[Peace-discuss] Vermont Activists Battle Democratic Governor for Single-Payer Health Care

David Johnson davidjohnson1451 at comcast.net
Mon Apr 27 18:44:35 EDT 2015


Vermont Activists Battle Democratic Governor for Single-Payer Health Care 

April 27, 2015

 <http://greenshadowcabinet.us/member-profile/7526> Steve Early, Workers
Power Administration

Liz Nikazmerad is a rarity in American labor: a local union president under
the age of 30, displaying both youth and militancy. For the last two year
years, she has led the 180-member Local 203 of the United Electrical Workers
(UE), while working in the produce department of City Market in Burlington,
Vermont. Thanks to their contract bargaining, full-time and part-time
employees of this bustling community-owned food cooperative currently enjoy
good medical benefits.

But that wasn't always the case in Nikazmerad's past non-union jobs, nor is
it any assurance that UE members won't be forced to pay more for their
health care in the future. To curb medical cost inflation and related
cost-shifting to workers, the UE has long advocated that private insurance
plans be replaced with publicly funded universal coverage.

Four years ago, a newly elected Vermont governor, Peter Shumlin, took a
promising first step in that direction at the state level. His
Democrat-dominated legislature passed Act 48, which laid the groundwork for
<http://www.thenation.com/article/159158/vermonts-struggle-single-payer-heal
thcare> creating a comprehensive public insurance plan called Green Mountain
Care (GMC).

Not all activists deemed GMC to be truly "single-payer," because of
potential legal or political obstacles to the inclusion of Vermonters
currently covered through Medicare, the Veterans' Administration, and even
some "self-insured" plans offered by local employers. However, Act 48's
blueprint for getting everyone else into a more rational, cost-effective
healthcare system, financed by taxes, was generally hailed as a great
breakthrough.

Unfortunately, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) first required Vermont to
operate a private insurance exchange until 2017, when a federal waiver
permitting further experimentation might be granted. Despite this delay,
Shumlin was still reassuring Vermonters, as recently as last fall, that a
brighter health care future lay just a few years ahead.

By January 8, when the governor began his third term, that promise had
dimmed so much that Liz Nikazmerad and several hundred others weren't there
to applaud his inauguration in Montpelier. Instead, frustrated advocates of
health care reform staged a sit-in at the state capitol, chanting and
singing, unfurling banners and refused to leave in protest against the
governor's abrupt abandonment of universal health care six weeks after his
re-election.

"People had fought for this a long time," Nikazmerad says. "It was a huge
win and to have the rug yanked out like that was very upsetting. People were
very emotional about it."

Escalating labor protests

By the end of day, the UE leader and 28 others-now known as "The Statehouse
29"-faced multiple criminal charges, including resisting arrest, despite the
peaceful nature of their capitol sit-in. The cases against 18 were later
dropped; other participants settled by paying a fine or promising to do
community service work. Their still controversial reproach to the governor
has, since January, become the first in a series of angry labor sorties to
Montpelier.

During the current legislative session, the bitter recriminations over the
governor's health care retreat have morphed into broader controversies about
workers rights, contract concessions, and what the Vermont Progressive Party
(VPP) calls Shumlin's "austerity budget." On April 11, 500 state employees,
school teachers and other union members rallied at the state house to
protest threatened budget cuts and state worker lay-offs. Among the
demonstration sponsors were the VPP, the Vermont State Employees Association
(VSEA), and the Vermont Workers Center, which is also building for another
big labor gathering on May Day in Montpelier.

"I'm tired of being asked to give back more and more of my wages and
benefits, " state highway department plow driver Ed Olsen told the crowd.
"The state always wants to balance the budget on the backs of hard-working
Vermonters."

