[Peace-discuss] NYT "Mystery" Op-ed Calls for More Afghan Civilian Deaths

Robert Naiman naiman.uiuc at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 13:26:27 CST 2010


In my experience - others who have a different experience, feel free
to share - in order to motivate action, one must focus on the
particulars of the case. A paramount goal in writing this piece was to
motivate people to write the New York Times Public Editor to urge that
he investigate this particular case. I doubt that if my theme was,
"this is exactly the same behavior that the New York Times always
demonstrates, and always will demonstrate, from now until the end of
time," it would impel people anyone to take action...

By the way:
[You can urge the NYT Public Editor to investigate here:
public at nytimes.com]

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:58 AM, C. G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu> wrote:
> I don't understand the surprise. Bill Keller, executive editor of the Times,
> is a DLC Democrat who has always supported the Long War & US policy in the
> Middle East (like Obama & Co.).  The question has always been, is it being
> pursued effectively?  That's just the issue being taken up in this op-ed.
>  --CGE
>
>
> Robert Naiman wrote:
>>
>> [You can urge the NYT Public Editor to investigate here:
>> public at nytimes.com]
>>
>> On Thursday the New York Times made an astonishing editorial choice,
>> for which its editors owe the public an explanation: it published an
>> op-ed by an obscure and poorly identified author attacking General
>> Stanley McChrystal for his directive last July that air strikes in
>> Afghanistan be authorized only under "very limited and prescribed
>> conditions." The op-ed denounced an "overemphasis on civilian
>> protection" and charged that "air support to American and Afghan
>> forces has been all but grounded by concerns about civilian
>> casualties."
>>
>> The author of the op-ed, Lara M. Dadkhah, is identified by the Times
>> merely as "an intelligence analyst." In the body of the op-ed, the
>> author identifies herself as "employed by a defense consulting
>> company," without telling us which company, or what her relationship
>> might be to actors who stand to lose financially if the recognition
>> that killing civilians is bad for the United States were to affect
>> expenditures by the United States military.
>>
>> As Glenn Greenwald asks in Salon:
>>
>> What defense consulting company employs her? Do they have any ties to
>> the war effort? Do they benefit from the grotesque policies she's
>> advocating? What type of "analyst" is she? Who knows... it's virtually
>> impossible to find any information about "Lara Dadkhah" using standard
>> Internet tools.
>>
>>
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/nyt-mystery-op-ed-calls-f_b_468999.html
>>
>> http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/2/19/121312/180
>>
>> http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/488
>>
>> --
>> Robert Naiman
>> Just Foreign Policy
>> www.justforeignpolicy.org
>> naiman at justforeignpolicy.org
>>
>> Change.org: End the war in Afghanistan
>> Timeline for Withdrawal and Political Negotiations
>>
>> http://www.change.org/ideas/view/end_the_war_in_afghanistan_establish_a_timeline_for_withdrawal_and_begin_political_negotiations
>>
>



-- 
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
naiman at justforeignpolicy.org

Change.org: End the war in Afghanistan
Timeline for Withdrawal and Political Negotiations
http://www.change.org/ideas/view/end_the_war_in_afghanistan_establish_a_timeline_for_withdrawal_and_begin_political_negotiations

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list