[Peace-discuss] Fw: [socialistdiscussion] Capitalism against socialism in the view of a washington post writer

[unionyes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: SonjaEngelhardt1 at aol.com 
To: socialistdiscussion at yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 8:47 PM
Subject: [socialistdiscussion] Capitalism against socialism in the view of a washington post writer


  

Hi comrades:
This article is of course not really dealing with socialism and/or capitalism, but it's still quite interesting that reporters bring these issues up in regards to the oil spill crisis. So here is the article:

Gulf oil spill offers a lesson in capitalism vs. socialism 


A sign marks the closed beach on Elmer's Island in Grand Isle, La. (Gerald Herbert/associated Press)

     
     

By E.J. Dionne Jr.


Thursday, May 27, 2010


So who is in charge of stopping the oil spill, BP or the federal government? 



The fact that the answer to this question seems as murky as the water around the exploded oil platform in the Gulf of Mexico suggests that this is an excellent moment to recognize that our arguments pitting capitalism against socialism and the government against the private sector muddle far more than they clarify. 



Many tragic ironies are bubbling to the surface along with the oil. Consider the situation of Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, a Republican conservative who devoutly opposes the exertions of big government. 



"The strength of America is not found in our government," Jindal declared in his response to President Obama's February 2009 address to Congress. "It is found in the compassionate hearts and the enterprising spirit of our citizens." 



But with his state facing an environmental disaster of unknown proportions, Jindal is looking for a little strength from Washington. His beef is that the federal government isn't doing enough to help. "It is clear we don't have the resources we need to protect our coast," he said this week, expressing his frustrations with "the disjointed effort to date that has too often meant too little, too late." 



You can't blame Jindal for being mad. But will he ever acknowledge that "compassionate hearts" were not sufficient for coping with this catastrophe? Did he ever ask BP how prepared it was for something like this? Or was he just counting on the company's "enterprising spirit"? 
For its part, the Obama administration has not sent a consistent message. On Sunday, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar proclaimed outside of BP's headquarters in Houston: "If we find they're not doing what they're supposed to be doing, we'll push them out of the way appropriately." 





Not according to Adm. Thad Allen, the national incident commander. Speaking the next day at the White House, Allen observed: "To push BP out of the way, it would raise a question: Replace them with what?" 



Exactly. While Allen may not be a political philosopher, he spoke with the sophistication of one during an interview with CNN. 
"What makes this an unprecedented anomalous event," he said, "is access to the discharge site is controlled by the technology that was used for the drilling, which is owned by the private sector." 



So there you have it: "Do something!" citizens shout to a government charged with protecting the environment in and around a Gulf of Mexico that is nobody's private property. Yet the government, it seems, can't do much of anything because the means of stopping the flow of oil are entirely in the hands of a private company. BP was trusted to know what it was doing with complicated equipment that, it would appear, it either didn't understand very well or was willing to use recklessly. 



Belatedly, the Obama administration has realized that citizens can never accept the idea that their government is powerless. It is moving to show that it's in charge, even when it is not. The president plans to visit the gulf again, on Friday, and on Wednesday, the White House called in a group of journalists for a briefing with Allen, who is earning a reputation for bluff candor. He spoke as the order was given to try to plug the well through a process colorfully called "top kill." 



Allen was direct in saying that the law clearly places the responsibility for ending this spill with BP. He added that it was "a legitimate line of inquiry" as to whether this is where the power should be lodged. "Are these public goods or private goods?" he asked. "Who should produce them? This is an absolutely legitimate question." It's too bad this legitimate question wasn't asked a long time ago. 



Allen rightly urged that Congress's decision to place so much authority with private companies be reviewed by the commission investigating the spill. And there will surely be an inquest into how such a potentially dangerous technology got by with so little regulatory oversight. Before we drill offshore again, we should pause, baby, pause. 



"Deregulation" is wonderful until we discover what happens when regulations aren't issued or enforced. Everyone is a capitalist until a private company blunders. Then everyone starts talking like a socialist, presuming that the government can put things right because they see it as being just as big and powerful as its Tea Party critics claim it is. 



But the truth is that we have disempowered government and handed vast responsibilities over to a private sector that will never see protecting the public interest as its primary task. The sludge in the gulf is, finally, the product of our own contradictions. 
ejdionne at washpost.com 

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic 
Messages in this topic (1) 
Recent Activity: 
Visit Your Group 
MARKETPLACE
Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

  Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest . Unsubscribe . Terms of Use.
 
__,_._,___
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20100603/fdf128ad/attachment-0001.html>