[Peace-discuss] Fw: Informed Comment -- you, too can subscribe...
Jenifer Cartwright
jencart13 at yahoo.com
Sun Dec 23 19:10:22 UTC 2012
Friends,
Informed Comment sends important info to my inbox almost daily. You can subscribe by emailing Juan Cole at jricole at gmail.com
--Jenifer
--- On Thu, 12/20/12, Informed Comment <jricole at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Informed Comment <jricole at gmail.com>
Subject: Informed Comment
To: jencart13 at yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, December 20, 2012, 3:27 PM
Informed Comment
#yiv1999898923 h1 a:hover {background-color:#888;color:#fff important;}
#yiv1999898923 div#yiv1999898923emailbody table#yiv1999898923itemcontentlist tr td div ul {
list-style-type:square;padding-left:1em;}
#yiv1999898923 div#yiv1999898923emailbody table#yiv1999898923itemcontentlist tr td div blockquote {
padding-left:6px;border-left:6px solid #dadada;margin-left:1em;}
#yiv1999898923 div#yiv1999898923emailbody table#yiv1999898923itemcontentlist tr td div li {
margin-bottom:1em;margin-left:1em;}
#yiv1999898923 table#yiv1999898923itemcontentlist tr td a:link, #yiv1999898923 table#yiv1999898923itemcontentlist tr td a:visited, #yiv1999898923 table#yiv1999898923itemcontentlist tr td a:active, #yiv1999898923 ul#yiv1999898923summarylist li a {
color:#000099;font-weight:bold;text-decoration:none;}
#yiv1999898923 img {border:none;}
Informed Comment
UN Security Council Condemns Further Israeli Squatting on Palestinian Land, with Rogue State US Vetoing
Human Rights Abuses in Pakistan’s Tribal Belt: Amnesty Int’l Report (Ross)
Why our Hair is not on Fire about Cutting Emissions, and what to do about it (Giesen)
UN Security Council Condemns Further Israeli Squatting on Palestinian Land, with Rogue State US Vetoing
Posted: 19 Dec 2012 11:34 PM PST
The US acted again as the rogue state at the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday, with the other 14 members issuing statements condemning Israeli plans for vast further theft of Palestinian land in the West Bank and installing squatters on it, in a step designed to cut the West Bank in two and make forever impossible a two-state solution to the problem of Palestinian statelessness.
The European Bloc, the non-aligned bloc, Russia and China all did an end run around the ruling Likud Party’s enabler, the Obama administration, which made clear it would veto a UNSC condemnation of the illegal Israeli actions. The significance of the veto is that it prevents any sanctions from being applied to Israel, despite the latter’s clear violations of international law.
The US move to once again screw the Palestinians over and protect Israel from any sanctions for its aggressive annexation of other people’s property did not derive from a conviction that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was justified in the installation of thousands of new squatters on Palestinian territory. The US rejects the plan, too. It just makes sure that international law never has any teeth when it comes to Israel.
The bankruptcy of the US position on this matter is obvious if we consider that Washington has vigorously pressed the UNSC for sanctions on Iran, and has imposed its own draconian sanctions and financial blockade, even though it is not proved that Iran is actually in violation of international law. Iranian children are being deprived of medicine by the US vindictiveness and manipulation of the UN, but the Israeli officials all seem to be overweight from eating too well off the profits they make from exploiting the Palestinians’ resources, and Washington runs interference for their criminal activities.
UN Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs Jeffrey Feltman said of Netanyahu’s bank robbery: “If implemented, these plans would represent an almost fatal blow to remaining chances of securing a two-state solution. . . We strongly urge the Israeli government to heed the wide international calls to rescind these plans.”
The European Union statement, which you will never, ever see on American television, is here:
The problem of Palestinian statelessness was created by the 1947-1948 Zionist ethnic cleansing campaign against Palestinian villagers, which resulted in 720,000 out of 1.2 million being kicked out of their homes, with the Jewish immigrants moving into them without paying any compensation. The League of Nations had recognized Palestine as a Class A Mandate scheduled for statehood at the Versailles peace conferences, and the British mandatory authorities repeated this pledge in their 1939 White Paper, but instead European Jewish immigrants displaced the locals and made them a homeless nation, a nation without rights of citizenship in a state. Now the far right wing nationalist parties, the Likud and Israel Beitenu, are trying to make sure yet another generation of Palestinians lives and dies without having a passport or a country that could so much as back their claim to own their own homes.
Human Rights Abuses in Pakistan’s Tribal Belt: Amnesty Int’l Report (Ross)
Posted: 19 Dec 2012 09:30 PM PST
Alice K. Ross writes at the Bureau of Investigative Journalism:
Last week Amnesty International highlighted just how troubled this tribal region is, charting human rights abuses by both the Pakistani army and the Pakistani Taliban.
