[Peace-discuss] More Democrat betrayal

C. G. Estabrook galliher at illinois.edu
Sat May 7 19:22:11 CDT 2011


    29 senators: No U.S. aid for a Palestinian unity government
    Posted: 06 May 2011 12:52 PM PDT


29 U.S. senators have asked President Barack Obama Friday to cut off aid to the 
Palestinian government if it joins with Hamas, in a previously unreported letter 
(PDF) obtained by The Cable.

"The decision of Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas to form a 
unity government with Hamas - a designated terrorist group - threatens to derail 
the Middle East peace effort for the foreseeable future and to undermine the 
Palestinian Authority's relationship with the United States," begins the letter, 
which was spearheaded by Sens. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Robert Casey (D-PA).

Menendez is the third ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee 
and Casey chairs SFRC's Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs subcommittee. The 
letter was also signed by Democratic heavyweights Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), the 
chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, and Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-HI), 
who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The details of the deal between the PA and Hamas aren't entirely clear. Many of 
the sticking points between the two Palestinian factions appear to remain 
unresolved and the contents of the reconciliation deal's classified annex 
remains unknown, but, as the senators' letter notes, Hamas foreign policy chief 
Mahmoud al-Zahar has said that "our plan does not involve negotiations with 
Israel or recognizing it."

Hamas also publicly condemned the May 1 killing of Osama bin Laden by U.S. 
forces in Pakistan.

For all these reasons, the senators want Obama to make it clear that the PA will 
forfeit  U.S. foreign assistance if it goes through with the plan to join forces 
with Hamas. The United States gave the PA about $550 million in aid in fiscal 
2011, a mixture of project funding and direct cash to the government.

"As you are aware, U.S. law prohibits aid from being provided to a Palestinian 
government that includes Hamas unless the government and all its members have 
public committed to the Quartet principles," they wrote. "We urge you to conduct 
a review of the current situation and suspend aid should Hamas refuse to comply 
with Quartet conditions."

House Foreign Affairs Committee chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) agrees. 
"No taxpayer funds should go, they must not go" to the new Palestinian unity 
government, she told the Washington Post May 4.

The Obama administration is currently examining the Palestinian reconciliation 
deal, but officials have repeatedly said in recent days that any unity 
government must reject Hamas's current policies.

"Any Palestinian government must renounce violence, it must abide by past 
agreements and it must recognize Israel's right to exist," White House Chief of 
Staff Bill Daley, told the American Jewish Committee on April 28.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner repeated Daley's message at Thursday's 
press briefing, and implied that a government that includes Hamas would not be 
able to work with the United States.

"We've said very clearly that we'll work with a Palestinian Authority government 
that unambiguously and explicitly commits to nonviolence, recognition of the 
state of Israel and acceptance of previous agreements and obligations between 
the parties. And that includes the road map," Toner said. "And our position on 
Hamas has not changed. We still believe it's a foreign terrorist organization."

"The Obama Administration knows the law prohibits U.S. aid going to a 
Palestinian government in which Hamas plays any role. That's why the 
administration has said several times in the past week that the United States 
will only deal with a Palestinian government that meets the Quartet conditions 
-- renounces violence, recognizes Israel, and accepts all previous agreements," 
said former AIPAC spokesman Josh Block, now a partner at the consulting firm 
Davis-Block LLC. "If Hamas wants to transform itself, surely that would be 
welcome, but it's not likely."


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list