Alison Sylvester, a leader of the Vermont NEA, added her union's voice to
the "Fight Back" rally and hailed public teachers successful defense of
their right to strike. After a brief public school work stoppage in South
Burlington last fall, Governor Shumlin publicly endorsed the idea of banning
such strikes, which have been legal in Vermont for fifty years. It took
several months of frantic lobbying by hundreds of teachers to kill this
idea, by a two-to-one margin, in a Vermont House vote in early April.

About-face on single payer

Shumlin's most publicized betrayal of past labor allies occurred, with
little advance notice, on December 17. That's when he called a press
conference and declared that "now is not the time to ask our legislature to
take the step of passing a financing plan for Green Mountain Care." The
58-year old governor, a multi-millionaire former business owner, had already
postponed the day of reckoning on how to fund universal coverage for more
than two years, until he was narrowly elected for the third time. (In last
year's gubernatorial race, Shumlin greatly outspent his Republican
challenger, but won by only 2,500 votes; his 46 percent showing would not
have been sufficient without conservative vote-splitting by a Libertarian
candidate.)

The 2015 session of the legislature was expected to take up the challenge of
Act 48 financing in January. With the acquiescence of key legislators,
Shumlin short-circuited that debate by issuing a highly unfavorable status
report of his own, which seemed to validate past single-payer criticism by
the Vermont GOP and conservative Democrats. According to Shumlin, the latest
projected cost of universal coverage would double the state budget in its
first year alone, while requiring onerous new payroll and income taxes.

"In my judgment," the governor stated, "the potential economic disruption
and risks would be too great to small businesses, working families, and the
state's economy."

The VWC, which helped mobilize statewide support for passage of Act 48 four
years ago, countered the governor's claims by releasing its own plan for
financing Green Mountain Care in a manner more equitable than the state's
current market-based system.

One hundred economists endorsed the VWC approach, which relies on
progressive taxation. The VWC also struck back with a clever "whiteboard"
<http://www.workerscenter.org/video> video, entitled "The Time is Now:
Healthcare Financing for Vermont, Explained in Three Minutes." But, of
course, neither that quick tutorial on health care reform math or the VWC's
full report garnered the media attention-or had the same legislative
clout-as Shumlin's self-demolition of Green Mountain Care.

>From bad to worse in Montpelier

In his state budget address in January, Shumlin had another surprise for his
past labor friends. He presented the 5,500-member VSEA with a choice between
re-opening its current contract and agreeing to give-backs or face hundreds
of layoffs. These steps were necessary, he announced, to close a fiscal year
2016 budget deficit, projected to be $112 million, which soon become the
main preoccupation of his administration and its legislative allies.

Legislators representing the Vermont Progressive Party (VPP),
<http://inthesetimes.com/article/13092/out_of_the_margins_into_the_fray> the
nation's most successful third party formation, urged their Democratic
colleagues to raise needed revenue by capping tax deductions for the
wealthiest Vermonters and taxing capital gains on the same basis as earned
income.

Neither the Democratic leadership nor the governor wanted to do that. So his
administration is instead seeking $8.8 million in state worker concessions,
and the Democrat-controlled House has already approved cuts in social
programs like heating assistance for low-income households.

In 2008-9, VSEA members agreed to a 3% pay cut, followed by a freeze, under
Shumlin's Republican predecessor. When Shumlin ran for governor in 2010, he
promised to be more labor-friendly and find better ways to pay for state
programs, including the projected single-payer-like plan. Now he is
scapegoating unions that backed him and health care reform, complaining that
state workers' scheduled pay hike this year is unreasonably high. "There
aren't too many Vermonters who are getting a 5% increase this year," he told
the press on April 11.

Shumlin's about-face on Green Mountain Care reflected more than revised
estimates of its cost and feasibility. The troubled 2013 rollout of Vermont
Health Connect, the state's ACA-mandated private insurance exchange,
adversely affected public perceptions of the longer-term goal of single
payer. Among those most upset were lower-income people previously covered by
state-subsidized plans who ended up paying more out-of-pocket when insured
through the new exchange.

