[Peace-discuss] [OccupyCU] More local censorship

[E. Wayne Johnson]

I think that Ya'aqov has it exactly right.

Any speaking out in favour of Bradley Manning is exactly Bashing 
(figuratively) Mr. O'Bama,
pure and simple.

O'Bama is the sole individual responsible for the retention and torture 
of Manning.

It's not something that "just goes with the job, Honey Child".

The retention and torture of Debs Manning is an active personal choice 
on the part of Wilson Barack Obama,
and no one can utter, write, or suggest even one syllable in favour
of Manning without engaging in the brutal sport of O'Bashing.

Conversely, all those who support and defend Obama do subscribe to and 
materially support and
are meaningful participatory accomplices to the detention, torture, and 
misery of Bradley Manning,
who is himself a genuine hero.

If you want to look at Obot as just a pawn, a brainless empty shell, a 
machine programmed to
do the bidding of the Wall Street Banksters and other 0.001%-ers, who
just happens to be Occupy-ing the Oval Orifice as the head of the 
administration -
well, I would say you are pretty observant.  But it's no reason not to 
call for Obama's
trial as a war criminal and enemy of much of what could be called good.

Of course, individual members of Occupy are fwee to do as they wish.


On 9/7/2012 11:13 PM, Chris Goodrow wrote:
> A few things.  From a pure sense, Occupy in itself is/was a non 
> partisan movement.  Members of Occupy, however, are not quite so non 
> partisan for the most part.  Taking a stand in favor of Bradley 
> Manning is not going against Obama himself, but rather him allowing 
> Bradley Manning to be held for this long without trial and in the 
> conditions he's been held.  While going against many policies that are 
> now in place may appear to be going against Obama, I really don't look 
> at it that way.  I look at it more as going against many policies this 
> current administration currently has in place.  Obama just happens to 
> be at the head of this administration.  I personally feel that doing 
> anything differently just because there is an election coming up is 
> going against the spirit of Occupy. Of course, individual members of 
> Occupy are free to do as they wish.
>
> Chris Goodrow
> (217) 898-5039
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: cge at shout.net
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:49:17 -0500
> To: yaaqovz at gmail.com
> CC: Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net; sf-core at yahoogroups.com; 
> occupyCU at lists.chambana.net
> Subject: [OccupyCU] More local censorship
>
> You can't handle the truth, eh, Ya'aqov?
>
> And you presume to speak for all of the local Occupy folks?
>
> I trust you're informing them of the reasons for your limitations on 
> free speech.
>
> What have I written from which the eyes of the local Occupiers must be 
> protected?
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2012, at 9:41 AM, ya'aQov <yaaqovz at gmail.com 
> <mailto:yaaqovz at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     /I created a filter dispatching to DELETE messages send from your
>     email in effect until 11-4-2012; sorry, your research didn't
>     inspire my dialectical thinking, Ya'aqov.
>     /
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ OccupyCU mailing list 
> OccupyCU at lists.chambana.net 
> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/occupycu
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> http://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20120907/9bf7d391/attachment.html>