[Peace-discuss] [Discuss] [CentralILJwJ] Fw: Fw: What hath got rot?

Fri Mar 26 11:00:08 CDT 2010

I appreciate the information and elucidation on all fronts. I think what needs to be said, in the final analysis, is that the Democrats who supported a meaningful public option could have had it, if they had been willing to demand it and insist on it as a condition of their support. They didn't do it, they wouldn't do it, and from that we need to learn some important things about the so-called two-party system, if we already haven't.

DG

________________________________
From: Jenifer Cartwright <jencart13 at yahoo.com>
To: unionyes <unionyes at ameritech.net>; Claudia Lennhoff <claudia at shout.net>
Cc: JWJ C-U <centralILJwJ at yahoogroups.com>; sf-core <sf-core at yahoogroups.com>; william gorrell <laborhour at yahoo.com>; Jim Eyman <banjogramps at yahoo.com>; Tristan geo/iww B <tristan.bunner at gmail.com>; C-U Citzens for Peace and Justice <discuss at lists.communitycourtwatch.org>; Damien Mathew <dmathew at mailaps.org>; Dan Elgin ( 2nd e-mail ) <danelgin at gmail.com>; Peace-discuss List <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; Bill Gorrell <laborer at mchsi.com>
Sent: Fri, March 26, 2010 10:36:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Discuss] [Peace-discuss] [CentralILJwJ] Fw: Fw: What hath got rot?

Wow, Claudia, this was AWESOME!! Thanks for taking the time to enlighten us further!! Thanks also for yr very kind offer to personally help those who may be eligible for better healthcare coverage and don't know it yet. I'll echo what others have already said: we're so grateful for you and everyone else connected w/ CCHCC, and for all the wonderful things that CCHCC has done for our community and its residents over the decades.  
A friend died recently after a long and dreadful illness. Fortunately, he was a WWll vet and had excellent care and insurance, or it would have bankrupted his family. The family asked that, in lieu of flowers, memorial contributions be made to a local charity, and I will be sending CCHCC a check in his name. 

 --Jenifer

--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Claudia Lennhoff <claudia at shout.net> wrote:

