[Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth Conference, Sep 8, 2013.

"E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森" ewj at pigsqq.org
Tue Aug 20 13:17:30 UTC 2013


magnetic induction heating?


On 08/20/13 20:43, Stephen Francis wrote:
> Tracy brings up an important point I believe has not gotten enough 
> attention by the MSM or even the 9/11 Truth movement.
> That is... what looked like monstrous hot pyroclastic clouds rolling 
> away from the falling WTC towers on 9/11 were not hot.
> They were not hot enough to burn people or the tremendous amount of 
> paper strewn all over the streets...
> This is very odd and totally supports her views as a PhD scientist 
> that 9/11 WTC destruction was "beyond the realm
> of commonly understood physical principles".  She will be discussing 
> this at the conference.
> How it may lead to 'advanced weapons' being used, I have no idea, but 
> we have to keep an open mind and go where the evidence points us.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Tracy Postert <tracypostert at yahoo.com>
> *To:* E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org>; Stephen Francis 
> <stephenf1113 at yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* "peace at lists.chambana.net" <peace at lists.chambana.net>; 
> "peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net" <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>; 
> "sftalk at yahoogroups.com" <sftalk at yahoogroups.com>; Wayne Coste 
> <wcoste at ae911truth.org>; occupycu <occupyCU at lists.chambana.net>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 19, 2013 9:08 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] Announcing the Midwest 9/11Truth 
> Conference, Sep 8, 2013.
>
> There have been many "leaks" related to 9/11. Sibel Edmonds, as one 
> example.
> But what she leaked about wasn't related to the attacks of 9/11. It 
> was all about
> Arabs, when Arabs played no role in the attacks. Her whistleblowing 
> ended up
> supporting the hijack conspiracy theory, which tells me that the US 
> government
> doesn't actually know what happened on 9/11.
>
> I realize that if you still think hijackings happened, then you're 
> wishing I would
> shut up. But hijackings didn't happen, and you just have to accept it 
> and move
> on if you want to catch the 9/11 perps.
>
> Hijackings is not outside the realm of commonly understood physical 
> principles.
> Those buildings going down because of a "plane crash" is beyond the realm
> of commonly understood physical principles. That doesn't mean that the 
> laws
> of physics were violated on 9/11. Rather, what it means is that there 
> are some
> laws of physics that we don't fully understand that were at play on 9/11.
>
> Just like very few people knew about atom bombs before Hiroshima,
> very few people know of this advanced weaponry and it's effects on steel
> buildings. People want to know the name of it, so I call it "cold 
> fission".
>
> If some more appropriate word surfaces in the future that more accurately
> describes the process, I'll abandon the phrase, but for now, I call it
> cold fission.
>
> The WTC complex, and all of its contents, were turned into powder at
> low temperature. Cold fission, for now, is my best explanation.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org>
>
>
> But a big problem is that there haven't been any leaks coming forward.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20130820/b1439350/attachment.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list