[IMC-US] banners, and width, and some visioning questions

[daniel scott]

sup yall,

remember that if you expand the site you are looking at putting a new 
stretch of uniform color somewhere in the banner.  I agree the best 
place to do this would be where the ((i)) meets the image. But even 
here i think it throws off the balance of the banner, and makes it look 
a little broken.

ex. of two places to expand the banner
http://rumpus.rackhost.net/bannera.png
http://rumpus.rackhost.net/bannerb.png

i think we should center the site and leave the expandable option alone.

dan
nyc imc

------------------------------

On Dec 18, 2004, at 5:49 PM, deva wrote:

> I can be a variable width site if the indy (((i))) is separated from 
> the rest of the banner and the rest justifies right
>
> adding to the discussion, one thing that stands out to me is that the 
> majority of content is from a handful of local imc's - proportionally, 
> there is too much portland stuff, (or conversely, not enough other 
> stuff)
>
> one priority would be to get other local imc's syndicated
>
> cheers
> deva
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2004, at 9:31 AM, Ana wrote:
>
>> also, i know there are folks who have argued that we should keep the 
>> site
>> this width becuase it is friendlier to folks with small screens. they 
>> dont
>> have to scroll across to read the site. one solution was to just 
>> center the
>> site so that there is a white border on both sides, not just the 
>> right side.
>> would that improve it for you enough, bht?
>>
>> i think it would be great if we could have an irc meeting soon. i 
>> will be at
>> a family reunion from wedensday to wednesday but could do it before 
>> that or
>> in 2005. thoughts?
>>
>> peace
>> ana
>> nycimc
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-US mailing list
> IMC-US at lists.ucimc.org
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us