"Over the last few years, the Shumlin administration hasn't done anything to
give Vermonters confidence that we could handle being innovators in health
care," says Chris Pearson, a Progressive state rep and vice-chair of the
House Committee on Health Care. "There were just too many bad headlines
about the nightmare of enrolling, computer problems and cost over-runs."

As a result, the popularity of Green Mountain Care is not what it was even a
year ago. Pollsters working for the Vermont NEA
<http://vtdigger.org/2014/02/21/single-payer-advocacy-group-gets-boost-nea-p
oll-shows-support-health-reform/%29> found 55 percent of those surveyed in
favor of the concept then, while 42 percent were opposed. A slight majority
remained in favor even if implementation required, as it would, a large tax
increase to capture health care system revenue currently coming, in myriad
forms, from individuals and employers, in both the private and public
sector.

After the recent flurry of negative publicity about Green Mountain Care-much
of it generated by Shumlin's own disputed cost estimates- 64-percent of
Vermonters polled in February said they supported the governor's new
position, only 20 percent were opposed, and 10 percent were unsure. Even a
majority of Democrats polled said they favored his abandonment of single
payer, for the time being.

Inside the state legislature, friends of Act 48 still hope to emerge from
this legislative session with an authorized study of the VWC's financing
plan, the governor's contested findings and a publicly funded primary care
plan that has been proposed by some single payer advocates as an incremental
step toward Green Mountain Care.

Organizing Challenges Ahead

Sometime in May, the legislative wrangling in Montpelier over budget cuts,
health care, and workers rights will be over for this year. But the
challenges facing Vermont Progressives and labor-community organizers will
remain daunting. Chief among them is sustaining a now seven-year-old
campaign to make "healthcare a human right" after such a demoralizing
setback. While continuing to assist private and public sector workers
involved in strikes and contract fights, the Vermont Workers Center plans to
do more grassroots organizing around the shortcomings of Vermont Health
Connect coverage.

Within the VPP, its statewide organizer Kelly Mangan has "gotten a lot of
member feedback about running a candidate for governor next year." This is
something her third party refrained from doing in the last three election
cycles, to avoid putting a Republican in office-who would have opposed Act
48 from the outset or shelved it sooner than Shumlin did.

Now, the growing estrangement of labor voters from the Democrats could lead
to Shumlin's replacement by a Republican. One likely candidate for the job
is Lieutenant Governor Phil Scott, the affable GOP incumbent who defeated
Vermont Progressive Party (VPP) candidate Dean Corren last November by a 62
to 34% margin, with no Democrat on the ballot.

Any backlash against Vermont Democrats next year, though, might be salved by
further VPP legislative gains. Last fall, seven Progressive state reps and
three senators were elected, creating the VPP's largest delegation in
Montpelier ever. In March, Progressives captured four seats on the
Burlington City Council, where the VPP has jousted with a centrist Democrat
mayor.

But, next year, personal health problems may prevent state senator Anthony
Pollina, the VPP's most experienced statewide standard-bearer, from running
for governor. (In 2008, he placed second in a three-way race). At the
moment, Vermont's most successful progressive politician, U.S. Senator
Bernie Sanders, seems more intent on seeking executive office higher than
any available in Montpelier, where, as governor, he could help get Vermont
back on the single-payer road.

In his not-yet-official campaigning for the White House, Sanders speaks
regularly to out-of-state audiences about the need for a "
<http://inthesetimes.com/working/entry/17814/bernie_sanders_endorses_chuy_ga
rcia_in_chicago_mayoral_election> political revolution." Unfortunately, on
his own home turf, the wrong kind of revolution may be brewing, fed by
working class alienation from pro-corporate Democrats.

~  <http://greenshadowcabinet.us/member-profile/7526> Steve Early serves in
the Workers Power Administration at the Green Shadow Cabinet

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.chambana.net/pipermail/peace-discuss/attachments/20150427/e2cb1ff8/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Peace-discuss mailing list