The Hands of Cruelty demonstrates how the region’s estimated civilian population of three million, is trapped between two opposing yet similarly vicious forces.
The report accuses the Pakistan army of rampant summary detentions with no due process, torture and deaths in custody. Victims recount being accused of links to the Taliban on flimsy evidence, and being beaten and tortured in detention. And they are the ones who lived to tell the tale. The report also includes testimony of families called in to pick up the bodies of their loved ones, and how they found signs of ill-treatment and torture on their bodies.
See the Bureau’s investigation into drone strikes on Pakistan
Amnesty has encountered 39 cases of ‘enforced disappearance’ in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas that it says are linked to the Army. This figure, it claims, could be the tip of an iceberg, as local courts indicate there are thousands in custody, many whose families have no idea where they are.
The Taliban, meanwhile, dispenses its own form of summary ‘justice’, says the report. Singled out, according to Amnesty, are those the Taliban accuses of spying, supporting the ‘enemy’ or backing agendas that militants believe are ‘un-Islamic’, such as women’s rights. This includes staging trials that fail to meet international standards for justice and human rights, and which often end in summary executions.
‘The Taliban and other groups have particularly targeted human rights activists, humanitarian workers, journalists and individuals accused of spying,’ Amnesty suggests. And of course, targeting these individuals means information about the lives of people in the region is even scarcer.
In other cases, militants ignore any semblance of a trial and simply execute those they accuse of breaking their laws. There are signs that the Taliban uses executions of alleged spies and the mutilations of their bodies to discourage others who may be tempted to turn informant.
The tribal region is often described as ‘lawless’. But it’s easy to overlook the impact that lawlessness has. Amnesty lays the blame for the appalling litany of abuses charted in the report squarely at the door of the government, which it says has failed to ‘extend the hands of justice to the Tribal Areas’. This has given both the Army and Taliban ‘total impunity’, it adds.
‘Without urgent action by the Pakistan government to guarantee respect for human rights in the Tribal Areas, millions will continue to be locked in a perpetual state of lawlessness,’ the report notes.
The human-rights implications of the CIA’s drone campaign on the region’s civilian population are coming under increasing international scrutiny. But as The Hands of Cruelty indicates, drone strikes are far from the only threat to the human rights of those living in the tribal belt.
Read the full report
————–
Mirrored from The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
Why our Hair is not on Fire about Cutting Emissions, and what to do about it (Giesen)
Posted: 19 Dec 2012 09:05 PM PST
Tom Giesen writes in a guest column for Informed Comment:
Multiple reasons why global warming mitigation will fail
Greenhouse gas emissions are still increasing. The yearly increases look like this:
• 1990s 2.7%,
• 2000 – 2007 3.5%,
• 2009 – 2010 5.6%,
No action to cut greenhouse gas emissions at the scale or pace needed has begun. Avoiding a 4 degrees Centrigrade (7.2 degrees F.) warming appears impossible due to global inaction, yet that kind of climate change would be a catastrophe. Here are the top ten reasons why:
1. Delayed consequences. Warming is a current phenomenon, but most of the damage is in the future, like a time-delayed bomb – we emit now and suffer the consequences later. Because it is a future event, neither citizens nor politicians feel sufficient urgency. If we thought we had to take drastic action to save New Orleans from disappearing a decade hence, we might be more likely to try. But if the time scale is 50 or 100 years, we have difficulty getting our heads around that. Reducing emissions must start now – we cannot wait for dramatic events, as by then it will be too late. Remember: on any human time scale, warming is irreversible. It will take 100,000 years for the extra carbon to be washed out of the atmosphere by the oceans and certain kinds of rock on the earth’s surface.
2. Belief in the necessity of growth! The sanctity of growth in the economy and in population is the real American religion. What all cities/communities want is more economic and population growth. In the 19th and 20th centuries, economic and population growth were enabled by oil, coal and (later) gas, which all became critically important to our economy. But growth is now impossible without cheap and abundant fossil fuels, and they are finite and becoming prohibitively expensive – causing recessions. But we still believe in unlimited growth and resource abundance – geology and physics be damned!
3. Energy cornucopia! Big Carbon boosters claim that we will have greatly increased production from fracked oil and gas wells. In the short term, fracked oil and gas is lowering prices, which hurts green energy entrepreneurs. The sad thing is that the fracking “miracle” is a mirage in the longer term. Depletion rates for hydraulically fractured (fracked) wells in shale are high (oil: 40%/year on year; gas: 75% year on year). Drilling is financed by Wall Street, and drillers are not disclosing depletion rates, as that would make financing difficult. There is not enough inexpensive petroleum in North America to actually make the US anything like energy-independent, regardless of what the boosters say. The cost of just producing fracked oil (much less making a profit) is about today’s price on futures markets – $85 -90/bbl. The “booms” in oil and gas are mostly just Wall Street bubbles like the real estate and internet bubbles of recent
years. Conventional (cheap) fossil fuels are declining resources, and fracked, deep water, oil sands and arctic sources are prohibitively expensive. But no matter – the press is still full of empty chatter about the US out-producing Saudi Arabia and being energy independent.
