[Peace-discuss] State Department Terminates Aid to Honduras Coup Regime

[E. Wayne Johnson]

Whether or not Honduras has an impeachment provision
seems to be a matter of semiotics.  It appears that the
Congress decided to remove Zelaya and the Supreme Court ordered him removed,
the "equivalent" to impeachment and removal.

> Congress voted to
> remove him for what it called "repeated violations of the constitution and
> the law", and the Supreme Court said it had ordered the president to be
> removed from office to protect law and order.
Here's the link to the BBC page:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8124154.stm


Honduras apparently has a provision for action under duress, so the coup 
is not exactly "illegal".
> Article 24 of Honduras' penal code will exonerate the joint chiefs of 
> staff who made the decision,
> because it allows for making tough decisions based on the good of the 
> state, Inestroza said.
But, My Original question was "Why are we meddling with the affairs of 
Honduras, a sovereign state?"

Should China impose monetary policy sanctions on the US because Mr. 
Obama has proposed illegal detention of
dissidents, or because Obama has continued Bush's unconstitutional 
activities, or because the US is in the process
of escalating its occupation of Afghanistan?  Jimmy Carter told us that 
the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan was so
immoral that Amerikans ought to starve the Soviets into submission.  
Carter instituted a grain embargo that
devastated the American Farmer.  How can we be on the moral high ground 
in Afghanistan while the Soviets
were scoundrels for doing nothing worse than what we are doing?

Isn't the most appropriate response of the US a cessation of military 
activity in the region and a non-interventionist foreign policy?



On 9/4/2009 8:22 AM, Robert Naiman wrote:
> The Honduran Congress never "impeached" President Zelaya. There is no
> impeachment provision in the Honduran Constitution.
>
> The top legal adviser to the Honduran military admitted that the
> Honduran military broke the law:
>
> http://www.miamiherald.com/1506/story/1125872.html
>
> Do you have a link to that BBC story?
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:49 AM, E. Wayne Johnson<ewj at pigs.ag>  wrote:
>    
>> The BBC reports:
>>
>> Tension had been brewing in Honduras over recent months. Mr Zelaya sacked
>> the head of the armed forces, who refused to give logistical support for the
>> 28 June vote. The Supreme Court overruled him, saying the army chief should
>> be reinstated.
>>
>> When Mr Zelaya insisted the consultation would go ahead,
>>
>> Since Honduras's own Congress has IMPEACHED and voted to Remove Zelaya, and
>> the
>> Honduras's own Supreme Court has ordered Zelaya's removal, How is it that
>> Anyone could
>> say that his removal is Illegal, since it would appear that Due Process and
>> the Rule of Law is
>> being followed?
>>
>> On 9/4/2009 7:36 AM, E. Wayne Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Of course I am pleased that the US is terminating its "aid" to Honduras.
>> Honduras
>> should be glad too.  Amerika's jelly beans have fishhooks in them.
>>
>> What business does the United States have interfering with the conduct of
>> government in Honduras,
>> a sovereign state?
>>
>> The American battle for independence from the bloody British was an illegal
>> coup.
>> We have a military base in Honduras.
>> Why shouldn't they throw us out of there if they could?
>>
>> How is our meddling with Honduras not an act of aggression against a weak
>> sovereign nation?
>> How is it any different from what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan?
>>
>> It appears that the initiating spark in Honduras is an insistance on
>> violation of term limits by the now-ousted President.
>> What is it that we like about that?
>>
>> Is the US on the wrong side of the fight?  (once again?)
>>
>>
>> On 9/4/2009 7:04 AM, Robert Naiman wrote:
>>
>> I think Jenifer meant to say, "stopped short of calling it a military coup."
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:23 AM, John W.<jbw292002 at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Jenifer Cartwright<jencart13 at yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Stopped short of calling it a coup, but better than hoped for, huh?
>>   --Jenifer
>>
>>
>> Huh?????
>>
>>
>> U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
>> Office of the Spokesman
>>
>> For Immediate Release
>>
>> September 3, 2009
>> 2009/869
>>
>>
>> STATEMENT BY IAN KELLY
>>
>> Termination of Assistance and Other Measures Affecting the De Facto
>> Regime in Honduras
>>
>> The Department of State announces the termination of a broad range of
>> assistance to the government of Honduras as a result of the coup
>> d’etat that took place on June 28.  The Secretary already had
>> suspended assistance shortly after the coup.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Peace-discuss mailing list
>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> Peace-discuss mailing list
>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Peace-discuss mailing list
>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>>
>>
>>      
>
>
>
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/archive/peace-discuss/attachments/20090904/60919cb2/attachment-0001.htm