[Peace-discuss] America's first black president [takes steps] to keep blacks in prison under law now deemed unconstitutional

[C. G. Estabrook]

"It is a matter of infinite difficulty, but fortunately of comparative indifference, to determine what a man's motive may have been for this or that particular action. Rather seek to learn what his objects in general are!--What does he habitually wish? habitually pursue?--and thence deduce his impulses, which are commonly the true efficient causes of men's conduct; and without which the motive itself would not have become a motive. Let a haunch of venison represent the motive, and the keen appetite of health and exercise the impulse: then place the same or some more favourite dish, before the same man, sick, dyspeptic, and stomach-worn, and we may then weigh the comparative influences of motives and impulses. Without the perception of this truth, it is impossible to understand the character of Iago, who is represented as now assigning one, and then another, and again a third, motive for his conduct, all alike the mere fictions of his own restless nature, distempered by a keen sense of his intellectual superiority, and haunted by the love of exerting power, on those especially who are his superiors in practical and moral excellence. Yet how many among our modern critics have attributed to the profound author [Shakespeare] this, the appropriate inconsistency of the character itself!"

      --Samuel Taylor Coleridge, 1812. Coleridge is the source of the phrase "motiveless malignity," used by critics since his time to describe Iago's hatred of Othello (except of course for those contemporary critics who simply ascribe it to racism and think their job is done).  

It would perhaps be a salutary exercise to ignore what Obama's "motive may have been for this or that particular action. Rather seek to learn what his objects in general are!"
 
Perhaps that's the wisdom Ron's offering us. But it's not a pretty sight. 


On Jul 24, 2013, at 7:38 PM, E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森 <ewj at pigsqq.org> wrote:

> It is refreshing to know that I dont have to question Carl's
> motive in opposing the war and in his consistent criticism of
> Obama and his minions.  Those things become strangely
> dim to me, a sort of unreality, as I focus on the
> clear white light ahead of me.
> 
> It's all sort of a matter of Brownian motion,
> random, chaotic, Mandelbrot patterns.
> 
> Pointless to assign a point to any point.
> 
> The repeating patterns and self-similarity
> are just manifestations of pure chaos, no need
> to assign any pretext or presuppositions to it.
> 
> It is all clear to me now...
> 
> wow oxo mom
> 
> 
> On 07/25/13 3:54, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>> Brother Szoke cautions us against attributing any motive to the Obama administration's "declaring to its population that thousands of its citizens must continue to sit in prison..."
>> 
>> And if we and/or others nevertheless choose to object, it's likely little will change, because "few have even heard of the stunning position taken by President Obama"...
>> 
>> 
>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "E. Wayne Johnson 朱稳森"<ewj at pigsqq.org>  wrote:
>> 
>>   
>>> Cruel and unusual?
>>> 
>>> If it's done often enough it isn't unusual any more.
>>> 
>>> And cruel is a matter of opinion, just ask Dr. Sade.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 07/24/13 22:24, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Alec Karakatsanis, Guardian - Last month, President Obama quietly did something that should shake every American to the core. Seeking to enforce federal crack cocaine laws that have since been repealed, the Obama administration asked a federal appeals court to ensure that thousands of human beings, mostly poor and mostly black, remain locked in prison – even though everyone agrees that there is no justification for them to be there...
>>>> 
>>>> Half of all human beings in federal prison are there because of a nonviolent drug offense. The number of nonviolent drug offenders in prisons and jails around America has increased 1100% since 1980. The vast majority of those in prison are very poor. African Americans constitute only 14-15% of the nation's drug users (about the same as their percentage of the general population); yet, they constitute 37% of those arrested for drug offenses, 59% of those convicted for drug offenses, and 74% of those sentenced to prison for a drug offense...
>>>> 
>>>> Until President Obama signed the Fair Sentencing Act, on 3 August 2010, there had been, for over two decades, a 100:1 disparity in the quantities of drugs seized that would trigger the mandatory minimum penalties faced by tens of thousands of people like my client. In other words, while my client's five to 40 years was triggered by only 5g of crack cocaine, it would take 500g (half a kilo) of powder cocaine to trigger the same penalty.
>>>> 
>>>> A further disparity: 82% of federal crack cocaine defendants are African-American; only 27% of powder cocaine defendants are African-American...
>>>> 
>>>> The president, Congress, and every serious expert agreed that this disparity was unjustifiable. Indeed, the two substances are pharmacologically identical. Curiously, though, without giving any reasons, Congress did not reduce the disparity to 1:1, as even federal law enforcement officials had conceded was appropriate. Instead, it picked the nice round number of 18:1. Even in making that arbitrarily decision, however, Congress did not indicate what was to happen to all those already sitting in prison under a law that Congress and the White House had now found to be unjust....
>>>> 
>>>> For several years, federal judges have done nothing to remedy this injustice; one famously concluded that the prisoners sentenced under the old law had simply "lost on a temporal roll of the cosmic dice". So, there are American citizens serving tens of thousands of years in prison because, according to all three branches of government, it's just their tough luck?
>>>> 
>>>> Apparently so, until two months ago. On 17 May 2013, the US court of appeals for the sixth circuit held that the new, "fair" sentences must be applied to all those previously sentenced under laws that everyone acknowledges were discriminatory. The two-judge majority opinion wrote forcefully and with unusual candor about the history of unequal treatment under the old laws. The judges ordered that those sentenced under those laws were entitled to ask federal judges to reduce their sentences.
>>>> 
>>>> The Justice Department is now seeking to overturn that decision – which will be devastating news to many thousands like my original crack cocaine client. The Obama administration would surely condemn an oppressive foreign dictator's regime for the singular cruelty of declaring to its population that thousands of its citizens must continue to sit in prison for no good reason. The fact that few have even heard of the stunning position taken by President Obama is a sad reflection on how incurious mainstream US public opinion is about what underpins our mass incarceration society.
>>>> 
>>>> [Undernews]
>>>> _______________________________________________