[Peace-discuss] [SDaS] In response to recent emails and IMC case

Wed Nov 14 15:39:29 UTC 2012

And Yet Also:

"I think Robert means well in what he is doing, but I think his
horizon is limited by his relationships. His horizon appears to be:
what can't you achieve by negotiating with people inside the IMC
[or, perhaps: what can you achieve by not negotiating with people inside the IMC]."

So, I'm not sure what value there is is saying that someone should be dismissed--that someone can't help someone else get the needs met that they perceive from their points of view--simply by virtue of the fact that they're looking at another horizon.

The Jains would say all of us (you, me, everyone) can only have a partial understanding of the truth, so let's not fight about it. Understanding that we all have different horizons of view means necessarily taking them into account, rather than trying to exclude or rule any of them out. Ruling them out (as the verb "rule" points to) belies this as a gesture of (attempted) power-over, which in the current context is problematic to say the least.

On 11/14/2012 5:06 AM, Robert Naiman wrote:
> I think Rachel means well in what she is doing, but I think her
> horizon is limited by her relationships. Her horizon appears to be:
> what can you achieve by negotiating with people inside the IMC. I
> think that's great as far as it goes. But I think that if you are
> outside the IMC, and if you have interests that can't be protected by
> the IMC, then you have a different horizon.
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:49 AM, Brussel, Morton K <brussel at illinois.edu> wrote:
>> Insofar as the incident that brought all this discussion into play, I find
>> your response at best equivocal, mushy if I may say so.
>> Yes, we should always be sensitive to the complexities of race, poverty,
>> crime and gender. But sometimes one must address the issue at hand, which
>> you do not do, presumably for fear that the IMC will be compromised.
>>
>> This said, I personally do not know what the facts of the matter are; they
>> seem to be hidden behind ambiguous comments.
>>
>> Yes, long live the IMC, but…?
>>
>> --mkb
>>
>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Rachel Storm wrote:
>>
>> Julianne et al,
>>
>> Thank you for your e-mail and calling for a mindfulness and sensitivity on
>> an issue that
>> many of us have relationships to or personal experience with in one way or
>> another.
>>
>> I was privileged to be able to listen and feel heard with folks who came
>> together last night to
>> discuss our concerns and urge support and I encourage those of us who are
>> able/willing to
>> continue to build dialogue in our community in order to seek healing,
>> accountability, and
>> encouraging coming together, not tearing apart, in moments like these.
>>
>> These issues don't exist in isolation and if we're concerned about
>> injustice, we must remain
>> ever vigilant about how important it is for us to support one another where
>> possible. While
>> denial around these issues are commonplace everywhere, I've seen outrage,
>> care, support,
>> love, and a desire to heal. Let's grow those efforts. Our strength as a
>> community, and more
>> importantly as an activist community, will be demonstrated through our
>> ability to hold many
>> concerns at once--refusing to allow legal and social structures to tear us
>> apart and away from
>> those concerns.
>>
>> I've been recommending The Revolution Starts at Home as a great resource.
>> The zine is online
>> here, but it will soon be published as a book for purchase with additional
>> chapters, etc.
>>
>> Julianne mentions community accountability and I think this is key to
>> helping us stay strong
>> and to continue to build our power as a community, so here's some resources
>> on community
>> accountability:
>>
>> INCITE Women of Color Against Violence "Community Accountability"
>> http://www.incite-national.org/index.php?s=114
>>
>> Transformative Justice
>> http://www.transformativejustice.eu/?page_id=16
>>
>> Creative Interventions Toolkit on Community Accountability
>> http://www.creative-interventions.org/about/ci-projects/community-based-interventions-project/
>>
>> Generation Five
>> http://www.generationfive.org/
>>
>> There is talk of creating a reading/practice group that will explore
>> community accountability. This,
>> I'm hopeful, will present us with an opportunity to ask for accountability
>> both from ourselves and
>> each other--not as a supplement for more formal redress from folks in
>> leadership positions, but
>> because we all have a role in creating safe, supportive community.
>>
>> Additionally, I'd like to ensure everyone knows how to access local
>> resources* addressing
>> sexual assault, advocacy, anti-violence, and healing after violence:
>>
>> Rape, Advocacy, Counseling and Education Services (RACES)
>> http://www.cu-races.org/
>> 24-Hour Rape Crisis Hotline: 1.217.384.4444
>>
>> Women's Resources Center, University of Illinois
>> www.go.illinois.edu/wrc
>> Tel. 217-333-3137
>>
>> A Woman's Place/Center for Women in Transition
>> http://www.cwt-cu.org/html/dv_services.html
>> Tel. 217-352-7151
>>
>> Cognition Works
>> http://www.cognitionworks.org/
>> Tel. 217-239-0142
>>
>> *This is by no means an exhaustive list, but I wanted to list a few
>> important resources.
>>
>> Thanks for listening.
>>
>> Rachel
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Julianne Panagacos
>> <julianne.panagacos at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Bob,
>>>
>>> I think the research you are proposing is important work though I find
>>> it triggering to have emails in my inbox everyday with rape in the
>>> title, especially when it is so close to home. On other listservs that
>>> I am on when there is policy of putting something along the lines of
>>> "potentially triggering material" in the title so that people can
>>> choose to read it when they are ready to read about alleged sexual
>>> assault. Are you (and others if you want to answer) willing to start
>>> doing that?
>>>
>>> I think it is important to acknowledge that a lot of people that care
>>> about and use the IMC are mourning and in shock, which does not imply
>>> denial. In other radical groups and scenes I've been part of and heard
>>> of, there are community accountability processes that have been
>>> created and executed in order to use different models of justice than
>>> the model of justice imposed on us by the state. That is also not
>>> denial, though you may not hear about it in a news paper. Being that
>>> this allegation is already being pursed legally, I think it is most
>>> important to make sure that there are resources for people- the
>>> victim, defendant, families of those two parties and community
>>> members,  to talk and process and support each other.
>>>
>>> I hope emails to come are in the spirit of supporting ourselves though
>>> a hard time.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Julianne
>>>
>>> On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Robert Naiman
>>> <naiman at justforeignpolicy.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> According to the News-Gazette, the next court date in the IMC rape
>>>> case is November 20:
>>>>
>>>> Urbana man charged with sex assault
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I heard a report that someone was trying to organize a "cheerleading
>>>> squad" at the courthouse in support of the accused rapist.
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone tell me if there is any truth to this report?
>>>>
>>>> I'm writing an expose for a national progressive website on rape
>>>> denialism on the left, and the IMC rape case is going to be my case
>>>> study.
>>>>
>>>> If anyone would like to be interviewed for this article, please let me
>>>> know.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Robert Naiman
>>>> Policy Director
>>>> Just Foreign Policy
>>>> www.justforeignpolicy.org
>>>> naiman at justforeignpolicy.org
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> School for Designing a Society listserv:
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sdas-list
>>>> To participate, email: sdas-list at googlegroups.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, email: sdas-list+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> School for Designing a Society listserv:
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sdas-list
>>> To participate, email: sdas-list at googlegroups.com
>>> To unsubscribe, email: sdas-list+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Peace-discuss mailing list
>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
If you think you're stupid, then you're not qualified to say.