[Peace-discuss] AWARE - Sat's demo (& flyer, for re-view) and Sunday's meeting at White Horse
Stuart Levy
stuartnlevy at gmail.com
Sun Feb 3 22:15:28 UTC 2013
David, thanks for this. I'd worked on this one, and struggled to bring
enough facets together to suggest how the cycle of interventions (a)
sustains itself and (b) fails to live up to the humanitarian goals used
to sell them ("our military saves lives") while (c) keeping enough
supporting text to back up its own arguments better than a bunch of
bumper stickers would, to make it harder to dismiss what we're saying as
just coming from a bunch of cranks.
Maybe this is too much to ask of a 2-page flyer? Do you see pieces it
would have been better to leave out of this one, to make more room for
the rest and for eye-leading white space?
I do like the question-and-answer form, especially if we can answer
questions that people are actually tempted to raise, as with the recent
article about use of drones.
I don't mean this to sound snarky - I'd really like for our flyers to be
eye-catching enough that casual readers will want to read through them.
On 2/3/13 11:37 AM, David Johnson wrote:
> flyer2013-02-02-greenwald
> *It's good information but it is too much information for a flyer.*
> **
> *In my opinion, it would be better to have less information and larger
> font, maybe even a photo or graphic, and then an AWARE web-site
> address for more detailed info.*
> *Practice answers to questions or statements from people would be
> good as well.*
> *David Johnson*
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Carl G. Estabrook <mailto:galliher at illinois.edu>
> *To:* Stuart Levy <mailto:stuartnlevy at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Peace Discuss <mailto:peace-discuss at anti-war.net>
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 03, 2013 10:56 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Peace-discuss] AWARE - Sat's demo (& flyer,for
> re-view) and Sunday's meeting at White Horse
>
> Nice work.
>
> The flyer provides practically the only serious information about
> the war in town - certainly not the N-G or radio/TV news.
>
> As the administration works desperately to distract attention from
> its expanding war, we should redouble our efforts to publicize it.
>
> And we should work to find fora in which to answer comments like
> the ones posed here. A report on the demo & the comments on AOTA
> is a place to start.
>
> --CGE
>
> On Feb 3, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Stuart Levy <stuartnlevy at gmail.com
> <mailto:stuartnlevy at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> First: yes we do plan to meet at the White Horse bar again.
>>
>> Yesterday's demonstration - well I see Karen just wrote about it
>> too. Thanks to everybody!
>>
>> I thought the most interesting comment was from a woman who said,
>> "Everybody's against war - no one goes to war because they *want*
>> to." As if war were one of those winds that blows nobody good.
>> I offered some examples of people who might see war as a great
>> way to promote their own interests.
>>
>> Maybe hers is a common way of thinking - one we should keep
>> directly confronting as we talk about war.
>>
>> No ground hogs came by, but our new mascot mouse -- hardly the
>> size of the last joint of your thumb -- was awfully cute.
>> Scrabbling hard for seeds in the austerity of winter.
>>
>> We handed out a bunch of flyers, using fragments from Glenn
>> Greenwald's and Seumas Milne's recent Guardian articles on Mali
>> and the cycle of endless war. Sorry these weren't passed around
>> in advance, but please see attached.
>>
>>
>> -------
>>
>>
>>
>> Mali? Libya? The Phillippines? Somalia?
>> Yemen? Iraq? Afghanistan? Pakistan?
>> Haven't we been here before?
>>
>> (excerpts below from Glenn Greenwald writing in The Guardian, Jan
>> 14th 1)
>>
>> As French war planes bomb Mali, there is one simple statistic
>> that provides the key context: this west African nation of 15
>> million people is the eighth country in which western powers -
>> over the last four years alone - have bombed and killed Muslims -
>> after Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Somalia and the
>> Philippines (that does not count the numerous lethal tyrannies
>> propped up by the west in that region). For obvious reasons, the
>> rhetoric that the west is not at war with the Islamic world grows
>> increasingly hollow with each new expansion of this militarism.
>> But within this new massive bombing campaign, one finds most of
>> the vital lessons about western intervention that, typically, are
>> ignored.
>>
>> First, as this NY Times' account makes clear, much of the
>> instability in Mali is the direct result of Nato's intervention
>> in Libya. [...] As Owen Jones wrote in an excellent column in the
>> Independent:
>>
>> "This intervention is itself the consequence of another. The
>> Libyan war is frequently touted as a success story for
>> liberal interventionism. Yet the toppling of Muammar
>> Gaddafi's dictatorship had consequences that Western
>> intelligence services probably never even bothered to
>> imagine. Tuaregs -- who traditionally hailed from northern
>> Mali -- made up a large portion of his army. When Gaddafi was
>> ejected from power, they returned to their homeland:
>> sometimes forcibly so as black Africans came under attack in
>> post-Gaddafi Libya, an uncomfortable fact largely ignored by
>> the Western media. . . . [T]he Libyan war was seen as a
>> success . . . and here we are now engaging with its
>> catastrophic blowback."
>>
>> Over and over, western intervention ends up - whether by
>> ineptitude or design - sowing the seeds of further intervention.
