[Peace-discuss] Common opinions - basis for a new politics?
E.Wayne Johnson
ewj at pigs.ag
Sat Jan 2 12:47:57 CST 2010
I liked this article and agree fully with items 2-7, 9 and 10.
I was in China during the election of 2000, and would have stayed there
for sure if Gore had won. It was one of my contingency points. I hated
Clinton's Imperialism and GWBush's humble foreign policy sounded good to me.
I didnt like the elder Bush but then thought that the younger Bush would
not
be a continuation of Clintonian Wars abroad. So much for that.
On item 2 I am presently fully convinced that not only did the US government
know about the 9/11
attack, but there was massive collusion and orchestration which included the
detonation of explosive and
incendiary devices to effect the catastrophic demolition of the buildings.
I have rather slowly come to this conclusion.
Explanations other than "9/11 was an Inside Job" might be crazy conspiracy
theories.
Regarding item 8, there has not been a free market in the US for a long
time. I agree that Americans are deranged when not simply asleep. Most
Americans seem to be weak Zombies. Alice says that weak Zombies fall down.
That seems descriptive enough.
----- Original Message -----
From: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at illinois.edu>
To: "Peace-discuss" <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 9:05 AM
Subject: [Peace-discuss] Common opinions - basis for a new politics?
> Published on Friday, January 1, 2010 by CommonDreams.org
> The Real Top Ten Stories of the Past Decade
> by Robert Freeman
>
> The media are awash with talking heads bloviating about the top stories of
> the last decade. The wired-in society. The growth of organic food. The
> new frugality. This is the ritual that reveals their true function in the
> culture: pacification. It's their way of signaling the masses that Bigger
> Thinkers are looking after things, so go back to your Wii or Survivor or
> Facebook reveries.
>
> The amazing thing is how little is ever mentioned about the stories that
> really mattered, those that affected the very nature of our society, its
> institutions, and the relation of the people to their state and society.
>
> Those stories paint a picture of danger, of a people who have lost control
> of their government and the corporations that own it. But you'll hear
> nary a word about such difficult truths from any storyteller in the
> conventional media.
>
> So here, in no particular order, are my Top Ten Stories of the Naughties,
> the ones that really matter.
>
> [1] The Supreme Court hijacking the 2000 presidential election. This
> isn't even a historical controversy anymore. Al Gore won the national
> popular vote by 570,000. And we now know he would have won the Florida
> vote as well if the vote counting had not been stopped by the Supreme
> Court. This was literally a right wing judicial coup d' etat, so it's
> understandable that it's never mentioned in the "right" kind of circles.
>
> [2] Bush knew of 9/11 long before it actually happened. Three years
> before Bush took office, the neo-cons' Project For a New American Century
> called for a "new Pearl Harbor" to galvanize the nation into a war to
> seize Middle East oil. And even before the event itself,
> Bush-as-president was warned dozens of times of the imminent attack, the
> most notorious being the August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing
> titled, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S". Amazingly nothing was
> done to prevent the attack. But even less is it advertised that Bush
> knew.
>
> [3] Iraq was all premised on lies, yet we're still there. Saddam Hussein
> wasn't pursuing Weapons of Mass Destruction. He wasn't involved in 9/11.
> He wasn't engaged with Al Qaeda. As with the 2000 election hijacking, we
> know all these things. And we know they were false at the time they were
> proffered. Yet, there we are, with no intent to leave, our very presence
> spitting in the face of International Law and the international community
> we so unctuously pretend to respect.
>
> [4] The Global War on Terror. Or more specifically, the ease with which
> the "GWOT" has replaced the Cold War as the justification for the
> ever-increasing militarization of society. What happened to the post-Cold
> War "Peace Dividend"? The U.S continues to spend more on the military than
> all the rest of the world combined. It continues to maintain over 700
> military bases around the world. And it continues to manufacture excuses
> for foreign interventions whenever weapons makers and military logistics
> companies need more profits — which is forever.
>
> [5] The fact that 2/3 of all economic growth went to top 1%. John
> Kennedy's social contract had a rising tide lifting all boats. But over
> the last decade 2/3 of all economic growth has gone to the top 1% of
> income earners. Meanwhile the middle class has suffered a $13 trillion
> writedown in wealth as a result of the housing collapse. The banking
> bailout and the health care "reform" debate showed as never before the
> extent to which corporations have captured government and use it to
> redirect national wealth to themselves and their owners.
