[Peace-discuss] prepare, please
Susan Parenti
sparenti at illinois.edu
Sun Nov 18 22:41:36 UTC 2012
> Notes from the Nov. 5 meeting, taken by Theresa Scott.
> ocCUpy Minutes
> November 5, 2012
>
> Next meeting: Monday, November 12, 2012, IMC
> Invited speaker: Francisco Baires, Community Programs Director, YMCA
>
> In attendance: Susan, Jesse F., Ya’aqov, Dave, Pam, Sandra, Kara,
> Chris H., Ian, Doug, Theresa, Paul, Karen, Stuart
>
> Susan gave the charge for the group: This was the 2nd of 3 meetings
> where we are trying to pick up ocCUpy where it left off in the summer.
>
> Susan read the notes of what people had shared from the previous
> week. Among the issues raised were: ocCUpy might better articulate
> the voices and needs of marginalized people; StrikeDebt.; host a
> debtors’ forum (connect with GEO to talk about student debt);
> foreclosures; we need to find a way to gauge our success as we move
> forward; while Occupy identified a hurt, it can also be viewed as a
> tactic; look at Campus Management; find creative ways for protest;
> look at the area of Champaign that the city is looking to gentrify
> and see how we can support the dispossessed; look at corporate
> influence; focus on class and focus on change.
>
> Paul wanted to learn who was funding the Gill/Davis campaigns and
> how Citizens United is playing itself out locally. Ian said that
> the Free Press has the information that Paul wanted to look at, that
> WCIA had looked at that issue already.
>
> Following the reprisal of last week’s issues, Susan asked for
> further reflections on what was shared or additional thoughts about
> where ocCUpy might go.
>
> Jesse, who is the local Occupy movement’s founding father, said that
> he dropped out because he didn’t see the weekly corner protests
> working with just 6 to 10 people. He felt that the meetings were
> too long, people were obnoxious, most couldn’t talk, and the people
> who wanted to contribute couldn’t. He shared that he presently does
> things online and wants to present some ideas he has to the group
> next week. He said that in Tel Aviv, ½ million people were
> protesting in a country of 6 million. In Spain, every day unions
> are protesting. Why not here? Given national issues like the debt,
> how can we put all them all together and generate a bigger audience
> for all we want to do? Jesse feels we should abandon the street
> corner protests until we get greater numbers. Jesse asked if the
> group was opposed to using social media. The idea that he will
> present to the group next week contains that component (the group
> shared that while they were not opposed to social media, we must
> take care to see that it does not end there, that there is actually
> action taking place).
>
> David posed the question of how OWS occurred? (See recent email
> from Susan containing links supplied by Rich P. for history) We need
> to think about why it captured public attention like a prairie
> fire. Whatever OCU does, we need more people. Other organizations
> in town are focused on specific areas of need. We need to maintain
> a presence out there and find our focus. David also asked if anyone
> is interested in helping out on Occupy the Air.
>
> Pam mentioned that Bill G. said that he would like to see people out
> in the neighborhoods and talking with them to get a feeling where
> they are coming from. Pam gave the example of caroling in Section 8
> housing last year. Everyone was very friendly and supportive. She
> asked if anyone was interested in canvassing with her. She feels
> that if you have a questionnaire, it helps you to have a
> conversation which is the point of the face-to-face. Stuart shared
> that when he went door-to-door, he met a lot of great people whom he
> felt should be part of ocCUpy. Pam asked for help in designing any
> questionnaire that might be used.
>
> Ya’aqov used the metaphor of Bizet who, after experiencing failure
> with his opera Carmen, was forced to work with a sextet that was at
> his disposal. He was forced to write for them; he was stuck with
> them. Ya’aqov said that the people in ocCUpy are our sextet, that
> this is our ensemble and we should tend to each other. We are all
> we have and we should take the needs/interests of those in the group
> into account. Numbers do not matter. He also said that doing
> creative things like caroling may draw in people if we may not get
> from holding long meetings.
>
> Ian said he wanted to know if the website should continue.
> Presently it is not getting many hits. He is willing to continue to
> work on it if there is a desire. We can use the site for
> publicizing events. It is also good for like-minded people to use
> the forum to discuss ideas, then work on projects.
>
> There was then a discussion about the listserv. Can we get the
> listserv to be a functional organizational tool rather than one used
> for discussions and posts? Perhaps it should only be for
> messages. Conversation should not be stifled but it should be
> limited for announcements. Stuart shared that the Peace listserv
> and Peace Discuss listserv are 2 separate things.
>
> Kara said that she had sort of forgotten about OWS once it fell off
> the national radar. She felt it might be good to plant little
> reminders in people’s faces that say: We’re still here. We’re
> still angry. Not that much has changed. Example: putting up small
> images such as things we loved about Occupy or things that still
> make us angry. Perhaps we could go to a corporate building and post
> some of these images in a giant collage. Have people add to it
> gradually. She will bring an image next week as an example of what
> she means and encouraged all of us to do the same.
>
> Sandra shared that people seemed to notice her name when we posted
> “ocCUpy was here” signs each week after our weekly protest with our
> names on them. She said that if we win the referendum on
> leafletting, we can start doing stuff. Maybe go to Lincoln Square
> and actually do what we wanted. Make a presence in the towns.
>
> Karen shared that we can make our own media. We can submit letters
> to the newspaper, make our own stories for the Daily Illini, the
> Publici, the News Gazette, etc.
>
> Chris shared that the movement is about presence. As a movement, we
> need to have direction. One of the problems that OWS had was that
> its direction was vague. Many are frustrated with it not going
> anywhere. Just not seeing the impact. There is lingering despair
> and we need to make it ironic or humorous. We should find creative
> ways to make serious issues into something that has impact on
> peoples’ lives in a meaningful, local level. Need new ideas to make
> it fresh again and remind people it is still happening.
>
> Susan shared that prior ocCUpy meetings featured a lot of
> competitiveness, with men talking and interrupting and feeling the
> need to go on very long. There seemed to be no consciousness that
> we have lives or commitments. She proposed that future meetings be
> built on a preferential option for women. [I may not be describing
> this accurately and I can correct it in future minutes] A method
> meaning, preferential option for the poor, for women. Susan shared
> how the first meetings of AWARE were conducted based on feminism: at
> the start of the meeting, there was some sort of art, something
> new. Then there was information, reports from what people were
> working on. It lasted only one hour. In the second hour, there
> were working groups to which you could contribute or you could stay
> and simply chat. There were greeters and priority was given to
> newcomers who were asked to share first. In this way, there was a
> personal connection with newcomers. There was a feeling of
> compassion and caring in the meetings that made people want to
> return to be a part of an ensemble such as that. There was
> consensus in that if you wanted to do something crazy, you needed to
> get people’s approval.
>
> Pam shared that when she first started going to meetings, we were
> trying to do everything like OWS, even in the way we conversed.
> There was lots of sign language. She said she felt inhibited to
> talk because she may have said the wrong thing. Similarly, she is
> concerned that we maybe not put a rule on something as far as
> feminism in the way we conduct our meetings.
>
> Susan shared that we need language. She said that there art that is
> built on the concept of the wound. Artists would make a bandage of
> the hurt. In our case, we need a way to describe the hurt. What
> does our would look like? How can we describe it?
>
> NEXT WEEK: Susan and Stuart have invited Franciso Baires,
> Community Programs Director of the YMCA, to speak with us on
> November 12th. We are looking to him for ideas around direct
> action, cultural change, and structural change.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OccupyCU mailing list
> OccupyCU at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/occupycu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20121118/5729cde5/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list