[Imc] IMC and WILL folo-up

[Peter Miller]

Sounds good.  How about gathering just those who are interested, then meeting with Jay, then bringing the results to the news collective?

-Peter

At 1/16/01 04:04 PM -0600, Paul Riismandel wrote:
>I think this is a great opportunity, too.  However, I would like to make sure that either (or both) the news collective/group and/or the whole IMC group agree to things like terms and timelines before anything is agreed to.
>
>I don't know that this is necessary before having a meeting with Jay--it all depends on what outcome is expected from that meeting.
>
>Is this a reasonable request?
>
>--Paul
>
>At 03:45 PM 1/16/01 -0600, Peter Miller wrote:
>>Yes, I'm interested.  WILL broadcasts reach from Effingham to Chicago.  We can't miss an opportunity like this!
>>
>>-Peter
>>
>>At 1/16/01 03:42 PM -0600, you wrote:
>>>Is anyone from the IMC still interested in representing the IMC in a meeting
>>>with WILL AM Program Director, Jay Pearce? I am trying to convene a meeting
>>>between the two of you to discuss possible coverage by IMC people of third
>>>party candidates for a possible regular program on WILL.   This is all very
>>>tentative.  There was some interest by some members of the IMC when I
>>>presented the subject a couple of months ago.  See correspondence below for
>>>an update.
>>>
>>>Kimberlie
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>From:   Pearce, Jay
>>>Sent:   Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:55 PM
>>>To:     Kranich, Kimberlie
>>>Subject:        RE: IMC and WILL election coverage
>>>
>>>You bet.
>>>
>>>J
>>>
>>>        -----Original Message-----
>>>        From:   Kranich, Kimberlie
>>>        Sent:   Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:50 PM
>>>        To:     Pearce, Jay
>>>        Subject:        IMC and WILL election coverage
>>>
>>>        Jay,
>>>
>>>        Are you still interested in meeting with local members of the C-U
>>>Independent Media Center with regard to future election coverage?  Recently,
>>>we briefly discussed your idea for a program called "All Parties Considered"
>>>or "Third Parties Considered" and the extra support WILL would need to
>>>program such an idea.
>>>
>>>        Kimberlie
>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Imc mailing list
>>>Imc at lists.groogroo.com
>>>http://lists.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Imc mailing list
>>Imc at lists.groogroo.com
>>http://lists.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Imc mailing list
>Imc at lists.groogroo.com
>http://lists.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/imc