[Peace-discuss] Peace and non-tranquility

[Gregg Gordon]

Maybe the elderly academic bears part of that responsibility.




________________________________
 From: C. G. Estabrook <cge at shout.net>
To: Stuart Levy <stuartnlevy at gmail.com> 
Cc: Paul Mueth <paulmueth at yahoo.com>; Peace Discuss <peace-discuss at anti-war.net>; Gregg Gordon <ggregg79 at yahoo.com>; ocCUpy <occupycu at lists.chambana.net>; Stan Waggoner <swag901 at ymail.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2012 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: Peace and non-tranquility
 
It's a sign of the fecklessnes of the anti-war movement that a local organization designed to hamper the government's crimes has been reduced to spending time trying to stop an elderly academic from posting to its email list.

On Sep 3, 2012, at 11:33 PM, Stuart Levy <stuartnlevy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Please - Stan, Carl, Paul, everybody - don't reply to the Peace list even if someone else did.  Jenifer is right.
> 
> I've already heard from one dear friend and long-time AWAREist who is (only) on the peace list.  He wrote me this afternoon in distress, asking to be taken off the peace-discuss and occupy lists because he is receiving more messages than he can handle.  In fact, he was already on *only* the peace list, not on the other two.
> 
> Also, I'm with Chris Goodrow.  As a reader of peace-discuss and occupyCU, I'm really not that interested in disputes over the history of News from Neptune, even though I've enjoyed the past and present incarnations of that program.  Is this an argument that needs to go before hundreds of people?
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20120905/bb867b46/attachment.html>