[Peace-discuss] Draft flyer (corrected) for AWARE demo, Aug. 3
Stephen Francis via Peace-discuss
peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
Mon Aug 4 06:15:09 EDT 2014
I was joking about the conspiracy....
But also thought that a couple of you would take the bait and think I was serious......(maybe :)
I just find it very telling and consistent that 9/11 Truth has been carved out of the peace movement and vilified. This IS a conspiracy whose roots are in NYC.
Over 2200 professional architects and engineers agree that WTC twin towers and WTC7 were demolished murdering 3000 people. Arab patsies could not have done it the way our corrupt government describes according to the laws of physics. They also cannot find any like professionals to debate them and their work is peer-reviewed unlike NIST.
How can you protest against our government and trust what they say about 9/11.... It doesn't make sense unless their is a hidden agenda behind the inconsistency..... You all know what I think about that....
World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE911Truth
World Trade Center Building 7 Demolished on 9/11? | AE91...
Did you know that 3 towers fell on 9/11? World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed on 9/11 after the Twin Towers but was never hit by a plane. How?...
View on www.ae911truth.org Preview by Yahoo
On Sunday, August 3, 2014 9:58 PM, ewjohnson via Peace-discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> wrote:
Stephen,
A lot of what you have to say is useful and relevant.
CGE has perhaps more than anyone defended your right to say it.
It isn't very healthy to find a daemon behind every bush.
(Some of them have several.)
On 08/04/2014 10:31 AM, Stephen Francis via Peace-discuss wrote:
Here's a conspiracy for ya...
>Channel 3 sent out a video person to record the massive crowd of 6-8 people at Church and Neil demonstration today.
>She first set up her camera at the North East corner then moved it to the Northwest corner when she discovered what my poster said.
>She deliberately set the camera up in a new position where two other protesters obscured the view of my poster....
>see attachment....
>Is this a conspiracy or what? ....
>
>
>
>On Sunday, August 3, 2014 6:59 PM, Carl G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>You left out the Giant Rat of Sumatra, "a story for which the world is not yet prepared."
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Aug 3, 2014, at 8:45 PM, Stephen Francis <stephenf1113 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>You (CGE) have very eloquently proven my point. Chomsky's prominence as an intellectual voice for the 99% is undeniable except for 9/11 Truth. Coming from a 9/11 Truther, this is a glaring inconsistency, because the same people we all rail against did 9/11 in our view.
>
>
>There is an ever growing list of dubious 'Commissions' and cover-ups involving international crimes that have not passed the stink test including the Warren Commission, the Dreyfus Affair, The Gladio Stay Behind Network, Dimona, The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, Pedophile Priests, Pearl Harbor, The Looting of Russia after the breakup of the Soviet Union, The USS Liberty, Iran Contra, the looting of Japan after WWII, Murdochs Phone Hacking, the Lincoln assassination, Holocaust Hoax, WWI and WWII war profiteering, Stalin's last years, failed Cuban invasion, the Hollywood creation called the Italian mafia, ....on and on... 9/11 has just joined the list.
>
>
>Once it becomes common knowledge that 9/11 really was an inside job (Israel, Saudi Arabia, Britain and the U. S.) Chomsky is going to have more than egg on his face. He will be proven an accomplice to the crime.
>
>
>
>On Sunday, August 3, 2014 5:44 PM, Carl G. Estabrook <galliher at illinois.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>Chomsky was of course "a nationally recognized figure" for more than 40 years before the events of 9/11/2001.
>
>As a young man he did for the study of
language roughly what Einstein had done
for physics: he established a new model
for the subsequent science.
>
>In the 1960's he took up writing against
Kennedy's war in SE Asia and quickly
became one of the most important
anti-war voices with articles like "The
Responsibility of Intellectuals" (1967)
<http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19670223.htm> and "On the Backgrounds of the Pacific War" (1967) <http://www.chomsky.info/articles/196709--.htm> - still very much worth reading.
>
>Chomsky is an anarchist (libertarian
socialist, if you prefer). He presents a
convincing case for that position in
"Government in the Future" (1970) <http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/2006/11/noam-chomsky-lecture-from-1970-full.html>.
