[Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8, 2013.

["E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森"]

I think the way to consider 9-11 is to take it as a whole at
first rather than to question specific issues.

There may be some flaws errors misconceptions in the specifics.

But in the big picture most of us can agree that there was
FRAUD on a massive scale, whether it be in the Patriot Act
and other invasions of personal liberty, or the Fraudulent
War in Iraq and Afghanistan, the collapse of the buildings,
the planes, etc.

Everyone was lied to on a massive scale.

There were so many lies that it is hard to find out where
they started and stopped.

But I think that everyone can agreed that lies were told
and opportunities for oppression were taken.

Give me an F!  (F!)......

What's that spell?  FISH!!!  (the original fish cheer)

There is something about the whole thing that is fishy and rotten.

Many hypotheses about the source of the smell.

It's a bird!  It's a plane!  It's a frog!

Not bird or plane or even frog.
Just little ol' me.


On 08/20/13 12:08, Tracy Postert wrote:
> There have been many "leaks" related to 9/11. Sibel Edmonds, as one 
> example.
> But what she leaked about wasn't related to the attacks of 9/11. It 
> was all about
> Arabs, when Arabs played no role in the attacks. Her whistleblowing 
> ended up
> supporting the hijack conspiracy theory, which tells me that the US 
> government
> doesn't actually know what happened on 9/11.
>
> I realize that if you still think hijackings happened, then you're 
> wishing I would
> shut up. But hijackings didn't happen, and you just have to accept it 
> and move
> on if you want to catch the 9/11 perps.
>
> Hijackings is not outside the realm of commonly understood physical 
> principles.
> Those buildings going down because of a "plane crash" is beyond the realm
> of commonly understood physical principles. That doesn't mean that the 
> laws
> of physics were violated on 9/11. Rather, what it means is that there 
> are some
> laws of physics that we don't fully understand that were at play on 9/11.
>
> Just like very few people knew about atom bombs before Hiroshima,
> very few people know of this advanced weaponry and it's effects on steel
> buildings. People want to know the name of it, so I call it "cold 
> fission".
>
> If some more appropriate word surfaces in the future that more accurately
> describes the process, I'll abandon the phrase, but for now, I call it
> cold fission.
>
> The WTC complex, and all of its contents, were turned into powder at
> low temperature. Cold fission, for now, is my best explanation.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org>
>
>
> But a big problem is that there haven't been any leaks coming forward.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20130820/05cb287a/attachment.html>