>> Given the massive instability still plaguing Libya as well as
>> enduring anger over the Benghazi attack, how long will it be
>> before we hear that bombing and invasions in that country are -
>> once again - necessary to combat the empowered "Islamist" forces
>> there: forces empowered as a result of the Nato overthrow of that
>> country's government?
>>
>> Second, the overthrow of the Malian government was enabled by
>> US-trained-and- armed soldiers who defected. From the NYT:
>> "commanders of this nation's elite army units, the fruit of years
>> of careful American training, defected when they were needed most
>> --- taking troops, guns, trucks and their newfound skills to the
>> enemy in the heat of battle, according to senior Malian military
>> officials." Then: "an American-trained officer overthrew Mali's
>> elected government, setting the stage for more than half of the
>> country to fall into the hands of Islamic extremists." [...]
>>
>> Third, western bombing of Muslims in yet another country will
>> obviously provoke even more anti-western sentiment, the fuel of
>> terrorism. Already, as the Guardian reports, French fighter jets
>> in Mali have killed "at least 11 civilians including three
>> children". France's long history of colonialization in Mali only
>> exacerbates the inevitable anger. In December, after the UN
>> Security Council authorized the intervention in Mali, Amnesty
>> International's researcher on West Africa, Salvatore Saguès,
>> warned: "An international armed intervention is likely to
>> increase the scale of human rights violations we are already
>> seeing in this conflict." ...
>>
>> Indeed, at the same time that the French are now killing
>> civilians in Mali, a joint French-US raid in Somalia caused the
>> deaths of "at least eight civilians, including two women and two
>> children". To believe that the US and its allies can just
>> continue to go around the world, in country after country, and
>> bomb and kill innocent people - Muslims - and not be targeted
>> with "terrorist" attacks is, for obvious reasons, lunacy.
>>
>> Fourth, for all the self-flattering rhetoric that western
>> democracies love to apply to themselves, it is extraordinary how
>> these wars are waged without any pretense of democratic process.
>> [...] The Obama administration has, of course, draped its entire
>> drone and global assassination campaign in an impenetrable cloth
>> of secrecy, ensuring it remains beyond the scrutinizing reach of
>> media outlets, courts, and its own citizens. The US and its
>> western allies do not merely wage endless war aimed invariably at
>> Muslims. They do so in virtually complete secrecy, without any
>> transparency or accountability. Meet the western "democracies".
>>
>> Finally, the propaganda used to justify all of this is
>> depressingly common yet wildly effective. Any western government
>> that wants to bomb Muslims simply slaps the label of "terrorists"
>> on them, and any real debate or critical assessment instantly
>> ends before it can even begin. [...] There is no doubt that the
>> Malian rebels have engaged in all sorts of heinous atrocities
>> ("amputations, flogging, and stoning to death for those who
>> oppose their interpretation of Islam"), but so, too, have Malian
>> government forces - including, as Amnesty chronicled, "arresting,
>> torturing and killing Tuareg people apparently only on ethnic
>> ground." As Jones aptly warns: "don't fall for a narrative so
>> often pushed by the Western media: a perverse oversimplification
>> of good fighting evil, just as we have seen imposed on Syria's
>> brutal civil war." [...]
>>
>> (and, from a Jan 22nd article by Seumas Milne, also in The
>> Guardian2)
>>
>> [...] All this is anyway about a good deal more than terrorism.
>> Underlying the growing western military involvement in Africa --
>> from the spread of American bases under the US Africa Command to
>> France's resumption of its post-colonial habit of routine armed
>> intervention -- is a struggle for resources and strategic
>> control, in the face of China's expanding economic role in the
>> continent. In north and west Africa, that's not just about oil
>> and gas, but also uranium in countries like Niger -- and Mali.
>> Terrorism has long since become a catch-all cover for
>> legitimizing aggressive war.
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/14/mali-france-bombing-intervention-libya
>> [2]
>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/22/mali-fastest-blowback-war-on-terror/
>>
>>
>> It doesn't have to be this way. Let your elected representatives
>> know you oppose the pattern of endless intervention and war. In
>> this area: US Rep. Rodney Davis (R IL-13), (202) 224-3121, and US
>> Senators Richard Durbin (D-IL) (202) 224-2152, and Mark Kirk
>> (R-IL) (202) 224-2854.
>>
>> This flyer comes from AWARE, the Anti-War, Anti-Racism Effort of
>> Champaign-Urbana -- on Facebook at: http://on.fb.me/WHYaje Watch
>> our weekly Urbana Public TV (channel 6) program, "AWARE on the
>> Air", Tuesdays at 10PM -- or join us in the Urbana City Council
>> Chambers for the live unrehearsed recordings at noon Tuesdays.
>> Meetings? 5PM Sunday evenings. Write us at aware at anti-war.net for
>> more info.
>>
>>
>> <flyer2013-02-02-greenwald+milne.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> Peace-discuss mailing list
>> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
>> <mailto:Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net>
>> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peace-discuss mailing list
> Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
> https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20130203/989f58a5/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list