[Peace-discuss] Why are we in Afghanistan?
C. G. Estabrook
galliher at illinois.edu
Wed Jun 23 22:41:06 CDT 2010
[In the wake of Obama's announcement today (viz., that he is sending a
pinch-assassin into AfPak), I sent the following letter to the editor of our
local daily. --CGE]
To the editor of the News-Gazette:
Why are we in Afghanistan? Why are American soldiers killing men, women, and
children half-way around the world - and dying and being maimed in the process?
Obama is conducting an even more brutal war than Bush did, but he explains why
only with Bushisms: "I want the American people to understand that we have a
clear and focused goal - to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda in Pakistan
and Afghanistan, and to prevent their return to either country in the future.
That’s the goal that must be achieved.”
Obama is lying, for two reasons:
[1] he must say that he is fighting terrorism because the only constitutional
authority he has to conduct foreign war is the "Authorization for the Use of
Military Force" against terrorists, passed by Congress immediately after 9/11; and
[2] he cannot admit the real reason for this seemingly senseless war: the
control of Mideast energy resources. From Palestine to Pakistan and from Central
Asia to the Horn of Africa, within a 1500-mile radius of the Persian Gulf lie
most of the world's gas and oil. For generations the US has insisted on
controlling it, not for our own use (we import very little oil from the Mideast)
but because of the advantage it gives us over our economic rivals in Europe and
Asia.
The US needs war. If peace should break out, the US would have no excuse for
its military control of the largest oil-producing region of the world.
Sincerely,
C. G. Estabrook
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list