[IMC-US] Re: process for features

[bradley at riseup.net]

Hey,

> Posted? I didn't even see it proposed!

While it wasn't titled, "Proposal" it was titled, "Submission"

> Aren't we going a bit too fast
> here?

Max did sauggest to use our best judgement during this elections rush. I
read the article and thought it was informative, timely, and well written.

I know this is a big assumption..... ( ;

But, I did not see anything that i thought could have been controversial
to an IMCista in that article.

> How much coffee are you guys taking in??  :O

Actually, I prefer drinking hot chai mixed with soy milk ( ;

> Seriously though, we
> need to get some better process together here. Agreed that the time is
> critical, but everyone needs to see the features before they go up.

Ok, better process is fine ( ;

But, "everyone needs to see the features before they go up"

no comment.

> I
> didn't
> see this one other than when medea sent it as a personal submission to the
> US IMC address. Anyone could send anything that way, yes?

I did suggest that a new list be set up, perhaps imc-us-editorial at ucimc.org
where emails sent to imc-us at indymedia.org be directed.

Sascha said that he could set up the list, but that we may want to wait
until after to the elections the initial launch of the site to see if
another list was needed was or not. That seemed reasonable to me.

People are, without a doubt, going to send articles to that email address.

onward,
Bradley