>
>His brief book "9-11" was a best seller
in 2001, because it didn't follow the US
government/media line. Here's a summary:
>
>"In '9-11', published in November 2001
and arguably the single most influential
post 9-11 book, internationally renowned
thinker Noam Chomsky bridged the
information gap around the World Trade
Center attacks, cutting through the
tangle of political opportunism,
expedient patriotism, and general
conformity that choked off American
discourse in the months immediately
following. Chomsky placed the attacks in
context, marshaling his deep and nuanced
knowledge of American foreign policy to
trace the history of American political
aggression - in the Middle East and
throughout Latin America as well as in
Indonesia, in Afghanistan, in India and
Pakistan - at the same time warning
against America’s increasing reliance on
military rhetoric and violence in its
response to the attacks, and making the
critical point that the mainstream media
and public intellectuals were failing to
make: any escalation of violence as a
response to violence will inevitably
lead to further, and bloodier, attacks
on innocents in America and around the
world..."
>
>Chomsky's politics are such that he is
cordially hated by soi-disant liberals
and progressives. In an interview in
2008 he said,
>
>"I should say that the place where I am
most feared and despised is probably in
left liberal intellectual circles. If
you want to see a graphic indication of
this, take a look at one of my favorite
journal covers, which is framed and
posted right outside my door. It’s the
more or less official journal of left
liberal intellectuals, The American
Prospect, and the cover depicts the
terrible circumstances in which they try
to survive – the enormous forces that
are virtually destroying them.
>
>"In the picture, two figures are
depicted; two faces, sneering and angry.
On one side is Dick Cheney and the
Pentagon, on the other side is me. The
left liberal intellectuals are caught
between these two huge forces. This
depiction is indicative of the paranoia
and concern that there might be some
small break in orthodoxy. The liberal
intellectuals (and not just in the
United States) are typically the
guardians at the gates: we’ll go this
far, but not one millimeter farther; and
it’s terrifying to think that somebody
might go a millimeter farther. This
extends throughout the major media too.
So, yes, the United States is a very
free country, in fact it’s the freest
country in the world. I don’t think
freedom of speech, for example, is
protected anywhere in the world as much
as it is here. But it’s a very managed
society, it’s a business-run society,
carefully managed, with strict doctrinal
requirements and no deviation tolerated
– this would be too dangerous.
>
>"One of the reasons it’s too dangerous
is that the political establishment,
both political parties and the political
class, is, on many major issues, well to
the right of the population. On health
care, for example, which you’ve written
about for decades, the population is to
the left of the establishment, and has
been so forever. And the same is true
for many other issues. So, permitting
issues to be discussed is threatening,
and permitting deviation from a kind of
party line is dangerous and has to be
carefully controlled."
>
>--CGE
>
>
>On Aug 3, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Stephen
Francis via Peace-discuss <peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net> wrote:
>
>> I accuse CGE of gatekeeping
because of his incessant quoting of
Chomsky.
>> I think Chomsky is in part a
nationally recognized figure because
of his views on 9/11 Truth.
>> In efforts to control the
opposition he plays a perfect role.
>> He is a prolific author and the
vast majority of his positions are
acceptable to 'liberals',
progressives'....etc (whatever they
are?)
>>
>> Zionists are very fearful of 9/11
Truth because it really threatens
them, so they have to ridicule and
keep people distracted from it.
>>
>> Chomsky keeps people talking and
not acting.
>> 9/11 Truth is about acting. It's
about prosecuting criminals not
jawboning policy. CGE is a
jawboner.....
>> NYC CAN's effort was successful
and they are in a strong position to
challenge any legal obstacles in their
path.
>> A heartfelt thank you – We did
it! – High-Rise Safety Initiative
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> A heartfelt thank you – We did
it! – High-Rise Safety In...
>> Updates about the High-Rise
Safety Initiative A heartfelt thank
you – We did it! August 1, 2014 Dear
friends,
>> View on highrisesafetynyc.org
>> Preview by Yahoo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, August 3, 2014 8:43
AM, David Johnson <davidjohnson1451 at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Stephen,
>>
>> Good article about Bolivia and
other South American countries pulling
their ambassadors from Israel,
>>
>> However, the other article is
absolute nonsense. There are no "
left-wing " U.S. Congressmen and
Senators.
>> Only corporate controlled
neo-cons and neo-liberals.
>> The ONLY elected official in the
entire U.S. that I am aware of who is
>> " Left-wing " would be Socialist
City Council member Kshama Sawant in
Seattle.
>>
>> And your continued accusations of
Carl as a " Zionist Gatekeeper " is
absurd and borders on the delusional.
>>
>> David Johnson
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
_______________________________________________
Peace-discuss mailing list
Peace-discuss at lists.chambana.net
https://lists.chambana.net/mailman/listinfo/peace-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20140804/783c285b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Peace-discuss
mailing list