>From: Claudia Lennhoff <claudia at shout.net>
>Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] [CentralILJwJ] Fw: [Discuss] Fw: What hath got rot?
>To: "unionyes" <unionyes at ameritech.net>
>Cc: "JWJ C-U" <centralILJwJ at yahoogroups.com>, "Dave Powers" <pengdust at aol.com>, "Neil Parthun" <lennybrucefan at gmail.com>, "sf-core" <sf-core at yahoogroups.com>, "william gorrell" <laborhour at yahoo.com>, "Jim Eyman" <banjogramps at yahoo.com>, "Tristan geo/iww B" <tristan.bunner at gmail.com>, "C-U Citzens for Peace and Justice" <discuss at lists.communitycourtwatch.org>, "Damien Mathew" <dmathew at mailaps.org>, "Dan Elgin ( 2nd e-mail )" <danelgin at gmail.com>, "Peace-discuss List" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>, "Bill Gorrell" <laborer at mchsi.com>
>Date: Friday, March 26, 2010, 12:59 AM
>
>
>This is a pretty disappointing and unhelpful turn of the discussion.
>
>If someone wants to know whether and how they will benefit from this plan, you can e-mail me -- I'll ask you some questions, and then get back to you with some information.
>
>"The working poor will not benefit from this bill." Really? Explain to me how the working poor will not benefit.
>
>Is it because you have the idea that "those of us who make around $1000/month will NEVER, EVER be able to afford the $200-300/month minimum premiums?" Where is it that you have read that if you have a $12,000 a year income, you will have to purchase health insurance with a premium of up to $300/mo.? This is simply not true under the health reform law.
>
>Here are some facts about the new health reform law (this doesn't include what is in the budget reconciliation bill, since that has not yet passed) (oh yeah, and this information does NOT come from the corporate media or the Democratic party -- those are not CCHCC's go-to sources):
>
>Medicaid is being expanded tremendously, AND the assets test is being done away with (so, having burial insurance will no longer push you over the limit financially and prevent you from qualifying for Medicaid), as well as the requirement that Medicaid only be available to adults who have minor children (many states have this requirement).
>
>So, this means that, under the new law (the budget reconciliation act will expand it further), single or married adults, working or non-working, parents or non-parents, who have incomes up to 133% of the federal poverty level ($14,412 annual for an individual; $24,360 annual for a family of 3) will be eligible for Medicaid health insurance, and will have NO premiums.
>
>You think this won't help the working poor? Consider the working poor of Missouri. Current Medicaid eligibility in Missouri is dismal.
>
>A working parent in Missouri *may* qualify for Medicaid if their income is at 42% of the federal poverty level or below. That is an income of about $4,500. That's right -- $4,500 annual income. You must earn BELOW that, to qualify for Medicaid.
>
>Now take a non-working parent in Missouri. They *may* qualify for Medicaid in Missouri if their income is at 22% federal poverty level or below. That is an annual income of under $2,400.
>
>There are states with even worse Medicaid eligibility criteria than Missouri -- imagine having to have an income lower than $3,000 annually in order to qualify for Medicaid. And now it will go up to at least $14,412.
>
>Medicaid is a public option health insurance requiring no premium, and typically no co-pays (co-pays may be between $1 - $3).
>
>A huge proportion of the people who may not qualify for Medicaid but will instead get private insurance through the health exchange will qualify for subsidies to help make that insurance more affordable.
>
>For example, an individual making $24,000 who has to buy private health insurance will be asked to pay 31% of the health insurance premium, up to $1,693 annually. An individual making $19,000 will be asked to pay 18% of the premium, up to $982 a year.
>
>There will be no co-pays or co-insurance for preventive care visits -- so mammograms, annual exams, colonoscopies, etc. will not cost anything out of pocket. There will be caps on out-of-pocket expenses so if someone requires a lot of care and has to pay co-pays or co-insurance, they will have financial protection from having huge medical debt.
>
>People want to talk about the cost of paying for health insurance as being prohibitive, but fail to ever talk about the fact that having no insurance is cost-prohibitive in a very real way.
>
>Uninsured people delay, forego, and are refused care when they need it. A price is paid for that. Maybe it's in the form of higher cost for care when care is finally sought. It's certainly in the form of suffering and being ill longer, and perhaps dying prematurely. And it may also take the form of lost wages from work missed. Those are real costs being paid now all the time.
>
>No one has said that this is a "great" health plan -- so to characterize people's positions that way is divisive and disingenuous.
>
>It is also inaccurate and intentionally divisive, it seems to me, to suggest that those who currently have health insurance support this health reform law and do not support single payer, while those who are uninsured support single payer and not this health reform. I work with thousands of individuals from our community and this is just not the case.
>
>Also, I might note that many of the people on these listservs who support this health reform (not because it's "great" or "perfect" but because it will help people and it is better than nothing) are, and have been actively involved in working for single payer.
>
>CCHCC held a couple of single payer events last year. I remember all the people who participated and lent their support (thank you!). There will be more to come on single payer and people will have plenty of opportunity to do real work for single payer.
>
>But the single payer movement is NOT helped by half-truths or falsehoods about the current health reform law. It is perfectly fine and good to critique the current health reform law, but it is really disingenuous and dangerous to say that it will not help people. That's simply not true.
>
