[Peace-discuss] Organize!

[Karen Medina]

Laurie Solomon <ls1000 at live.com> wrote:
> Karen,
> [...] for that argument to even be considered in a court, Martin would have had to be
> the winner of the battle and Zimmerman the dead loser, where Martin would
> have been the one on trail.  I think it would be hard for a victim to make a
> relevant self-defense argument or for the prosecution to make such an
> argument on behalf of the victim in prosecuting the defendant.

So only the victor can claim self-defense.
It is not a question, it is a statement.
So, who typically is the victor?