyone who suggests an amendment to the Constitution of  
the United States of America.

THE BILL does not stand out at all in our new political landscape.

This government has already adopted a bill to imprison for three years  
anyone who mourns the Palestinian Naqba – the 1948 uprooting of more  
than half the Palestinian people from their homes and lands.

The sponsors expect Arab citizens to be happy about that event. True,  
the Palestinians were caused a certain unpleasantness, but that was  
only a by-product of the foundation of our state. The Independence Day  
of the Jewish and Democratic State must fill us all with joy. Anyone  
who does not express this joy should be locked up, and three years may  
not be enough.

This bill has been confirmed by the Ministerial Commission for Legal  
Matters, prior to being submitted to the Knesset. Since the rightist  
government commands a majority in the Knesset, it will be adopted  
almost automatically. (In the meantime, a slight delay has been caused  
by one minister, who appealed the decision, so the Ministerial  
Commission will have to confirm it again.)

The sponsors of the law hope, perhaps, that on Naqba Day the Arabs  
will dance in the streets, plant Israeli flags on the ruins of some  
600 Arab villages that were wiped off the map and offer up their  
thanks to Allah in the mosques for the miraculous good fortune that  
was bestowed on them.

THIS TAKES me back to the 60s, when the weekly magazine I edited,  
Haolam Hazeh, published an Arabic edition. One of its employees was a  
young man called Rashed Hussein from the village of Musmus. Already as  
a youth he was a gifted poet with a promising future.

He told me that some years earlier the military governor of his area  
had summoned him to his office. At the time, all the Arabs in Israel  
were subject to a military government which controlled their lives in  
all matters big and small. Without a permit, an Arab citizen could not  
leave his village or town even for a few hours, nor get a job as a  
teacher, nor acquire a tractor or dig a well.

The governor received Rashed cordially, offered him coffee and paid  
lavish compliments to his poetry. Then he came to the point: in a  
month’s time, Independence Day was due, and the governor was going to  
hold a big reception for the Arab “notables”; he asked Rashed to write  
a special poem for the occasion.

Rashed was a proud youngster, nationalist to the core, and not lacking  
in courage. He explained to the governor that Independence Day was no  
joyful day for him, since his relatives had been driven from their  
homes and most of the Musmus village’s land had also been expropriated.

When Rashed arrived back at his village some hours later, he could not  
help noticing that his neighbors were looking at him in a peculiar  
way. When he entered his home, he was shocked. All the members of his  
family were sitting on the floor, the women lamenting at the top of  
their voices, the children huddling fearfully in a corner. His first  
thought was that somebody had died.

“What have you done to us!” one of the women cried, “What did we do to  
you?”

“You have destroyed the family,” another shouted, “You have finished  
us!”

It appeared that the governor had called the family and told them that  
Rashed had refused to fulfill his duty to the state. The threat was  
clear: from now on, the extended family, one of the largest in the  
village, would be on the black list of the military government. The  
consequences were clear to everyone.

Rashed could not stand up against the lamentation of his family. He  
gave in and wrote the poem, as requested. But something inside him was  
broken. Some years later he emigrated to the US, got a job there at  
the PLO office and died tragically: he was burned alive in his bed  
after going to sleep, it appears, while smoking a cigarette.

THESE DAYS are gone forever. We took part in many stormy  
demonstrations against the military government until it was finally  
abolished in 1966. As a newly elected Member of Parliament, I had the  
privilege of voting for its abolition.

The fearful and subservient Arab minority, then amounting to some 200  
thousand souls, has recovered its self-esteem. A second and third  
generation has grown up, its downtrodden national pride has raised its  
head again, and today they are a large and self-confident community of  
1.5 million. But the attitude of the Jewish Right has not changed for  
the better. On the contrary.

In the Knesset bakery (the Hebrew word for bakery is Mafia) some new  
pastries are being baked. One of them is a bill that stipulates that  
anyone applying for Israeli citizenship must declare their loyalty to  
“the Jewish, Zionist and Democratic State”, and also undertake to  
serve in the army or its civilian alternative. Its sponsor is MK David  
Rotem of the “Israel is Our Home” party, who also happens to be the  
chairman of the Knesset Law Committee.

A declaration of loyalty to the state and its laws – a framework  
designed to safeguard the wellbeing and the rights of its citizens –  
is reasonable. But loyalty to the “Zionist” state? Zionism is an  
ideology, and in a democratic state the ideology can change from time  
to time. It would be like declaring loyalty to a “capitalist” USA, a  
“rightist Italy”, a ”leftist” Spain, a “Catholic Poland” or a  
“nationalist” Russia.

This would not be a problem for the tens of thousands of Orthodox Jews  
in Israel who reject Zionism, since Jews will not be touched by this  
law. They obtain citizenship automatically the moment they arrive in  
Israel.

Another bill waiting for its turn before the Ministerial Committee  
proposes changing the declaration that every new Knesset Member has to  
make before assuming office. Instead of loyalty “to the State of  
Israel and its laws”, as now, he or she will be required to declare  
their loyalty “to the Jewish, Zionist and Democratic State of Israel,  
its symbols and its values”. That would exclude almost automatically  
all the elected Arabs, since declaring loyalty to the “Zionist” state  
would mean that no Arab would ever vote for them again.

It would also be a problem for the Orthodox members of the Knesset,  
who cannot declare loyalty to Zionism. According to Orthodox doctrine,  
the Zionists are depraved sinners and the Zionist flag is unclean. God  
exiled the Jews from this country because of their wickedness, and  
only God can permit them to return. Zionism, by preempting the job of  
the Messiah, has committed an unpardonable sin, and many Orthodox  
Rabbis chose to remain in Europe and be murdered by the Nazis rather  
than committing the Zionist sin of going to Palestine.

THE FACTORY of racist laws with a distinct fascist odor is now working  
at full steam. That is built into the new coalition.

At its center is the Likud party, a good part of which is pure racist  
(sorry for the oxymoron). To its right there is the ultra-racist Shas  
party, to the right of which is Lieberman’s ultra-ultra racist “Israel  
is our Home” party, the ultra-ultra-ultra racist “Jewish Home” party,  
and to its right the even more racist “National Union” party, which  
includes outright Kahanists and stands with one foot in the coalition  
and the other on the moon.

All these factions are trying to outdo each other. When one proposes a  
crazy bill, the next is compelled to propose an even crazier one, and  
so on.

All this is possible because Israel has no constitution. The ability  
of the Supreme Court to annul laws that contradict the “basic laws” is  
not anchored anywhere, and the Rightist parties are trying to abolish  
it. Not for nothing did Avigdor Lieberman demand – and get – the  
Justice and Police ministries.

Just now, when the governments of the US and Israel are clearly on a  
collision course over the settlements, this racist fever may infect  
all parts of the coalition.

If one goes to sleep with a dog, one should not be surprised to wake  
up with fleas (may the dogs among my readers pardon me). Those who  
elected such a government, and even more so those who joined it,  
should not be surprised by its laws, which ostensibly safeguard Jewish  
democracy.

The most appropriate name for these holy warriors would be “Racists  
for Democracy”.

Uri Avnery's Column

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20090530/62fa9a57/attachment.html


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list