[IMC-US] Re: fallujah

Ana Nogueira ana at riseup.net
Fri Nov 5 14:34:00 CST 2004


I also want to be careful about our relationship with global. But global has
a very particular and I would even say peculiar definition of what news
should become a feature.

 one of the main reasons I personally wanted a usimc site is because I have
been disappointed by the LACK of coverage on global about iraq, and
generally all the us stories with real global ramifications.

I think the us imc is poised to be a lot more hard-hitting and fast-paced.
And definately global in news scope too. Us bombing fallujah is definitely a
us news story, and I don¹t know why the global site would pick this current
bombing phase to feature when they have ignored so many in the past.

I think we can accomplish covering all of this if we a) pull more imcs into
the syndication, and b) promote as many global stories from us sites as we
do local stories. And write our own feature compilations too that cross both
lines. 

Peace
ana

On 11/5/04 2:33 PM, "deva" <drdartist at riseup.net> wrote:

> I would say that us-imc should cover us news
> 
> Now since the us has its nose and its fist spread all across the world,
> all news is in a way us news, but I think us-imc should be very careful
> about harming global imc
> 
> I am torn, because Fallujah is important news to get out to United
> Statesians, but if us-imc starts featuring the important news to get
> out to people, it becomes another kind of global features site. I
> prefer the idea of syndicating the global features in some manner
> 
> deva
> 
> 
> On Nov 5, 2004, at 9:03 AM, max wrote:
> 
>> well I think this will be an ongoing discussion..what to feature on
>> us.indy,
>> what to leave for other IMCs.
>> 
>> we should definitely get something up on what's going on in fallujah
>> 
>> http://www.freep.com/news/nw/iraq5e_20041105.htm
>> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/
>> 2002082787_fallujah05.html
>> http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/14525909
>> http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=11799
>> 
>> etc. but I couldn't find any independent coverage/analysis at all.
>> anyone
>> know of anything already written up?
>> 
>> max
>> 
>> 
>> Quoting bht <bht at indymedia.org>:
>> 
>>> i am also against having this a feature of us imc.  i think its place
>>> on
>>> us imc would be in the syndicated feature wire should indybay feature
>>> it
>>> on their local page.
>>> 
>>> this is a global story.  it belongs on the global page, i almost think
>>> it
>>> would be good to highlight somewhere on the site other indy sites like
>>> us
>>> imc.  there is global, of course, and there is also oceania
>>> syndication
>>> site.
>>> 
>>> also, i am very concerned about the crossposting on indy sites, and i
>>> especially worry about the relationship that us.indy will have with
>>> indymedia.org
>>> 
>>> i dont know how many of you are familiar with the global process and
>>> such,
>>> but global imc working group is a very small group of people that take
>>> original submissions or compile features themselves and post them as
>>> features.
>>> 
>>> i think the actual number of people that actively participate in
>>> global
>>> features right now is 4 or 6.  And quite a few of the people on this
>>> list
>>> and actively doing work on this site are people that used to be
>>> involved
>>> with global features.  So the energy and momentum is switching, as it
>>> should.
>>> 
>>> I kind of lost my track of thought, so I am going to stop rambling.
>>> But,
>>> I think my main point was that we should create a symbiotic
>>> relationship
>>> with other indy sites, especially global.
>>> bht
>>> 
>>> ahhh! Chris Anderson
>>>>> And we don't have to mention the US connection in
>>>>> every story either.  If we did it would
>>>>> sound like the RCP having to mention Bob Avakian in
>>>>> every story, speech, etc.  The
>>>>> cumulative coverage of the site will make the US
>>>>> connection clear.
>>>> 
>>>> I disagree with the above statement in general, but am
>>>> not opposed to this feature specifically. That said, I
>>>> dont see why we shouldn't mention the impact Arafat's
>>>> death will have on the US.  There's a way to do it so
>>>> we dont "sound like bob avakian."
>>>> 
>>>> chris
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> __________________________________
>>>> Do you Yahoo!?
>>>> Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
>>>> www.yahoo.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> IMC-US mailing list
>>>> IMC-US at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>>>> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> bht at indymedia.org
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IMC-US mailing list
>>> IMC-US at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>>> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IMC-US mailing list
>> IMC-US at lists.cu.groogroo.com
>> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IMC-US mailing list
> IMC-US at lists.cu.groogroo.com
> http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc-us



More information about the IMC-US mailing list