[Peace-discuss] Re: [sf-core] Fw: don't be afraid

[unionyes]

" Worse, this listing of "conspiracies," even if they can be brought 
together
under that heading, implies nothing about the circumstances of either 9/11 
or
the lap bomber. "

That's true Carl,

Some of it was dubious, but a lot of it was factual events.
Which as you state, some of these may not be considered to some as 
conspiracies.
Which in my opinion is a matter of semantics.

What do you consider a conspiracy ?

David J.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at illinois.edu>
To: "unionyes" <unionyes at ameritech.net>
Cc: <Undisclosed-Recipient:>; <@smtp119.sbc.mail.re3.yahoo.com>; "Socialist 
Forum" <sf-core at yahoogroups.com>; "Peace-discuss" 
<peace-discuss at anti-war.net>
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [sf-core] Fw: don't be afraid


> The piece from "New World Order Report" contains some interesting material 
> that a real democratic political discussion in this country would 
> consider - rather than momentous issues like whether Obama is smart and 
> Bush stupid.
>
> But as it stands the piece is at least a bit credulous - e.g., it's not 
> the case that "The Rothschild dynasty owns roughly half of the world’s 
> wealth," and the "Secret Team" stuff has been been pretty well exploded; 
> also, I had the pleasure of listening as a callow youth to J. K. 
> Galbraith's account of his experience in the Kennedy administration, and I 
> don't doubt his view that "The Report from Iron Mountain" is a hoax, in 
> the sense of a cautionary tale.
>
> Worse, this listing of "conspiracies," even if they can be brought 
> together under that heading, implies nothing about the circumstances of 
> either 9/11 or the lap bomber.
>
> But it may help us to examine institutions and their behavior, notably the 
> USG and the American corporate structure.  --CGE
>
>
> unionyes wrote:
>>  *Since were on the topic of conspiracies, check out the link below that 
>> a friend of mine just sent me ;*
>> *" 33 Conspiracy Theories that turned out to be true "*
>> ** *I don't agree with all of them as being " conspiracy theories " but 
>> still an interesting read.*
>> ** *David J.*
>> ** ** ----- Original Message -----
>>  *Sent:* Monday, January 04, 2010 5:28 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: don't be afraid
>>
>> http://www.newworldorderreport.com/Articles/tabid/266/ID/980/33-Conspiracy-Theories-That-Turned-Out-To-Be-True-What-Every-Person-Should-Know.aspx
>