>The single payer movement will require people to be informed, and be willing to educate, and not attack others with whom they do not agree completely.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Claudia Lennhoff, CCHCC Executive Director
>
>
>
>
>On 3/25/10 6:59 PM, unionyes wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> To Jenifer and the rest of you that think the Obama so called " health
>> care reform bill " is so great and that any of us who criticize it don't
>> care about their fellow human beings.
>> First of all, I want to ask Jenifer if she has health insurance and if
>> so what type ?
>> Secondly, this posting by Dave P. sums up my feelings perfectly.
>> WE, the working poor, Myself included, are the ones who will NOT benefit
>> from this Bill.
>> Easy for many of the rest of you to say it is so great when you already
>> have health insurance and won't have to face the prospect of a fine and
>> still have no health care.
>> As Dave P. states below, Single Payer IS the ONLY REAL public option.
>> Again, most of you who support the Obama plan, already have health
>> insurance and / or you are relying on info provided to you via the
>> corporate media and the democratic party.
>> Who along with the repubs prevented for day one ANY discussion about
>> single payer.
>> David J.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* pengdust at aol.com <mailto:pengdust at aol.com>
>> *To:* ls1000 at live.com <mailto:ls1000 at live.com> ; jbw292002 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:jbw292002 at gmail.com> ; galliher at illinois.edu
>> <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>
>> *Cc:* Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>> <mailto:Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> ;
>> discuss at lists.communitycourtwatch.org
>> <mailto:discuss at lists.communitycourtwatch.org>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:54 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [Discuss] [Peace-discuss] Fw: What hath got rot?
>> 
>> As an anarchist and a "precarious-shit-worker" who does do the
>> 'grub-work,' I take offense to this "individualistic libertarian
>> anarchists" claim. We, anarcho-PSWs, do not have cushy university jobs
>> with health-care, sick days, vacations, living wages... or the time,
>> privelege, and luxury for academic debates. It is true, those of us who
>> make around $1000/month will NEVER, EVER be able to afford the
>> $200-300/month minimum premiums to fucking corporations after paying
>> some $400 in rent alone! [Add $200-300/loans in student loans, $150 in
>> other bills, etc... and there's nothing left for food. Keeps me in my
>> boyish figure I guess /;-)/ ] Simply, everyday life is always a losing
>> battle... we're working-poor and we're FUCKED, this is real. And, the
>> $700 penalty on top of taxes will only make things worse! Now, for those
>> who make some $40,000/yr this all may be doable, and an improvement, but
>> for many of us who don't it's completely impossible unless the feds pay
>> %100 of our premiums.... i.e., SINGLE-PAYER. So, single-payer is the
>> ONLY improvement for us, and the ONLY solution that was never on the
>> table! [thanks to Both Dems and Reps]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner*, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Peace-discuss mailing list
>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.communitycourtwatch.org
>> http://lists.communitycourtwatch.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-communitycourtwatch.org
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.communitycourtwatch.org
>> http://lists.communitycourtwatch.org/listinfo.cgi/discuss-communitycourtwatch.org
>> __._,_.___
>> Reply to sender <mailto:unionyes at ameritech.net?subject=Fw: [Discuss]
>> [Peace-discuss]  Fw: What hath got rot?> | Reply to group
>> <mailto:CentralILJwJ at yahoogroups.com?subject=Fw: [Discuss]
>> [Peace-discuss]  Fw: What hath got rot?> | Reply via web post
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CentralILJwJ/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJwc3V1anV0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNjI3MTE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTQ0NDYxOQRtc2dJZAM0MTEEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDcnBseQRzdGltZQMxMjY5NTYxNTk5?act=reply&messageNum=411>
>> | Start a New Topic
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CentralILJwJ/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdWZvZmZ2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNjI3MTE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTQ0NDYxOQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyNjk1NjE1OTk->
>> 
>> Messages in this topic
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CentralILJwJ/message/411;_ylc=X3oDMTMzbG9tYjVzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNjI3MTE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTQ0NDYxOQRtc2dJZAM0MTEEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDdnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMjY5NTYxNTk5BHRwY0lkAzQxMQ-->
>> (1)
>> Recent Activity:
>> 
>> Visit Your Group
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CentralILJwJ;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcmRhamtuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIzNjI3MTE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTQ0NDYxOQRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEyNjk1NjE1OTg->
>> 
>> Yahoo! Groups
>> <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaHQ3OTZwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIzNjI3MTE0BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTQ0NDYxOQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTI2OTU2MTU5OQ-->
>> 
>> Switch to: Text-Only
>> <mailto:CentralILJwJ-traditional at yahoogroups.com?subject=Change Delivery
>> Format: Traditional>, Daily Digest
>> <mailto:CentralILJwJ-digest at yahoogroups.com?subject=Email Delivery:
>> Digest> • Unsubscribe
>> <mailto:CentralILJwJ-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> •
>> Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>> .
>> 
>> __,_._,___
>
>-- This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Peace-discuss mailing list
>Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20100326/67ba4219/attachment-0001.html>