[Peace-discuss] Correction on reference to Delaware corruption

[E.Wayne Johnson]

I was just reminded of some definitions given by Ambrose Bierce, 
and I believe it puts the partisan perspective of racism into perspective.

AFRICAN, n.  A nigger that votes our way.

APOLOGIZE, v.i.  To lay the foundation for a future offence.

DISTANCE, n.  The only thing that the rich are willing for the poor to call theirs and keep.



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: E.Wayne Johnson 
  To: C. G. Estabrook 
  Cc: Peace Discuss 
  Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 10:21 AM
  Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Correction on reference to Delaware corruption


  O'Donnell has already done well.

  But speaking of irony and the audacity of ironic oxidations ---

  1. the Dems continually venture to play the Race card 
  especially considering their racist past (and present).

  2.  Catholic voters oft vote Democrat (despite
  the Democrat platform which is generally erosive to fundamental
  Catholic doctrine.)


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: C. G. Estabrook 
    To: E. Wayne Johnson 
    Cc: David Green ; Peace Discuss 
    Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 9:10 AM
    Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Correction on reference to Delaware corruption


    I'm not quite so sure as Wayne is that she'll do well, but the rest of his analysis seems right - and much better than what we get from the hysterical press about teapartiers. 

    The Democrats desperately want to run against teapartiers, whom they're energetically trying to construct as racist morons.

    What we should be doing is talking to those who oppose the administration - whether they call themselves teapartiers or not - in order to construct a coalition against the policies, foreign and domestic, of the US government. 

    If you want to be appalled at what those policies are, see <http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/17/obama/index.html>.

    Ecrasez l'infame.  --CGE


    On 9/18/10 6:41 PM, E. Wayne Johnson wrote: 
      Christine O'Donnell is not Ron Paul.  

      Neither is Ron Paul's son Rand a "Ron Paul", 
      much to the dismay of many supporters of his
      principled father.

      I don't find that Christine is an anti-war candidate 
      and she is not enlightened on health care,
      but she is strong on many issues and 
      voters will identify with her that she is one of them and not part of the ruling class.

      She holds some principles that are incompatible with the support of the war.

      "You can't be a fiscal conservative or any other kind of real conservative and 
      be in support the war machine." - Tom Woods (anyway that's the essence of what Woods said)

      She will do well.


      On 9/19/2010 4:40 AM, David Green wrote: 
        http://chris-floyd.com/articles/1-latest-news/2024-circle-jerks-delaware-distraction-obscures-oval-office-atrocities.html

        It's Chris Floyd, not Alex Cockburn.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Peace-discuss mailing list
  Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
  http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20100920/6438a2b0/attachment-0001.html>