[Peace-discuss] Correction on reference to Delaware corruption

[C. G. Estabrook]

  I'm not quite so sure as Wayne is that she'll do well, but the rest of his 
analysis seems right - and much better than what we get from the hysterical 
press about teapartiers.

The Democrats desperately want to run against teapartiers, whom they're 
energetically trying to construct as racist morons.

What we should be doing is talking to those who oppose the administration - 
whether they call themselves teapartiers or not - in order to construct a 
coalition against the policies, foreign and domestic, of the US government.

If you want to be appalled at what those policies are, see 
<http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/17/obama/index.html>.

Ecrasez l'infame.  --CGE


On 9/18/10 6:41 PM, E. Wayne Johnson wrote:
> Christine O'Donnell is not Ron Paul.
>
> Neither is Ron Paul's son Rand a "Ron Paul",
> much to the dismay of many supporters of his
> principled father.
>
> I don't find that Christine is an anti-war candidate
> and she is not enlightened on health care,
> but she is strong on many issues and
> voters will identify with her that she is one of them and not part of the 
> ruling class.
>
> She holds some principles that are incompatible with the support of the war.
>
> "You can't be a fiscal conservative or any other kind of real conservative and
> be in support the war machine." - Tom Woods (anyway that's the essence of what 
> Woods said)
>
> She will do well.
>
>
> On 9/19/2010 4:40 AM, David Green wrote:
>> http://chris-floyd.com/articles/1-latest-news/2024-circle-jerks-delaware-distraction-obscures-oval-office-atrocities.html
>> It's Chris Floyd, not Alex Cockburn.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20100918/1bfb806c/attachment.html>