[Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8, 2013.

[Stephen Francis]

What is 'magnetic induction heating?....have you got scientific evidence?... companies involved?  governments involved? people involved?


________________________________
 From: E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org>
To: Stephen Francis <stephenf1113 at yahoo.com> 
Cc: Tracy Postert <tracypostert at yahoo.com>; "peace at lists.chambana.net" <peace at lists.chambana.net>; "peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; "sftalk at yahoogroups.com" <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>; Wayne Coste <wcoste at ae911truth.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8, 2013.
 


magnetic induction heating?


On 08/20/13 20:43, Stephen Francis wrote: 
Tracy brings up an important point I believe has not
gotten enough attention by the MSM or even the 9/11 Truth movement.
>That
is... what looked like monstrous hot pyroclastic clouds rolling away
from the falling WTC towers on 9/11 were not hot.
>They
were not hot enough to burn people or the tremendous amount of paper
strewn all over the streets...
>This
is very odd and totally supports her views as a PhD scientist that 9/11
WTC destruction was "beyond the realm
of commonly understood physical principles".  She will be discussing
this at the conference.   
>How it may lead to 'advanced weapons' being used, I have no
idea, but we have to keep an open mind and go where the evidence points
us.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Tracy Postert <tracypostert at yahoo.com>
>To: E. Wayne Johnson
朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org>; Stephen Francis <stephenf1113 at yahoo.com> 
>Cc: "peace at lists.chambana.net" <peace at lists.chambana.net>; "peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; "sftalk at yahoogroups.com" <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>; Wayne Coste <wcoste at ae911truth.org>; occupycu <occupyCU at lists.chambana.net> 
>Sent: Monday, August
19, 2013 9:08 PM
>Subject: Re:
[Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8,
2013.
> 
>
>
>There
have been many "leaks" related to 9/11. Sibel Edmonds, as one example.
>But what she leaked about wasn't related to the attacks of 9/11. It was
all about
>Arabs, when Arabs played no role in the attacks. Her whistleblowing
ended up
>supporting the hijack conspiracy theory, which tells me that the US
government
>doesn't actually know what happened on 9/11. 
>
>I realize that if you still think hijackings happened, then you're
wishing I would
>shut up. But hijackings didn't happen, and you just have to accept it
and move
>on if you want to catch the 9/11 perps.
>
>Hijackings is not outside the realm of commonly understood physical
principles.
>Those buildings going down because of a "plane crash" is beyond the
realm
>of commonly understood physical principles. That doesn't mean that the
laws
>of physics were violated on 9/11. Rather, what it means is that there
are some
>laws of physics that we don't fully understand that were at play on
9/11.
>
>Just like very few people knew about atom bombs before Hiroshima,
>very few people know of this advanced weaponry and it's effects on steel
>buildings. People want to know the name of it, so I call it "cold
fission".
>
>If some more appropriate word surfaces in the future that more
accurately
>describes the process, I'll abandon the phrase, but for now, I call it
>cold fission.
>
>The WTC complex, and all of its contents, were turned into powder at
>low temperature. Cold fission, for now, is my best explanation.
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org>
>
>
>But a big problem is that there haven't been any leaks coming forward.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20130820/f12cf6e4/attachment-0001.html>