>
> [6] The Neo-Feudalization of the American economy. The top 1% of wealth
> holders own 41% of all the assets in the country while the bottom 40% own
> absolutely nothing. Meanwhile, workers are saddled with $12 trillion of
> national debt, an effective indentured servitude that will bind them to
> their corporate masters for the rest of their lives. This is the working
> definition of feudalism, where the rich own everything and everybody else
> has nothing but their proffered labor and their obligations to their
> masters. The Hapsburgs, the Tudors, and the Bourbons would be jealous.
>
> [7] The surrender of civil liberties. Despite the Fourth Amendment
> supposedly protecting us against unreasonable searches and seizures, the
> government can now read your email and listen to your phone calls without
> any probable cause. The Obama administration has gone to court to prevent
> the re-institution of Habeas Corpus, suspended during the Bush
> administration. We are much less free, much less protected from
> brutalization by our own government than we were just ten years ago.
>
> [8] The failure of "the free market" to sustain prosperity. The "free
> market" has long been an ideological dodge used to resist real government
> regulation of the economy. Still, the ideal was supposed to deliver
> prosperity in a stable, sustainable matter. Now we have the greatest
> global economic collapse since the Great Depression, with the government
> transferring $11 trillion to the banks to cover their sociopathically
> greedy bets that went bust. All in the name of deregulation, with future
> regulation vigorously resisted. Is this a deranged country or what?
>
> [9] The collapse of the media. We once imagined it would guard the hen
> house. Yet that was an anomaly, a freak event around Vietnam and Watergate
> when it slipped its leash. Since then, sixty independent media outlets
> have consolidated into five, all retailing the ideology of the powerful,
> the perpetrators, laundering their lies, covering up the truth, and
> harassing the truth tellers. In every story mentioned above, the
> mainstream media have worked to ensure that the people didn't know the
> truth about the forfeiture of their government, their wealth, their
> security, and their rights.
>
> [10] The meaninglessness of elections. This is the most embittering
> revelation of all. Despite the greatest electoral majority since Johnson
> crushed Goldwater in '64, Barrack Obama has betrayed everything he ran on.
> In every case where he had the opportunity to confront power — in
> financial bailouts, financial regulation, health care, wars and military
> spending, utilities and global warming, national surveillance — Obama has
> sided with the rich and powerful against the interests of the American
> people. He has probably engendered more cynicism, more disaffection with
> government than any president since Richard Nixon. It will deal a
> staggering blow to the hopes of mobilizing masses of people again for a
> real takeback of government. And he's not even one year into it.
>
> History paints decades with broad brushes-the Roaring Twenties, The
> Depression, World War II. Historians will look back on the Naughts as the
> time when Americans Lost Their Country. It was the decade when all the
> institutions that they believed would protect them — the media, the
> courts, Congress, the market, a messianic new president — in fact betrayed
> them. It will forever more be a different country.
>
> But not just yet. Did I tell you about the big move to locally-grown
> produce?
>
> [Robert Freeman writes on history, economics, and education. Email to:
> robertfreeman10 at yahoo.com.]
>
> Comment
>
> SeriousCitizen January 2nd, 2010 9:33 am:
>
> This essay has a dramatic US-centric perspective. This essay essentially
> says that we Americans have been too lazy or too stupid to control our own
> institutions, and therefore we feel "betrayed" and are victims. The top
> ten stories of the decade should include things like:
>
> 1) We Americans killed one million Iraqis for no real reason and made four
> million into refugees.
>
> 2) We Americans bombed and invaded Afghanistan because we refused to
> accept the Taliban government's offers to extradite Osama bin Laden.
>
> 3) We Americans refused to curb our carbon consumption in accord with the
> world community's agreement in the Kyoto Accord, and now millions of poor
> people in other parts of the planet will starve or will find their
> communities going underwater.
>
> 4) We Americans made junk mortgage bonds, gave them AAA+ ratings, and sold
> them all over the world.
>
> 5) We Americans gave Israel the money and illegal weapons (like white
> phosphorus and tungsten bombs) to wage war against an impoverished and
> trapped population in Gaza, most of whom are children under age 15.
>
> 6) We Americans violated the Geneva Conventions on treatment of prisoners
> because we had scared ourselves with our own propaganda.
>
> 7) We Americans allowed our own cities to be attacked on Sept. 11 ... in
> order to scare ourselves into waging war on the world and destroying our
> own freedoms. This kind of list can go on and on. If we Americans do not
> somehow control our own institutions and make them be lawful, honest, and
> just, then we hurt and kill millions of people. We are not the victims of
> our institutions' failings, we are the cause of our institutions'
> failings.
>
> http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/01-0
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/cgi-bin/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list