4. Individualism. Devotees of individualism dislike cooperative processes, preferring go-it-alone methods. Cutting emissions requires a globally cooperative effort, and such cooperative projects might feel to individualists like unacceptable collectivism, and hence resisted. Many in the US demonize any multi-nation cooperation.
5. Anti-intellectualism. Many in America have not moved beyond medieval science. Most Americans accept using the fruits of modern science (cars, airplanes, modern medicine, imaging tools (MRI, etc.), exotic drugs, the internet, remote sensing, etc.), but that does not imply an understanding or acceptance of scientific discipline, processes or of scientists. Rationality does not often apply in scientific issues with political overtones, or with personal preferences, and hence global warming, the end of cheap oil, and other issues are falsely labeled as scientific frauds by opponents of science.
6. American exceptionalism. We imagine we are different from other nations, an exception to many of the rules that govern other people and other nations. Some of that exceptionalism is a repudiation of European social/political customs, from which some colonial settlers fled. Some of it is home-grown, as exemplified by the American Dream myth. Some of it stems from the hugeness of our economy and of our military. But in all cases what many Americans accept is that we are not subject to the same rules as other nations, and that is reflected in our reluctance to participate equally (or at all) in international treaties and other agreements – such as those related to land mines, cluster bombs, and (even more destructive) CO2 emissions.
7. Failure of international cooperation. It is nearly universally believed that the solution to the problem of warming lies in global treaties involving all nations and dealing with emissions reductions and related equity/financial issues. Warming cannot be mitigated nation-by-nation, as cheating would be rampant, with efforts to gain advantage at other nations’ expense. But international negotiations to agree to a treaty to reduce emissions have so far proved useless, as the process is long on rhetoric and intention, and bereft of action. For example, if we wish to avoid a climate warmed by 4 degrees Centigrade, many if not most scientists feel that emissions reductions must begin now. But the new agreement in Doha is to have a new treaty by 2015 to start reducing emissions in 2020 – 8 years from now. The process seems a farce, completely disconnected from the science that ought to inform it, and it fails to reflect the incredible urgency of the
issue. It’s now 25 years since James Hansen warned Congress, and we have done nothing. Nothing.
8. Difficulties of monitoring and assuring compliance. Samuel Hays, the environmental historian, famously wrote that passing a law is just half of the process – implementing and enforcing the law is the other half. That will be true for any emissions treaty ever adopted. How do you closely monitor emissions of a gas which quickly diffuses globally in the atmosphere? How do you closely monitor all production and use of fossil fuels? How do you monitor and control land use change (deforestation) before the deed is done? Etc.
9. Greed. The production of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) is at historic high levels, and much of the resource now being sold was developed at a time when developing wells and mines was much cheaper than today. But the price of crude oil is 3 times higher today than it was just 13 years ago, and the price of coal is increasing. That leaves lots of “room” for incredible profits. Demand is outstripping supply: prices, over time, will continue to rise. Greed permeates political life as well: worldwide, governments’ subsidies to fossil fuel producers now total $100,000,000,000 a year, and subsidies to consumers are $675,000,000,000. The subsidies are like crack cocaine – the addiction is extremely difficult to treat.
10. Disinformation. The fossil fuel industry lavishly funds global warming deniers and skeptics – the “lavish” funding is chump change in view of current profits. At the same moment as they fund deniers and skeptics, oil companies now claim to support global warming science (see their websites), but minimize the risks of high levels of cumulative emissions. Hypocrisy reigns!
If we follow the path we are on, the path of no cutting back on emissions, and in fact the path of continued increases in the rate of increase of emissions, our civilization will very possibly collapse. We need campaigns to contact legislators, marches in the streets, and, in the likely event those fail, civil disobedience. We must get policy-makers’ attention and secure significant reductions in emissions of greenhouse gasses. A carbon fee rebated to taxpayers is the most effective means to do that. And although big cuts in emissions will largely come from changes in government and corporate policy, in our own households, we must strive to reduce reduce our energy use. We owe it to our children and grandchildren to create a new, smaller, low-energy, and humane society.
___________________
Tom Giesen has a BA, MFA and MS (Forestry), and has been teaching a course on Global Change at the University of Oregon as an adjunct.
You are subscribed to email updates from Informed Comment
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20121223/b607c17e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list